Pete Sampras analyses the 2011 season

2011 Tennis Season Reviewed In ATP Uncovered with comments by Pete Sampras and Agassi on the Top 4. :)

svNseCyDO6s&feature=player_embedded

Sampras was quite spot on with his analysis. About Djokovic's season. Incredible really and later in the video that comment was aptly made about Murray too. that the victory against Nadal in Tokyo showed that he had talent.

Sampras was quite spot on with his analysis. About Djokovic's season. Incredible really and later in the video that comment was aptly made about Murray too. that the victory against Nadal in Tokyo showed that he had talent.

But who didn't know that already, seriously? That Murray hasn't been able to win any slam doesn't mean that he hasn't got the talent to do it. Even if he went all his career slamless he would still be one of the most talented players to play the game.

But who didn't know that already, seriously? That Murray hasn't been able to win any slam doesn't mean that he hasn't got the talent to do it. Even if he went all his career slamless he would still be one of the most talented players to play the game.

Actually i always thought Sampras was a dull and dour personality. It was quite insightful from him to be honest.

Great video. Why is Andy Murray included in this discussion?

I think Del Potro has just as much a chance of success in 2012 as Andy, and Potro has proven that he is mentally tough enough.

But who didn't know that already, seriously? That Murray hasn't been able to win any slam doesn't mean that he hasn't got the talent to do it. Even if he went all his career slamless he would still be one of the most talented players to play the game.

Not really, the technical weaknesses in his game are quite obvious. The common school of thought is that Mugray can't win a slam because he's mentally weak - that is incorrect. He can't win a slam because he's a pusher.

Not really, the technical weaknesses in his game are quite obvious. The common school of thought is that Mugray can't win a slam because he's mentally weak - that is incorrect. He can't win a slam because he's a pusher.

Everybody has technical weaknesses. Nobody is perfect. Like Nadal whose game is barely watchable. Can never understand how anybody can become a Nadal fan. Murray at least has talent to watch him.

People, seriously, no one and i mean no one can succeed at the top without huge amounts of TALENT. When people say a player is talentless it makes me laugh, it's so ludicrous and so untrue. Just to break in the Top 100 of the world makes you hugely talented, and to be in the top 4 means that you're amongst the best 4 players in the whole wide world. Just think about that and tell me again they have no talent.

Dont waste your typing skills Nole fan , some people on here just cant grasp it

Actually i always thought Sampras was a dull and dour personality. It was quite insightful from him to be honest.

He was very focus and competitive during his prime. Nowadays, he is very relax and playful in the championship series/senior tour. Except may be playing vs Agassi :lol:

People, seriously, no one and i mean no one can succeed at the top without huge amounts of TALENT. When people say a player is talentless it makes me laugh, it's so ludicrous and so untrue. Just to break in the Top 100 of the world makes you hugely talented, and to be in the top 4 means that you're amongst the best 4 players in the whole wide world. Just think about that and tell me again they have no talent.
It's all relatively. Murray is not a mug, but he's a relative mug compared to Fedalovic. Of course things can change if Murray has a transformation similar to Nole 2011.

People, seriously, no one and i mean no one can succeed at the top without huge amounts of TALENT. When people say a player is talentless it makes me laugh, it's so ludicrous and so untrue. Just to break in the Top 100 of the world makes you hugely talented, and to be in the top 4 means that you're amongst the best 4 players in the whole wide world. Just think about that and tell me again they have no talent.

Murray is being compared to multi slam winners when gauging talent, not to top 100 players.

Nina, Determination and physical prowess along with great coaching can break you into Top 4. Talent is no longer required in these condition. And i know you wont agree with it.

Nina, Determination and physical prowess along with great coaching can break you into Top 4. Talent is no longer required in these condition. And i know you wont agree with it.

