Henman and Agassi Put Pressure on Murray

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/8054672.stm

Comical Interview

Thanx 4 link

Murray is cool:)

It was pretty funny. I like that Murray admitted that Andre was his fav with Henman right there.

Very nice :)

It was pretty funny. I like that Murray admitted that Andre was his fav with Henman right there.
Huh, that was one tough choice.

Huh, that was one tough choice.

Yah very tough decision for a kid to make. Snotty upperclass English wanker vs all American cool.

LOL murray couldn't stop saying "pink shorts"

When Sue said something like: "Federer is a set up and 4-3 in the 2nd with the break"... The crowd starting cheering =/

When Sue said something like: "Federer is a set up and 4-3 in the 2nd with the break"... The crowd starting cheering =/

They would have cheered if Sue said "Nadal is a set up and 4-3 in the 2nd with the break" too :)

When Sue said something like: "Federer is a set up and 4-3 in the 2nd with the break"... The crowd starting cheering =/

we know whom they would cheer for in the final ;)

They would have cheered if Sue said "Nadal is a set up and 4-3 in the 2nd with the break" too :)

No.

Yeah right, when Nadal won Wimbledon the crowd went dead silent....and they didn't cheer when he won the 1st 2 sets:rolleyes:
http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200807/r268846_1127397.jpg

we know whom they would cheer for in the final ;)



No.


Roger is popular in England, but Rafa also. Only in Paris it seems they don't like Nadal at all.

Yeah right, when Nadal won Wimbledon the crowd went dead silent....and they didn't cheer when he won the 1st 2 sets:rolleyes:

they were afraid if they didn't he would topspin them to death, Vamos!

Roger is popular in England, but Rafa also. Only in Paris it seems they don't like Nadal at all.

you will see this year for whom they will cheer the most, also try watching the 5th set of last year's final and see whom they were cheering for.

Nice guy this Murray

Murray is so cute and funny :hearts:

Yah very tough decision for a kid to make. Snotty upperclass English wanker vs all American cool.

shhh child

and agassi all american? :haha:

Andy:hearts::hearts::hearts:love him

Agassi was funny after he beat Henman, when they told him he leads head2head 3-2 now and he points to Henman and says "hey yeah remember....take that Tim take that"

Agassi was funny after he beat Henman, when they told him he leads head2head 3-2 now and he points to Henman and says "hey yeah remember....take that Tim take that"

someone has link (with video) to that match? i mean Agassi vs. Henman?

Actually, it was Sue Barker who put pressure on him that day, saying "we want you to win here" in front of 27 thousand people sitting there and who knows how many watching on TV.

cant see anything wrong about putting some pressure on someone who is making so much money.

I've watched the 5th set. The crowd was cheering for both men with abandon. It was one of the things that endear that match to me. When Nadal won, the crowd was in an uproar. They were cheering both - and rightfully so. Spectacular match.

They would have cheered if Sue said "Nadal is a set up and 4-3 in the 2nd with the break" too :)

Roger is popular in England, but Rafa also. Only in Paris it seems they don't like Nadal at all.

would they have also cheered like this if Nadal won Madrid?

ss7LgReg-ho

doubt it.

Nadull is disliked by EVERYONE (with eyes and ears intact). All the Nadulltards in this forum are Toni's henchmen.

No.

Yes.

Yes of course the Wimbledon crowd would have cheered if Nadal won Madrid, however they wouldn't have cheered as loud as they did for Federer. You know why? Because people feel sorry for Federer, because Federer is very sensitive and weak as we saw at the Aus Open, its like how people feel sorry for a 3-year-old if they had no parents. So that is why Federer would probably get a bigger cheer for winning Madrid, plus people would see how big the achievement was to beat Nadal on clay. But there is no malice directed at Nadal, and Nadal would have been cheered by the Wimbledon crowd if he'd won Madrid.

Yes of course the Wimbledon crowd would have cheered if Nadal won Madrid, however they wouldn't have cheered as loud as they did for Federer. You know why? Because people feel sorry for Federer, because Federer is very sensitive and weak as we saw at the Aus Open, its like how people feel sorry for a 3-year-old if they had no parents. So that is why Federer would probably get a bigger cheer for winning Madrid, plus people would see how big the achievement was to beat Nadal on clay. But there is no malice directed at Nadal, and Nadal would have been cheered by the Wimbledon crowd if he'd won Madrid.

you seem to forget who is the fan-favorite player in the world, not to mention he was the clear underdog in Madrid's final, it has nothing to do with pity or feeling sorry.

You are delusional if you think people don't feel sorry for Federer. Even I feel sorry for Federer, not sorry enough to gift him a slam but there is no doubt how pathetic Federer's fractured ego is and how hard it is to enjoy his demise.

You are delusional if you think people don't feel sorry for Federer. Even I feel sorry for Federer, not sorry enough to gift him a slam but there is no doubt how pathetic Federer's fractured ego is and how hard it is to enjoy his demise.

:lol:

Pretty sure people like Federer because he plays beautiful tennis, and is a legend of the game.