Miami Draw [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Miami Draw

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 07:33 PM
Possible 4th round Andy Roddick vs Ivan Ljubicic. :worship:

naiwen
03-21-2005, 07:41 PM
Karlovic vs Rochus will be interesting.

adeegee
03-21-2005, 07:44 PM
I'm truly devastated by the draw Nadal has been given.

And rubberducky, i really don't think ljubicic vs roddick is a certainty they've both got to get past some pretty good players first....maybe we can get our nadal v ljubicic match :p

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 07:46 PM
maybe we can get our nadal v ljubicic match :p

I hope that happens..its easy way for QF for Ljubo.

adeegee
03-21-2005, 07:47 PM
I hope that happens..its easy way for QF for Ljubo.

:haha: :haha: :haha:

i'll quote you on that if we're lucky enough to get the matchup

CassL
03-21-2005, 07:47 PM
Oh my, Ljubicic v. Roddick. That's my most anticipate matchup in this draw.

adeegee
03-21-2005, 07:48 PM
Oh my, Ljubicic v. Roddick. That's my most anticipate matchup in this draw.

Nadal v Roddick is a better match

CassL
03-21-2005, 07:52 PM
Nadal v Roddick is a better match

US OPEN second round? But maybe Nadal has drastically improved, at least I hope so because I like him to beat Roddick.

Sjengster
03-21-2005, 07:53 PM
On a hardcourt, no it isn't. It's a contrast of styles, but to beat Roddick on a fast surface you need some big weapons, and Ljubicic has them. There will also be plenty of rallies in a Roddick-Ljubicic match, since neither man has the net as their first love. I have a feeling Roddick will exact a tight revenge, though.

joeb_uk
03-21-2005, 07:54 PM
Nadal v Roddick is a better match
I doubt he will be able to compete with roddick on a hardcourt, even now. I think he will get smoked quite easily.

adeegee
03-21-2005, 07:56 PM
US OPEN second round? But maybe Nadal has drastically improved, at least I hope so because I like him to beat Roddick.
Nadal has improved....Obviously the Davis Cup was slightly different being on clay. But Miami is not particularly quick and certainly a lot slower than the US. Andy has the edge but I wouldn't count young Rafa out :p

World Beater
03-21-2005, 08:02 PM
I think andy has more than just an edge...esp now. dont forget that nadal hasnt played in a while now, whereas andy is fresh off playing pretty well in indian wells.

Dont forget that Andy is still one of the best on hardcourts, whereas nadal is yet to prove himself on this surface. Nadal has a chance, and I will be more than thrilled to see him win, but let's be realistic

World Beater
03-21-2005, 08:04 PM
Nadal v Roddick is a better match

what do u mean by better match? More competetive or better tennis? I will agree with the latter but not the former

onewoman74
03-21-2005, 08:04 PM
Nadal V Roddick....yes!!!

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 08:07 PM
Possible 4th round Andy Roddick vs Ivan Ljubicic. :worship:

Roddick has first to win Verdasco and Nadal, I wouldnt be surprised if he loses to any of them.

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 08:25 PM
Roddick has first to win Verdasco and Nadal, I wouldnt be surprised if he loses to any of them.

I hope he does..makes it easier for Ljubo.

Neely
03-21-2005, 08:28 PM
Deja vu for Kiefer like last year, same venue: a fellow German early and maybe again a QF with Coria :banghead:

Not good!

mangoes
03-21-2005, 08:30 PM
I'm so happy with this draw. I'm going to this event from the Quarters so this ought to be good. We may see a Federer/Ljubicic final.

World Beater
03-21-2005, 08:40 PM
luby has been impressive...but arent we getting a little ahead of ourselves.

World Beater
03-21-2005, 09:56 PM
No WC for baghdatis, whats going on here?????? Someone explain, please!

ugotlobbed
03-21-2005, 10:21 PM
NADAL VS RODDICK ...."thunder"

World Beater
03-21-2005, 10:25 PM
doesnt verdasco have to get past roddick first...i dont think that will happen

adeegee
03-21-2005, 10:28 PM
what do u mean by better match? More competetive or better tennis? I will agree with the latter but not the former

Roddick/Ljubicic will just be banging aces past each other. Roddick/Nadal is a much better match up, it'd be a far more entertaining match to watch.

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 10:32 PM
Roddick/Ljubicic will just be banging aces past each other. Roddick/Nadal is a much better match up, it'd be a far more entertaining match to watch.

Are you kidding me...whats so better to watch about Nadal getting spanked....

roddick/Ljubicic match at DC would be much better then Nadal/Roddick at Miami. almost same surface..so dont bring up Nadal/Roddick on clay/

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 10:36 PM
Are you kidding me...whats so better to watch about Nadal getting spanked....

roddick/Ljubicic match at DC would be much better then Nadal/Roddick at Miami. almost same surface..so dont bring up Nadal/Roddick on clay/

Croatian fella, concerning Nadal, u are falling in the same error of people who underrated Ljubicic in the past. :rolleyes:

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 10:38 PM
Croatian fella, concerning Nadal, u are falling in the same error of people who underrated Ljubicic in the past. :rolleyes:

Nadal on clay..yes..but he needs a year or 2..to start wining and going deep in these.....he needs to get on the juice ;)

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 10:38 PM
Nadal played very well past year there, surface is slow enough for him, I dont have any reason to expect sth different so youd better not talk too loud about him being spanked

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 10:38 PM
Well i hope he beats Roddick :)

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 10:39 PM
Nadal on clay..yes..but he needs a year or 2..to start wining and going deep in these.....he needs to get on the juice ;)

Ask Roger if the kid cant play in that court ;)

adeegee
03-21-2005, 10:39 PM
Are you kidding me...whats so better to watch about Nadal getting spanked....

roddick/Ljubicic match at DC would be much better then Nadal/Roddick at Miami. almost same surface..so dont bring up Nadal/Roddick on clay/

lets be honest, roddick is favourite to beat either nadal or ljubicic. ivan won the last match but still trails heavily in the head to head.

i'm not saying nadal would beat roddick, i certainly don't think it'd be as one sided as you suggest though. my only comment is that roddick/nadal is a much better match to watch than roddick/ljubicic in terms of entertainment value. the only thing about a roddick/ljubicic match that would be interesting is the whether there is some needle in the match seeing as they clearly don't like each other

Domino
03-21-2005, 10:40 PM
No WC for baghdatis, whats going on here?????? Someone explain, please!

I would assume that he's still injured.

adeegee
03-21-2005, 10:40 PM
Nadal on clay..yes..but he needs a year or 2..to start wining and going deep in these.....he needs to get on the juice ;)

what like ljubicic has? he's got a shocking grand slam and masters series record

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 10:42 PM
what like ljubicic has? he's got a shocking grand slam and masters series record

the past dont mean anything......Just face it. Nadal wont even take set of Roddick...

NYCtennisfan
03-21-2005, 10:43 PM
Nadal would be lucky to get to a TB against Roddick. I hope I am wrong but I just don't see it.

Domino
03-21-2005, 10:43 PM
lets be honest, roddick is favourite to beat either nadal or ljubicic. ivan won the last match but still trails heavily in the head to head.

i'm not saying nadal would beat roddick, i certainly don't think it'd be as one sided as you suggest though. my only comment is that roddick/nadal is a much better match to watch than roddick/ljubicic in terms of entertainment value. the only thing about a roddick/ljubicic match that would be interesting is the whether there is some needle in the match seeing as they clearly don't like each other

There is no way a match with Nadal would be better. Ljubicic is a better player anyways, with the right weapons to hurt Roddick, while on this surface, Nadal doesn't. Their head to head is also much closer in scoreline, despite the results.

adeegee
03-21-2005, 10:45 PM
I think I should remind you that......

Rafael 'i've got no weapons to hurt anyone on a hard court' Nadal defeated Roger 'unbeatable' Federer 6-3 6-3 in this tournament last year

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 10:45 PM
Its funny how many people think of Nadal and his "lack of weapons". Just hilarious...

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 10:49 PM
Take it easy boys..im just messing around..

Domino
03-21-2005, 10:49 PM
I think I should remind you that......

Rafael 'i've got no weapons to hurt anyone on a hard court' Nadal defeated Roger 'unbeatable' Federer 6-3 6-3 in this tournament last year

A Federer with the Flu, yeah very unbeatable I must say.

You have to remembet, Nadal's extreme topspin feeds right into Roddick's game, because Nadal needs to stand way back to use his entire swing. He can't flatten his shots out like he needs to on hardcourt.

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 10:50 PM
I think I should remind you that......

Rafael 'i've got no weapons to hurt anyone on a hard court' Nadal defeated Roger 'unbeatable' Federer 6-3 6-3 in this tournament last year


Berdych Beat Roger.Ivan spanked Berdych twice. Does that make ljubo better then Roger.Ivan also beat Nadal.who beat Roger. Does that make Ljubo better then Roger.
NO!! h2h vs other players DONT MEAN SHIT. :worship:

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 10:52 PM
A Federer with the Flu, yeah very unbeatable I must say.

You have to remembet, Nadal's extreme topspin feeds right into Roddick's game, because Nadal needs to stand way back to use his entire swing. He can't flatten his shots out like he needs to on hardcourt.

Another guy who has weak memory. You can read Roger words after the match if u want, he felt bad against Davy BUT NOT against Nadal. He said Nadal was just too good for him that day. SIMPLE. I also watched the match so you can keep that bullshit about an injured Roger for yourselves

Domino
03-21-2005, 10:54 PM
Berdych Beat Roger.Ivan spanked Berdych twice. Does that make ljubo better then Roger.Ivan also beat Nadal.who beat Roger. Does that make Ljubo better then Roger.
NO!! h2h vs other players DONT MEAN SHIT. :worship:

Well said. Anyways, another young Spaniard, the young Almagro is better suited for this tournament, though he'll need to qualify first. He's got a good, adaptable game for the hard stuff.

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 10:55 PM
Well said. Anyways, another young Spaniard, the young Almagro is better suited for this tournament, though he'll need to qualify first. He's got a good, adaptable game for the hard stuff.

you are forgetting the best Spaniard for hard courts...

adeegee
03-21-2005, 10:55 PM
A Federer with the Flu, yeah very unbeatable I must say.

You have to remembet, Nadal's extreme topspin feeds right into Roddick's game, because Nadal needs to stand way back to use his entire swing. He can't flatten his shots out like he needs to on hardcourt.

Federer was absolutely fine. Nadal also came extremely close to beating the world no.2 on a hard court in his home grand slam not so long ago. But yeah you're right, he has absolutely no weapons on a hard court

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 10:56 PM
Well said. Anyways, another young Spaniard, the young Almagro is better suited for this tournament, though he'll need to qualify first. He's got a good, adaptable game for the hard stuff.

Agree he has the weapons to play well on hard courts, but so far he feels much more comfortable on clay

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 10:56 PM
Berdych Beat Roger.Ivan spanked Berdych twice. Does that make ljubo better then Roger.Ivan also beat Nadal.who beat Roger. Does that make Ljubo better then Roger.
NO!! h2h vs other players DONT MEAN SHIT. :worship:

^ still right ;)

adeegee
03-21-2005, 10:56 PM
Berdych Beat Roger.Ivan spanked Berdych twice. Does that make ljubo better then Roger.Ivan also beat Nadal.who beat Roger. Does that make Ljubo better then Roger.
NO!! h2h vs other players DONT MEAN SHIT. :worship:

well if you want head to head vs the actual players maybe have a look

Nadal vs Federer, Nadal leads 1-0
Nadal vs Roddick, Tied 1-1

Now go have a look at Ljubicic's record, and stuff it where the sun don't shine :rolleyes:

Domino
03-21-2005, 10:57 PM
Another guy who has weak memory. You can read Roger words after the match if u want, he felt bad against Davy BUT NOT against Nadal. He said Nadal was just too good for him that day. SIMPLE. I also watched the match so you can keep that bullshit about an injured Roger for yourselves

And I watched the match too, Roger hit way too many unforced errors; much more than he usually does.

Anyways, this is a moot point. One match doesn't show whether you can play well on a surface. Are you saying Mardy Fish must be a good calycourter since he beat Robredo on Clay? I'm not saying you are, but one match in a career is nothing to make a statement on.

