Choosing to serve/receive when winning the toss? [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Choosing to serve/receive when winning the toss?

lleytonfan!
04-20-2010, 02:46 AM
Which players do which? I know that Federer and Roddick pretty much always choose to serve, and Nadal to receive. Lleyton mostly chooses to receive, although I've seen him choose to serve at times. Same with Djokovic.

-Valhalla-
04-20-2010, 03:13 AM
Last year at Madrid, Fed won the toss but elected to receive against Rafa ... a subtle, yet crafty psychological ploy.

Pirata.
04-20-2010, 03:14 AM
I've heard some players choose to receive so they can try for an early break.

duong
04-20-2010, 06:27 AM
I've heard some players choose to receive so they can try for an early break.

yes actually I think it's a good idea as I see many breaks in first game.
Also in second game but less.

Then I think it may be a better idea to receive first.

The counter-argument is that in the end of the set, it's better psychologically to be the first to serve to force the opponent to serve to stay in the set.

And that advantage can even extend to the next set.

HKz
04-20-2010, 07:23 AM
yes actually I think it's a good idea as I see many breaks in first game.
Also in second game but less.

Then I think it may be a better idea to receive first.

The counter-argument is that in the end of the set, it's better psychologically to be the first to serve to force the opponent to serve to stay in the set.

And that advantage can even extend to the next set.

That is if you are a good/quick starter or can quickly serve that first game to bed. Or sometimes many top players use that first game or two to really find that rhythm and try to get into long rallies. Even if they get broken in the first game, I don't think they really care that much unless it is against a big server or whatever.

I know in Federer's case, since 2008 or so, he has had trouble finding that rhythm off his first serve and forehand early on in matches. It isn't like pre-2008 Federer where he would get a good two aces or so in the first game. It has increasingly become dangerous for him to serve first than prior years. I mean these days it appears he can barely get his first serve in the first game and his forehand goes absolutely wild. But then again, I don't think he is really there 100% mentally in non-Slam events regardless..

alter ego
04-20-2010, 07:26 AM
I've heard some players choose to receive so they can try for an early break.

Federer's last match so far against Berdych. Fed won the toss, and choose the side with the wind on his back, Birdbrain then choose to serve (against the wind obviously). No need to say that Fed broke. :D

szelesvigyor
04-20-2010, 07:40 AM
I always choose to receive , because : then i can serve after the sidechanges , so before serve i always have 1 minute to rest , and then when the opponent serves , he becomes a bit more tired , and i can try to break him. serve needs more energy than receiving.

duong
04-20-2010, 08:19 AM
I always choose to receive , because : then i can serve after the sidechanges , so before serve i always have 1 minute to rest , and then when the opponent serves , he becomes a bit more tired , and i can try to break him. serve needs more energy than receiving.

yes it's also a good argument ;)

Especially Tsonga should always choose to receive against Nadal, since his problem against him is that he gets so angry after Nadal's serves (time to serve + difficulty to break him) that he dashes off his serve :lol:

I have the impression from my late memories that Youzhny also prefers serving after sidechange for the same reason.

I know in Federer's case, since 2008 or so, he has had trouble finding that rhythm off his first serve and forehand early on in matches. It isn't like pre-2008 Federer where he would get a good two aces or so in the first game. It has increasingly become dangerous for him to serve first than prior years. I mean these days it appears he can barely get his first serve in the first game and his forehand goes absolutely wild. But then again, I don't think he is really there 100% mentally in non-Slam events regardless..

yes traditionnally Federer preferred serving first, I think because he can put pressure on the opponent's serve and mind when he serves to stay in the set. Also because he used to be a very good starter.

But now he becomes old, and old players are rustier :lol: .He's more and more often broken in first game because of what you say. Maybe more outside of slams, but it also happens in slams, for instance against Davydenko in Melbourne, he saved his serve at the extreme limit in first game, whereas he had given him his serve when serving first in Doha.

Berdych also has problems to start, and has been fragile in many of the starts I saw from him recently.

duong
04-20-2010, 08:31 AM
I think against a big server, I know especially Tsonga, it can be good to choose to receive first, as these players are very hard to break but in first game, there may be an opportunity if they’re not fully into the match.

Especially I’ve seen Tsonga lose his first serving game quite a couple of times.