How would you feel about Nadal if he only had 1/2 slams [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

How would you feel about Nadal if he only had 1/2 slams

NadalPhan
01-30-2012, 09:43 PM
Be honest

LawrenceOfTennis
01-30-2012, 09:45 PM
1/2 means a half. How would I feel about him if he'd have a half slam? I would feel sorry for him.

theKSHE
01-30-2012, 09:47 PM
Still a disgrace.

Noleta
01-30-2012, 09:47 PM
1/2 means a half. How would I feel about him if he'd have a half slam? I would feel sorry for him.

:lol:

Seriously though,won't change my opinion about him,he's a great competitor,never givee up.:yeah:

NadalPhan
01-30-2012, 09:55 PM
1/2 means a half. How would I feel about him if he'd have a half slam? I would feel sorry for him.

lol, well played, but I think you knew what I meant.

1 or 2 slams....

Jimnik
01-31-2012, 01:07 AM
Be honest
I'm always honest. 1/2 slams is a BIG achievement. In terms of James Cameron movie TITles, your Avatar is TITanic.

Hewitt =Legend
01-31-2012, 01:09 AM
GM :facepalm:

Fedfanforever
01-31-2012, 01:13 AM
still a selfish cheater

asmazif
01-31-2012, 10:34 AM
I'm always honest. 1/2 slams is a BIG achievement. In terms of James Cameron movie TITles, your Avatar is TITanic.

This is just genius for countless reasons :hatoff:

Well, three.

rickcastle
01-31-2012, 10:38 AM
I wouldn't mind Nadal's brutal tennis if it was just being effective on clay courts, which is the only place it should work really. But now, everything seems to play like clay and we don't get to see beautiful attacking tennis anymore :facepalm: I don't even care that he has 6 Roland Garros because he is truly a beast on clay but he had no business winning the career grandslam if everything hadn't been slowed down to a pulp.

nastoff
01-31-2012, 10:40 AM
I'd feel he was a half slam wonder.

Super Djoker
01-31-2012, 11:23 AM
i am asuming this means 1 to 2 slams not half a slam, is being a runner up half a slam? lol. i would think that,s a lot of work for not much reward, instead it,s a lot of work for a lot of reward !

Fujee
01-31-2012, 12:19 PM
He wouldn't he'd definitely have at least 5 French because he earned those, 6th title he was easily beatable but Fed is his GS helper. The 2008 wimbledon he earned fair and square, played amazing that summer. All the others are debatable. So, I feel he's mostly earned his glory, and been lucky on the way too.

manadrainer
01-31-2012, 12:50 PM
I wouldn't mind Nadal's brutal tennis if it was just being effective on clay courts, which is the only place it should work really. But now, everything seems to play like clay and we don't get to see beautiful attacking tennis anymore :facepalm: I don't even care that he has 6 Roland Garros because he is truly a beast on clay but he had no business winning the career grandslam if everything hadn't been slowed down to a pulp.

I feel exactly the same.

finishingmove
01-31-2012, 12:55 PM
He'd work hard to improve and win that other half that eluded him first time around.

Somehow.

Sham Kay
01-31-2012, 01:09 PM
I was about to make a joke then I realised I actually don't understand the question.

Jimnik
06-11-2012, 02:09 PM
I'd feel he was a half slam wonder.
:haha:

I love these threads.

Kiedis
06-11-2012, 02:36 PM
Be honest

:silly: