Australian Open Rd1: Stakhovsky def Marchenko 6-3,6-7,4-6,6-3,7-5 [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Australian Open Rd1: Stakhovsky def Marchenko 6-3,6-7,4-6,6-3,7-5

Knightmace
01-16-2012, 03:37 AM
what a comeback!!!

Nixer
01-16-2012, 03:53 AM
How many MPs did Marchenko have? I think I saw *5-3 40-15 in 5th.. any more?

Certinfy
01-16-2012, 03:54 AM
Wasn't Stakhovsky far ahead in the TB too? :confused:

swanpm20
01-16-2012, 03:56 AM
I saw Stakovsky up 5-0 in the second set breaker and lost that but good effort to bounce back! Not the first time he's won a grand slam match after facing match points.

*Jean*
01-16-2012, 04:20 AM
Sergiy :yeah: much needed win

philosophicalarf
01-16-2012, 04:42 AM
Wasn't Stakhovsky far ahead in the TB too? :confused:

**5-0, loses next 2
**6-3, loses next 3
**7-6, loses next 1
**9-8, loses next 3

:eek:

SelvenluvJo
01-16-2012, 04:49 AM
Marchenko :o

Ad Wim
01-16-2012, 05:49 AM
Yes!

HKz
01-16-2012, 06:15 AM
Stakhovsky makes his GS matches much too difficult.. He seems so relaxed and collected in best of 3 set matches especially when considering he is a perfect 7-0 in ATP finals (singles and doubles combined), then when he plays at the slams, he makes thing way too complicated both mentally and tennis wise.. Really annoying to watch him at the slams, because he has the potential to be a occasional QF and maybe even SF player at the slams.

SKozak
01-16-2012, 06:50 AM
Congrats to both! What a fight!

Dead Net Cord
01-16-2012, 07:28 AM
27 Double faults in Grand Slam Tournament

asmazif
01-16-2012, 01:12 PM
too close Stakky, too close. great win in the end :yeah:

misty1
01-16-2012, 01:18 PM
should not have been this close. he should have had the 2nd set tiebreak but choked badly and honeslty i thought that would be it but im glad he pulled through

Belludal
01-16-2012, 01:20 PM
Great Victory!

Marchenko isn't a mug.

Hian-GOAT
01-16-2012, 07:05 PM
Illiya :sad: He's way better than people thing, with better draws sometimes he would have an easier life :hug: