Coincedence or not... [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Coincedence or not...

Aleksa9
05-27-2012, 09:47 PM
AO 2008. Federer - Djokovic
AO 2009. Federer - Djokovic
AO 2010. Federer - Djokovic
AO 2011. Federer - Djokovic
AO 2012. Djokovic - Murray

RG 2008. Nadal - Djokovic
RG 2009. Federer - Djokovic
RG 2010. Nadal - Djokovic
RG 2011. Djokovic - Federer
RG 2012. Djokovic - Federer

W 2008. Federer - Djokovic
W 2009. Federer - Djokovic
W 2010. Federer - Djokovic
W 2011. Djokovic - Federer

USO 2008. Federer - Djokovic
USO 2009. Federer - Djokovic
USO 2010. Federer - Djokovic
USO 2011. Djokovic - Federer

TigerTim
05-27-2012, 09:49 PM
http://images.peliproducts.co.uk/images/staff/20th/sandra_breezer1.jpg

emotion
05-27-2012, 09:50 PM
Rg could be legit, their draws look pretty okay usually though this one is a bit suspicious
USO insanely rigged, AO and Wimby likely are

legolandbridge
05-27-2012, 10:18 PM
why is it better for Grand Slam directors to host a Federer - Djokovic semi rather than the same matchup a couple days later in a final?

Is this an evil-ish plan crafted by Rafito then? He seems to the one to benefit from this most-bizarre tale of a scenario.
Or it could be a coincidence.

Wimbledon will tell us more.

scarecrows
05-27-2012, 10:30 PM
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0a2ozndPZ1qka0z5.gif

Doggy
05-27-2012, 10:38 PM
Federer always draws Djokovic, fuck this shit

Looner
05-27-2012, 10:43 PM
You may be onto something OP. I certainly have never thought about it in this way...

EliSter
05-27-2012, 10:45 PM
Its riged im sure they will meet in wimby semi too, and USO is given , tho i enjoy Olderer-Joker matches...

MIMIC
05-27-2012, 10:50 PM
Not

Also, who ever was responsible for this year's AO draw was probably fired.

DustMan
05-27-2012, 10:56 PM
you are definitely the first person here to notice this trend, congratulations...

emotion
05-28-2012, 12:41 AM
why is it better for Grand Slam directors to host a Federer - Djokovic semi rather than the same matchup a couple days later in a final?

Is this an evil-ish plan crafted by Rafito then? He seems to the one to benefit from this most-bizarre tale of a scenario.
Or it could be a coincidence.

Wimbledon will tell us more.

They are the best match-up in tennis IMO, always great when they meet. But if they are in different halves, they could lose in the SF to Nadal/Murray (HC/grass)/Ferrer (Djokovic only)

Mercury
05-28-2012, 12:48 AM
is this thread really necessary? We have another thread just like it and discussed this extensively..........

v-money
05-28-2012, 03:37 AM
There is no coincidence about:

http://a.espncdn.com/media/motion/2010/1121/dm_101122_mark_brown.jpg
VS
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02174/andy-murray_2174263b.jpg

rafa_maniac
05-28-2012, 03:58 AM
I remember back in 07/08 when Nadal would always draw Nole and there were similar conspiracy theories. Then again when Nadal always got Muray in 09/10 when he was a bigger threat than Nole. People see what they want to see :shrug:

ServeVolley
05-28-2012, 10:41 AM
Of course not. I mean how could it benefit Nadal to get Murray in the semis rather than Federer or Djokovic? It's not like he's an easier opponent or anything. Oh... wait...

Look at who Nadal's had to face in the semis to reach his last six Slam finals and you'll realise something's not right:

Wimbledon 2010 (def. Berdych)
Semis for Nadal - Murray
Semis for Berdych - Djokovic

US Open 2010 (def. Djokovic)
Semis for Nadal - Youzhny
Semis for Djokovic - Federer

French Open 2011 (def. Federer)
Semis for Nadal - Murray
Semis for Djokovic - Federer

Wimbledon 2011 (l. to Djokovic)
Semis for Nadal - Murray
Semis for Djokovic - Tsonga* (would have been Fed but he lost in quarters)

US Open 2011 (l. to Djokovic)

Semis for Nadal - Murray
Semis for Djokovic - Federer

Australian Open 2012 (l. to Djokovic)
Semis for Nadal - Federer
Semis for Djokovic - Murray

Avoiding Federer & Djokovic 5/6 times in these supposedly "random" draws is not a coincidence. And it seems AO12 was just a blip because, what do you know, he's drawn Murray yet again at the French this year! :rolleyes:

Foxy
05-28-2012, 12:28 PM
Fail.

Nadal - Djokovic 18:14 = 32
Nadal - Murray 13:5 = 18

Federer - Djokovic 14:11 = 25
Federer - Murray 7:8 = 15

Djokovic - Murray 8:5 = 13

It looks like Nadal has played Djokovic 7 times more than Federer played Djokovic.
Also Nadal has played Murray 3 times more than Federer played Murray and 5 times more than Djokovic played Murray.
So obviously Nadal is the one who is screwed up by the draws.

Adding to that Nadal - Federer 18:10 = 28 matches...

TennisOnWood
05-28-2012, 12:31 PM
Please call Mulder and Scully

ServeVolley
05-28-2012, 01:05 PM
Fail.

Nadal - Djokovic 18:14 = 32
Nadal - Murray 13:5 = 18

Federer - Djokovic 14:11 = 25
Federer - Murray 7:8 = 15

Djokovic - Murray 8:5 = 13

It looks like Nadal has played Djokovic 7 times more than Federer played Djokovic.
Also Nadal has played Murray 3 times more than Federer played Murray and 5 times more than Djokovic played Murray.
So obviously Nadal is the one who is screwed up by the draws.

Adding to that Nadal - Federer 18:10 = 28 matches...

We're talking about slam draws. :rolleyes:

hiperborejac
05-28-2012, 01:06 PM
After wining AO 2008 Average Serb would think like this: "They put Novak every time in harder half cause whole western world is against us. They don't want to see Serb winning slams so rather see Fedal final, giving Novak harder opponent in particular surface." :) Exception was RG 2009 when they realized that Novak came too close to Nadal (after MAdrid SF) and put Novak in Fed's half to tire him ahead of fresh Nadal. :p Another more realistic possibility is that uncle Tony rigged draws to give Nadal easier way to title. This year they put Novak vs Murray cause they thought that Murray will rise with Lendl and stop Novak's dominance (because Fedal weren't able to). So, everithing is clear :secret:

Aleksa9
06-22-2012, 11:58 AM
Again...hahahah

Absolute Anthropoid
06-22-2012, 11:59 AM
It's rigged yo

Looner
06-22-2012, 12:02 PM
It's obviously random. Anyone who thinks there's a conspiracy is a crazy/idiot/unaware of the real world/mug :o.