Obviously I don't agree with that. If it was down to it, ANYONE could be in the Top 4. Anyone. No way, mate, you've got it all wrong. Don't confuse a style that bores you with lack of talent. Style is style, everyone's got a different one, but talent means skills, and to succeed in this super competitive sport that we call tennis, you need better skills than everyone else. Only a very selective few can play tennis like these guys.

Obviously I don't agree with that. If it was down to it, ANYONE could be in the Top 4. Anyone. No way, mate, you've got it all wrong. Don't confuse a style that bores you with lack of talent. Style is style, everyone's got a different one, but talent means skills, and to succeed in this super competitive sport that we call tennis, you need better skills than everyone else. Only a very selective few can play tennis like these guys.


I can bet everything on it. if you have those things from an early age, anyone can do it. i repeat under THESE CONDITIONS.

And you can only tell the difference between a talented and a physical player if you have played the game.

I think Topspindoctor knows more about tennis than 90% of MTF

I think Topspindoctor knows more about tennis than 90% of MTF

You probably think Shinoj is a genius.

You probably think Shinoj is a genius.

I dont think anyone is genius here LOL....but the Doc knows his shit ...

"Novak pretty much steamrolled everyone".

Agreed.

"Novak pretty much steamrolled everyone".

Agreed.

very short and sweet review

Murray is being compared to multi slam winners when gauging talent, not to top 100 players.
Maybe you should compare Murray with other single slam winners, considering we're talking about the ability to win a slam.

I can bet everything on it. if you have those things from an early age, anyone can do it. i repeat under THESE CONDITIONS.
Yeah, but don't pretty much all top tennis players have these things? If everyone trains super hard from an early age, then it's not an advantage; it's something you need to do to stand a chance.

I think Sampras has ran out of money.

Nina, Determination and physical prowess along with great coaching can break you into Top 4. Talent is no longer required in these condition. And i know you wont agree with it.there arent enough facepalms in the world..

there arent enough facepalms in the world..

this

Nina, Determination and physical prowess along with great coaching can break you into Top 4. Talent is no longer required in these condition. And i know you wont agree with it.

I can bet everything on it. if you have those things from an early age, anyone can do it. i repeat under THESE CONDITIONS.

Seek help man.
If you want to make it to top 100 in the world, let alone top 4, you have to be super talented. No matter how much you work, some people just don't have the talent for it.

I think Topspindoctor knows more about tennis than 90% of MTF

What the fuck? He just says the obvious. He is of course hilariously retarded. :lol:

He repeats too much and he uses word mug all his posts, so level of brainfunction cant be high.

I just hope he aint coming to defend his lousy ass, what a loser. :lol:

What the fuck? He just says the obvious. He is of course hilariously retarded. :lol:

He repeats too much and he uses word mug all his posts, so level of brainfunction cant be high.

I just hope he aint coming to defend his lousy ass, what a loser. :lol:

Doc is very smart ....and when he says someone is a mug he is a mug........

What the fuck? He just says the obvious. He is of course hilariously retarded. :lol:

He repeats too much and he uses word mug all his posts, so level of brainfunction cant be high.

I just hope he aint coming to defend his lousy ass, what a loser. :lol:

You're a butthurt Del Potro fan who's angry that I constantly expose him for a fluke and a clown that he is :lol: No need to get angry, bro.

he said about Nadal "had a good year not a great year"

this same guy who said "anytime you win a GS its a great year"
make up your mind El Pistolero

You people are mistaking athletic ability for talent. talent is the grace with which the tennis player hits the ball. You can see that in Federer, Nalbandian, Murray, Safin and so on. But that is NOT the case with Nadal. His game is pure UGLY.

I repeat you can only tell the difference if you have played the game or any other outdoor sports long enough to spot it.

You people are mistaking athletic ability for talent. talent is the grace with which the tennis player hits the ball. You can see that in Federer, Nalbandian, Murray, Safin and so on. But that is NOT the case with Nadal. His game is pure UGLY.

I repeat you can only tell the difference if you have played the game or any other outdoor sports long enough to spot it.

You don't half come out with some absolute bollocks. You're either a muppet or a very convincing troll.

You don't half come out with some absolute bollocks. You're either a muppet or a very convincing troll.


If you dont have any argument why dont you just Fuck off

If you dont have any argument why dont you just Fuck off

Because I like posting here. Despite the balance of non-tennis specific physical abilities and tennis specific talents leaning increasingly toward non-tennis specific abilities relatively in comparison to past times, it's ludicrous to posit that that alone can get you to the top of the sport.

So, like I said, you're either a raving idiot or a beautifully crafted troll.

Because I like posting here. Despite the balance of non-tennis specific physical abilities and tennis specific talents leaning increasingly toward non-tennis specific abilities relatively in comparison to past times, it's ludicrous to posit that that alone can get you to the top of the sport.

So, like I said, you're either a raving idiot or a beautifully crafted troll.



You are saying it yourself it is leaning. It is uncomfortable for you to believe in it now. But that's what is happening. Prima facie is Nadal and Toni.

And cut out the insults For fuck sake. I don't believe in giving Bad Rep but that is what i have to do now.

Nina, Determination and physical prowess along with great coaching can break you into Top 4. Talent is no longer required in these condition. And i know you wont agree with it.

Determination and physical prowess are also talent... Idiot!!!

You are saying it yourself it is leaning. It is uncomfortable for you to believe in it now. But that's what is happening. Prima facie is Nadal and Toni.

And cut out the insults For fuck sake. I don't believe in giving Bad Rep but that is what i have to do now.

There is absolutely no discomfort whatsoever in me believing that is it is leaning increasingly to that at all. I have made mention of it several times. Anyway, some people aspire to become a beautifully crafted troll.

P.s. please throw some bad rep my way, for varieties sake if you wouldn't mind.

Determination and physical prowess are also talent... Idiot!!!

Largely non-tennis specific.

Incredible is the ignorance of noticing a naturally gifted player in these parts. Its shameful really. But then what do you expect in an internet forum.

Nobody becomes a great tennis player without a huge determination. No matter how "talented" you are...

There is absolutely no discomfort whatsoever in me believing that is it is leaning increasingly to that at all. I have made mention of it several times. Anyway, some people aspire to become a beautifully crafted troll.

P.s. please throw some bad rep my way, for varieties sake if you wouldn't mind.


You get really happy by getting Good rep from kids.Eh ?:lol:

Talent is not about style you hit the ball, its about winning matches..You can get a good technigue with good coaching, but if you cant win matches with your good technigue you are not talented. There are lots of players who hits the ball well but are not able to win matches... They are not talented.

Talent is not about style you hit the ball, its about winning matches..You can get a good technigue with good coaching, but if you cant win matches with your good technigue you are not talented. There are lots of players who hits the ball well but are not able to win matches... They are not talented.
Nonsense. Talent is about having the ability to achieve something. Success is actually achieving it. Talent != Success.

Talent is not about style you hit the ball, its about winning matches..You can get a good technigue with good coaching, but if you cant win matches with your good technigue you are not talented. There are lots of players who hits the ball well but are not able to win matches... They are not talented.

Great another clown who can't see past anything but results.

You get really happy by getting Good rep from kids.Eh ?:lol:

No it's boring, that's why I'd like a bit of red to keep the scene fresh.

If you dont have any argument why dont you just Fuck offFedulltards never have explanation.No logic:lol:

Fedulltards never have explanation.No logic:lol:


No,once upon a time he had mono when he was 16. thats why he is declining.:lol:

Such a weak video. My left pinky could give a better analysis of the 2011 season.

Hey, let's string together a bunch of random clips of Sampras and Agassi making general comments about the last year in tennis.

i think Sampras is the most overrated player off court:o, who gives a shit what he thinks, go and play in your champions tour and stop talking:rolleyes:

i think Sampras is the most overrated player off court:o, who gives a shit what he thinks, go and play in your champions tour and stop talking:rolleyes:

dont be so primitive sweetheart ;)