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 10:58 PM
well if you want head to head vs the actual players maybe have a look

Nadal vs Federer, Nadal leads 1-0
Nadal vs Roddick, Tied 1-1

Now go have a look at Ljubicic's record, and stuff it where the sun don't shine :rolleyes:


Yeah because Ivan goes deeper and plays good players.

Domino
03-21-2005, 10:59 PM
Federer was absolutely fine. Nadal also came extremely close to beating the world no.2 on a hard court in his home grand slam not so long ago. But yeah you're right, he has absolutely no weapons on a hard court

Not trying to badger, but a 0 6 3 6 4 6 loss is not close. Thanks for the affirmation though.

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 11:01 PM
And I watched the match too, Roger hit way too many unforced errors; much more than he usually does.

Anyways, this is a moot point. One match doesn't show whether you can play well on a surface. Are you saying Mardy Fish must be a good calycourter since he beat Robredo on Clay? I'm not saying you are, but one match in a career is nothing to make a statement on.

Well you have showed me your credibility, you think Nadal has no weapons, you think Roger played a bad match against Nadal past year and now you say Nadal only has that good match on hardcourts.... :rolleyes:

adeegee
03-21-2005, 11:01 PM
Yeah because Ivan goes deeper and plays good players.

That doesn't make sense. I forgot what Ivan's record is against the top players? And also his record in Masters Series and Grand Slams :confused: any chance of a reminder?

NATAS81
03-21-2005, 11:01 PM
^ still right ;)

And factor in that H2H reveals many old matches. Federer vs Keifer was 3-3 before Roger took him 6-4 6-1. :worship: :o

Now are you gonna tell me Keifer stands a chance vs Roddick or Ljubi? :crazy: :rolleyes:

If you look at the past six months, you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone with a winning record against the Big Croat. :worship:

adeegee
03-21-2005, 11:02 PM
Not trying to badger, but a 0 6 3 6 4 6 loss is not close. Thanks for the affirmation though.

I was talking about Hewitt at the Australian Open :mad:

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 11:02 PM
Not trying to badger, but a 0 6 3 6 4 6 loss is not close. Thanks for the affirmation though.

Talking bout Hewitt, Have u heard about him? ;)

adeegee
03-21-2005, 11:02 PM
If you look at the past six months, you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone with a winning record against the Big Croat. :worship:

i think roger might have something to say about that :p

NATAS81
03-21-2005, 11:04 PM
i think roger might have something to say about that :p

Oh yes, him again. :worship:

Well, I think it's internationally known around here that all H2H's are out of bounds when it comes to Fed. :wavey:

adeegee
03-21-2005, 11:06 PM
Oh yes, him again. :worship:

Well, I think it's internationally known around here that all H2H's are out of bounds when it comes to Fed. :wavey:

Nadal leads 1-0, and on a hard court which he can't play on :haha:

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 11:06 PM
BTW, people are treating Calleri as a job done here.....

adeegee
03-21-2005, 11:09 PM
BTW, people are treating Calleri as a job done here.....

Deivid don't be silly, of course Ljubicic will win. He's the 2nd best player in the world only Federer can beat him. Everyone else is a formality :rolleyes:

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 11:10 PM
I will root for Calleri to come out and play, it could be funny ;)

adeegee
03-21-2005, 11:12 PM
nadal is CRAP on anything except clay. he will never be number one and never win a slam other than the french.

:rolleyes: here comes another

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 11:12 PM
nadal is CRAP on anything except clay. he will never be number one and never win a slam other than the french.

Thanks, next fool please...

NATAS81
03-21-2005, 11:13 PM
nadal is CRAP on anything except clay. he will never be number one and never win a slam other than the french.

AO ring any bells? The potential and passion are definitely there. :rolleyes:

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 11:15 PM
\\ he will never be number one and never win a slam other than the french.

I agree...anyone in the right mind..cant think of Nadal winning any other GS then French. and i dont see that happening for another 2 or so years.

Domino
03-21-2005, 11:17 PM
Nadal leads 1-0, and on a hard court which he can't play on :haha:

If the H2H were 3-0 or 4-1, you could lay a case. The fact is, Nadal is barely in the positive for his career (albeit a short one) on hardcourts and has only beaten one top 15 player, on the surface during that time.

And yes, he did take Hewitt pretty close, but he also was a point away from losing to Youzhny.

When I say weapons on the surface, throughout the Aus Open it was obvious he couldn't take the ball early on many occasions like he needed to. All the comentators talked about that, and his efforts to do so were stiffled. On a hardcourt against the best attackers, you need to flatten your strokes out when there is an opening, something Coria had somewhat began to do last year in Miami by shorting his swing a bit.

David Kenzie
03-21-2005, 11:18 PM
I agree...anyone in the right mind..cant think of Nadal winning any other GS then French. and i dont see that happening for another 2 or so years.
Yes but to say he can never be N1 is just silly. Moya, Kuerten, and Ferrero have managed that and are labeled as claycourters, so of course Nadal could.

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 11:20 PM
I forgot what Ivan's record is against the top players

Here You go

Safin 2-2
Henman 4-1
Roger 3-7
Roddick 2-5
Moya 3-3
Gaudio 2-3 4matchs on clay
Hewitt 0-1
Agassi 2-1

NATAS81
03-21-2005, 11:21 PM
Here You go

Safin 2-2
Henman 4-1
Roger 3-7
Roddick 2-5
Moya 3-3
Gaudio 2-3 4matchs on clay
Hewitt 0-1
Agassi 2-1

Wasn't he also the last one to take a set off of Federer? :worship: And that's dating back 2 or more tournies! :eek:

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 11:21 PM
Yes but to say he can never be N1 is just silly. Moya, Kuerten, and Ferrero have managed that and are labeled as claycourters, so of course Nadal could.


Those guys have power in there game.. I dont see much of that in Nadals

Domino
03-21-2005, 11:21 PM
Moya, Kuerten, and Ferrero are definitely not claycourters. players who make the finals of slams on at least two different surfaces are not specialists, but good all-surface players. Guga won a MS on Hard, and made the quarters of the U.S., and won the TMC on hard. They worked all around, and not just on clay.

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 11:22 PM
I agree...anyone in the right mind..cant think of Nadal winning any other GS then French. and i dont see that happening for another 2 or so years.

Well, Im in my right mind and I really expect Nadal to win many tourneys in his career both in clay courts and on hard courts. Of course its soon (hes 18) but the kid is moving in the right way, just wait and see. Since then, the more you bash him and raise other worse players, the bigger laughs Ill get. (I consider worse players those who wont achieve so many things as Im convinced Nadal will, and of course, Ljubicic is one of them ;) )

Enough said

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 11:23 PM
okay ladies..Keep talking..i g2g eat. before dining hall closes....College food sucks :)

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 11:24 PM
Well, Im in my right mind and I really expect Nadal to win many tourneys in his career both in clay courts and on hard courts. Of course its soon (hes 18) but the kid is moving in the right way, just wait and see. Since then, the more you bash him and raise other worse players, the bigger laughs Ill get. (I consider worse players those who wont achieve so many things as Im convinced Nadal will, and of course, Ljubicic is one of them ;) )

Enough said


wait did u just say that right now Nadal is a better player then Ljubicic?!?!?! okay get this guy some help soon



im not bashing Nadal..im just saying he's not all that.......yet.

NATAS81
03-21-2005, 11:24 PM
okay ladies..Keep talking..i g2g eat. before dining hall closes....College food sucks :)

Bada-Boom! And the quick counter-puncher is gone! :bolt:

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 11:28 PM
wait did u just say that right now Nadal is a better player then Ljubicic?!?!?! okay get this guy some help soon



im not bashing Nadal..im just saying he's not all that.......yet.

Have u left your glasses on the desk, Croatian fella? ;)

David Kenzie
03-21-2005, 11:29 PM
Moya, Kuerten, and Ferrero are definitely not claycourters. players who make the finals of slams on at least two different surfaces are not specialists, but good all-surface players. Guga won a MS on Hard, and made the quarters of the U.S., and won the TMC on hard. They worked all around, and not just on clay.

I agree, but I don't think any of them had any decent hard court results before they were 20 - 21 years old.

El Legenda
03-21-2005, 11:31 PM
Have u left your glasses on the desk, Croatian fella? ;)

Only 19 dont wear glasses.....hey im older then Nadal...boy have i underachvied so far in my life compered to him.

Domino
03-21-2005, 11:34 PM
Moya made the AO finals when he was 19. Ferrero made the fourth round of the US, quarters of the Olymics, and semis of Paris Indoors when he was 20. That was only two years after turning pro, since he turned pro at 18. Guga as well, though he bloomed a bit later in his career.

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 11:42 PM
However, the fact is that he has a girls serve, terrible volleys and not enough firepower for a guy who tries to win with just a forhand. .

Terrible volleys?? :rolleyes: , You guys are funny... :D

Deivid23
03-21-2005, 11:43 PM
I like to see guys with some touch and feel.

Brilliant!!! :lol:

Domino
03-21-2005, 11:59 PM
No, you made a correct observation; Nadal has poor technique and footwork at the net, preferring to drop his racquet and guide the ball in rather than keeping a firm wrist, bending the knees, and crossing the feet.

Ruski
03-22-2005, 01:37 AM
IF Marat stops being an OAF, and gets his act and head together :o..... He will be the one meeting Roger in the final!!! ;)

Davai Marat!!! :bounce:

Billabong
03-22-2005, 01:54 AM
Very interesting draw:D!!!

flip_fan
03-22-2005, 02:00 AM
nice draw for mark, to bad he doesnt have the form to take advantage of it...

liptea
03-22-2005, 02:51 AM
I agree, but I don't think any of them had any decent hard court results before they were 20 - 21 years old.

Except that Moya reached the Aussie Open final. :confused: Two years after turning pro.

Age has nothing to do with anything.

Maybe I missed it, but why is Clement playing qualifiers?

smucav
03-22-2005, 03:35 AM
Maybe I missed it, but why is Clement playing qualifiers?The cut-off for this event ended up being 86 (77 before 8 players withdrew). Clement was ranked 116 on the direct entry deadline.

World Beater
03-22-2005, 05:27 AM
nice draw for mark, to bad he doesnt have the form to take advantage of it...

Flip is out w/ an injury sustained in a challenger he played with Jan-Mike.

World Beater
03-22-2005, 05:33 AM
Ljubicic at this point in their careers is more of a challenge for roddick than nadal is on hardcourts, however I don't doubt that Nadal will be a nightmare for Roddick in the future. Nadal needs to develop a serve that can hurt his opponent or he has to develop the counterpunching ability of a Nalby/Hewitt to get to the next level and start trading wins with the best players.

Kuerten and Ferrero are very balanced on both wings and hit a heavier ball off both sides. Nadal may be able to match on the forehand side, but not on the backhand yet. Moya has a much better serve than Nadal does. Technique is something that is hard to change at that age. Just ask Roddick, which is why I am worried about Nadal's Bh and his serve. All of the other greats mentioned had great techinique when they were Nadal's age.

World Beater
03-22-2005, 05:34 AM
Oh yes, thank you Domino for the update on Marcos, and Adegee for clarifying yourself.

Ferrero Forever
03-22-2005, 05:54 AM
Nadal can go quite far imo, mabye it's because i'm a fan, but he pushed hewitt to the limit in the AO. But ferrero's 2nd round opponent is scary, even though i like him.

liptea
03-22-2005, 10:55 AM
The cut-off for this event ended up being 86 (77 before 8 players withdrew). Clement was ranked 116 on the direct entry deadline.


Wow. I never realized he was ranked that low now. I didn't even realize that he didn't have his own forum here.

coup-du-cobra
03-22-2005, 11:30 AM
I'm not a fan of Nadal's. However you cannot deny the fact that he's playing incredible for his age. What's more he seems so mature compared to others players on the same age...compare him to Monfils for example.

joske
03-22-2005, 02:15 PM
very true :)

adeegee
03-22-2005, 05:31 PM
Come on Rafa lets show them who's 'Got no firepower'

Roger-No.1
03-22-2005, 11:19 PM
NO!! h2h vs other players DONT MEAN SHIT. :worship:
Yeah, each match is different.

Most people here think Nadal will lose Vs. Rodick.

After their USO match, who wouldn't?

And Nadalfans have said the surface is slow, he does well in Miami, etc...

We'll have to wait and see who was right.