Rafa-Roger question to the experts here... [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Rafa-Roger question to the experts here...

Manequin75
06-06-2010, 09:36 PM
Someone just bought to my attention that rafa nadal has never ever successfully defended a non-clay court title and roger federer has never ever sucessfully defended a clay court title.

I am hoping if someone here could confirm this or provide an instance which refutes the above.

Many thanks

samanosuke
06-06-2010, 09:40 PM
I don't know and don't care for rafa but Roger defended Hamburg tittle in 2005

Roamed
06-06-2010, 09:40 PM
Roger defended his Hamburg 04 win in 05 I believe. Might have the years wrong but yes Roger definitely defended it some time.

Edit: Yeah that is right, he beat Coria in the final in 04 and Gasquet in 05.

He's twice been in the final and lost attempting to defend, both times to Rafa, in Hamburg 08 after winning it in 07 and Madrid 10 after winning it in 09

Sunset of Age
06-06-2010, 09:47 PM
Roger defended his Hamburg 04 win in 05 I believe. Might have the years wrong but yes Roger definitely defended it some time.

Edit: Yeah that is right, he beat Coria in the final in 04 and Gasquet in 05.

He's twice been in the final and lost attempting to defend, both times to Rafa, in Hamburg 08 after winning it in 07 and Madrid 10 after winning it in 09

This is correct and as far as I know indeed the only clay tournament which he ever managed to defend.

Roamed
06-06-2010, 10:07 PM
This is correct and as far as I know indeed the only clay tournament which he ever managed to defend.

Yep :)

And to answer the second part of your question Rafa hasn't managed it yet, the closest he's got so far was winning Indian Wells twice in three years (07, 09).

ApproachShot
06-06-2010, 10:18 PM
Of the multiple times Nadal has won a non-clay tournament, he has won Indian Wells, Miami and Canada Masters twice each, but never consecutively. The earliest he can amend this is at Shanghai this year.

Yes, Federer has successfully defended his title in Hamburg on clay - winning in 2004 and 2005. He also won the same tournament in 2002 and 2007. Furthermore, he was only 1 set away from defending his 2003 clay title in Gstaad during 2004 (he lost to Jiri Novak 7-5 3-6 3-6 6-1 3-6). He's also managed to appear in other consecutive finals in clay tournaments a number of times - for example at the French Open, Madrid, Monte Carlo and Rome - but at least one of the losses at these tournaments came to Nadal.

SheepleBuster
06-07-2010, 12:35 AM
Yes man. Who cares about what Rafa has done. He is not at Roger's level. I mean 16 slams to 7. And Rafa didn't have to face higher than a 5 seed to win his last title. haha. Joke of a champion. That's not defending the title. That's like Sarkozy giving the title in gift wrap to Nadal

luie
06-07-2010, 12:50 AM
Yes man. Who cares about what Rafa has done. He is not at Roger's level. I mean 16 slams to 7. And Rafa didn't have to face higher than a 5 seed to win his last title. haha. Joke of a champion. That's not defending the title. That's like Sarkozy giving the title in gift wrap to Nadal
Nope its because,he is not injured,not fatigued,he has gotten over his parents split,shakira inspired him,he wanted to teach the "evil french' crowd a lesson. etc. etc.
BTW talking about rafa's parents where is MR.RAFATARD .this clay season SAWAN.:confused:

Matt01
06-07-2010, 12:59 AM
Yes man. Who cares about what Rafa has done. He is not at Roger's level. I mean 16 slams to 7. And Rafa didn't have to face higher than a 5 seed to win his last title. haha. Joke of a champion. That's not defending the title. That's like Sarkozy giving the title in gift wrap to Nadal


Wow, you're one hell of a clown. :worship:

A_Skywalker
06-07-2010, 01:00 AM
Yes man. Who cares about what Rafa has done. He is not at Roger's level. I mean 16 slams to 7. And Rafa didn't have to face higher than a 5 seed to win his last title. haha. Joke of a champion. That's not defending the title. That's like Sarkozy giving the title in gift wrap to Nadal

Its not like he can have 16 slams at 24 :o

SheepleBuster
06-07-2010, 01:02 AM
Its not like he can have 16 slams at 24 :o

He won't win more than 2 more. If he does, I'll leave TMF forever. I'll stop watching tennis and leave US to mountains

Manequin75
06-07-2010, 01:03 AM
Yes man. Who cares about what Rafa has done. He is not at Roger's level. I mean 16 slams to 7. And Rafa didn't have to face higher than a 5 seed to win his last title. haha. Joke of a champion. That's not defending the title. That's like Sarkozy giving the title in gift wrap to Nadal

Thanks to everybody for their inputs except this guy whose response doesnt even address the question.

SheepleBuster
06-07-2010, 01:03 AM
Nope its because,he is not injured,not fatigued,he has gotten over his parents split,shakira inspired him,he wanted to teach the "evil french' crowd a lesson. etc. etc.
BTW talking about rafa's parents where is MR.RAFATARD .this clay season SAWAN.:confused:

Shakira. That's why.

Manequin75
06-07-2010, 01:05 AM
He won't win more than 2 more. If he does, I'll leave TMF forever. I'll stop watching tennis and leave US to mountains

There you will meet nadal on one of his hiking trips and maybe you come back a rafatard lol

SheepleBuster
06-07-2010, 01:08 AM
There you will meet nadal on one of his hiking trips and maybe you come back a rafatard lol

If Rafa goes over 9 slams, I'll change my name and sacrifice my first born son to the gods from Sirius. :devil:

Persimmon
06-07-2010, 03:45 AM
He won't win more than 2 more. If he does, I'll leave TMF forever. I'll stop watching tennis and leave US to mountains

I think Rafa will win like 10 slams.

partygirl
06-07-2010, 04:36 AM
why can't they have babies?!:mad: