pierce_mary
07-02-2005, 12:58 PM
Hello FedFans!
I've a crucial question about your favourite tennis player and I think it's really a hard matter to decide.
Think thoroughly about it and then tell me if or if not and argue why or why not Roger will ever succeed in winning Roland Garros.
Is he versatile enough to dominate his opponents on clay, too?
Or are his qualities restricted to grass and hard courts just like Sampras' were?
Will he end up like "Pistol Pete" winning Wimbledon more than half a dozen of times but never being successful in Paris?
And is he able to beat Nadal on clay?
Best wishes
pierce_mary
I've a crucial question about your favourite tennis player and I think it's really a hard matter to decide.
Think thoroughly about it and then tell me if or if not and argue why or why not Roger will ever succeed in winning Roland Garros.
Is he versatile enough to dominate his opponents on clay, too?
Or are his qualities restricted to grass and hard courts just like Sampras' were?
Will he end up like "Pistol Pete" winning Wimbledon more than half a dozen of times but never being successful in Paris?
And is he able to beat Nadal on clay?
Best wishes
pierce_mary