The power of five - was Fed destined to lose? [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

The power of five - was Fed destined to lose?

rofe
11-22-2005, 03:17 AM
Ok, I was a little bored...

Standard disclaimer (this is MTF after all) - THIS IS A JOKE!.... :secret: or not

All are divisible by 5:

1) Played on the 20th of the month
2) It was Fed's 85th match of the year
3) He would have crossed Muster's 35th win
4) This would have been his 25th straight win in finals.
5) This was the last match of the year 2005
6) It was Fed's 15th ATP tournament of the year (excluding Kooyong and Davis Cup)

savesthedizzle
11-22-2005, 03:28 AM
You have way too much time on your hands. :lol:

Rafa = Fed Killa
11-22-2005, 03:30 AM
Mathematical Voodo. :D

Chloe le Bopper
11-22-2005, 03:31 AM
You know, if you're interested, I have a Stats assignment sitting here with your name all over it. Influential points? You know you want to.

Merton
11-22-2005, 03:44 AM
You know, if you're interested, I have a Stats assignment sitting here with your name all over it. Influential points? You know you want to.

This could be a Stats assignment only under the title "Data Snooping". Influential points do not cut it.

Chloe le Bopper
11-22-2005, 03:52 AM
This could be a Stats assignment only under the title "Data Snooping". Influential points do not cut it.
Tell that to my upper year Stats prof. I'd be more than happy for this crap to not have to count.

Merton
11-22-2005, 03:56 AM
Tell that to my upper year Stats prof. I'd be more than happy for this crap to not have to count.

Does it count for a grade? Poor you :confused: I hated stats assignments, i found them so boring.

Chloe le Bopper
11-22-2005, 04:01 AM
Does it count for a grade? Poor you :confused: I hated stats assignments, i found them so boring.
Yeah, it counts :( I have to scan various plots and some charts of blah that we calculated in order to determine if a point is influential. You clearly know what I'm talking about, or you would not feel my pain.

Merton
11-22-2005, 04:10 AM
Yeah, it counts :( I have to scan various plots and some charts of blah that we calculated in order to determine if a point is influential. You clearly know what I'm talking about, or you would not feel my pain.

:hug: I totally feel your pain, i have been there before. Good luck :wavey:

DrJules
11-22-2005, 08:58 AM
Could you use your deep insight to predict the winner of the Australian Open. You know a supernatural force has already decided. :haha: :haha: :haha:

ginny_legend
11-22-2005, 09:01 AM
yes, because he didn t open his big gob with shit, arrogant MUTHAFCKA!

mandoura
11-22-2005, 11:19 AM
:lol: Rofe. I love what you did. I do it all the time. Try to find relations between numbers. It's great.

Pea
11-22-2005, 12:24 PM
yes, because he didn t open his big gob with shit, arrogant MUTHAFCKA!

I <3 you. Bend over right now.

jazz_girl
11-22-2005, 12:36 PM
Ok, I was a little bored...

Standard disclaimer (this is MTF after all) - THIS IS A JOKE!.... :secret: or not

All are divisible by 5:

1) Played on the 20th of the month
2) It was Fed's 85th match of the year
3) He would have crossed Muster's 35th win
4) This would have been his 25th straight win in finals.
5) This was the last match of the year 2005
6) It was Fed's 15th ATP tournament of the year (excluding Kooyong and Davis Cup)
Well, a newspaper stated that David won because of the N°8 :lol: So you shouldn't be ashamed of it ;)
Apparently they say that in China, the N°8 is the lucky one: David was seeded 8, he travelled to Shanghai on the 8th, and blah, blah, blah

Deea
11-22-2005, 12:36 PM
I'm willing to bet that it was somebody's birthday in David's family on that day, and that's why Roger lost.

Good one! ;)

Doris Loeffel
11-22-2005, 12:41 PM
Your wrong - Roger is addopped to prime nubers that's why he lost ;)

Here's the lsit of his titles won by year so far: 1 - 3 - 7 - 11 - 11

Jim Jones
11-22-2005, 12:48 PM
If Federer had played the dead rubber in Davis Cup then he would have beaten the record. But he still equaled Muster's record.