Is Murray just another Tim Henman? [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Is Murray just another Tim Henman?

tennishero
01-26-2009, 09:32 AM
both reached 4th ranking, and both failed on the big stage lol

jazar
01-26-2009, 09:49 AM
henman was and always will be far superior to murray

Clydey
01-26-2009, 09:51 AM
Yes, he's just another Henman. You know, despite achieving more by the age of 21 than Henman did in his whole career. :)

Nathaliia
01-26-2009, 09:51 AM
Henman was more of a gentleman :awww:

leng jai
01-26-2009, 09:51 AM
Clydey is a busy boy tonight.

Stensland
01-26-2009, 09:52 AM
henman's game was much better to watch. he was an attacking kind of player whereas murray's just trying to euthanise the opposition and audience alike. :awww:

reggie1
01-26-2009, 09:54 AM
God I hope not. I think Murray has more fire in his belly than Henman ever did.

Clydey
01-26-2009, 09:55 AM
Clydey is a busy boy tonight.

It's 11am. Fuck all else to do, like. :lol:

JolánGagó
01-26-2009, 09:59 AM
Why would he be? Muzza's already achieved more than Henman and Haas put together in their whole careers.

Why is this stupidest thread allowed in this forum? This is a hating thread with the only purpose of stuffing our hearts with ill feelings until they explode :sad: Mods, please obliterate this evil thread from the face of Earth or at least move it to the challenger forums, thank you.

Crazy Girl
01-26-2009, 10:00 AM
Murray is Murray.
Henman is Henman.
People, don't look for nothing else....

leng jai
01-26-2009, 10:01 AM
Somehow Haas is mentioned again. This JolanGago is good.

JolánGagó
01-26-2009, 10:03 AM
Somehow Haas is mentioned again. This JolanGago is good.

I ain't good, Im racist.

TheBoiledEgg
01-26-2009, 10:04 AM
Henman = upper class twat
Murray = boring dour twat

whats the similarity ?

rocketassist
01-26-2009, 10:15 AM
Henman = upper class twat
Murray = boring dour twat

whats the similarity ?

British. Apart from the two scouse twats, do you like ANY British sportsmen?

Chileno
01-26-2009, 10:17 AM
Nope. Murray is better...he has some fire in him.

Bernard Black
01-26-2009, 10:22 AM
No.

Hope this helps.

Sebby
01-26-2009, 11:09 AM
Murray will win a Slam.

shotgun
01-26-2009, 12:29 PM
Let's give Murray some more time before he's compared to massively overrated Henman.

rocketassist
01-26-2009, 12:32 PM
Let's give Murray some more time before he's compared to massively overrated Henman.

I woulda thought Henman's game appealed to you :lol:

Henman maximised his ability, I don't care what anyone says, his forehand was too up and down and his serve wasn't reliable enough to be a slam winner.

lavar78
01-26-2009, 12:36 PM
Murray has a long way to go before he reaches Tim's status. Call me when he reaches the semifinals of 3 out of 4 slams.

Venle
01-26-2009, 12:37 PM
Murray is capable to win Slams and I like his game.
But I don't really care for his personality.

shotgun
01-26-2009, 12:38 PM
I woulda thought Henman's game appealed to you :lol:

Henman maximised his ability, I don't care what anyone says, his forehand was too up and down and his serve wasn't reliable enough to be a slam winner.

I didn't mind his game, just the hype surrounding him was unbearable, considering it was someone who had never even reached a Slam final. ;)

Agree on the second part of your post.

Gandalf
01-26-2009, 12:57 PM
Of course not, even if I like Henman's game more I believe that Murray is going to win slams and be number 1. This is just a temporary setback.

NyGeL
01-26-2009, 03:47 PM
He means becouse they are both british heros but can't win Grand Slams.

I agree with that.

But of course, Henman was much more likely.

Snowwy
01-26-2009, 04:06 PM
British. Apart from the two scouse twats, do you like ANY British sportsmen?

I don't think he likes any sportsmen..

Cricketics
01-26-2009, 04:14 PM
Na, Murray is too young and still hanging in there in every slam to reach and give fight to the opponent. However, Henman was just not that good. He was an overrated player who never used to dominate as much as it was made out to be

Arhaych
01-26-2009, 04:47 PM
Murray will, over the span of his career, acheive more than Henman has done.

sammy01
01-26-2009, 04:54 PM
God I hope not. I think Murray has more fire in his belly than Henman ever did.

i agree, the word that sums up henman was 'nice', nice game, nice guy, nice wife, nice career. murray is more gritty and determined.

groundstroke
01-26-2009, 05:02 PM
Henman was more naturally talented and more interesting to watch. He was also more professional, never sulked and his s&v style was great to watch but Murray.... ermm

I'd rather watch Henman any day over the Scot clown.

denisgiann
01-26-2009, 05:12 PM
He is better than Murray and he ll achieve more in his career but he isnt number one material for sure.If he had a different nationality i dont even think there would be even one fourth of the current hype surrounding his name:cool:.

reggie1
01-26-2009, 05:14 PM
I think Henman was a good player but as a Brit watching him and rooting for him (desperately so at Wimbledon) I always knew that he would only ever get so far. Semi final's usually, which is nothing to be ashamed of of course but you knew that was it.
With Murray, I always feel that there is a real chance that he will make a big breakthrough at some point and win a slam. I am not saying this just because he is British, I would think this whatever his nationality.
I don't know how much Murray was funded by the LTA but I would imagine that he must have come from quite a wealthy family too, like Henman as the LTA are awful and don't part with their money easily, unless it's paying some big name to advertise and promote a sport which very few people in this country can afford to play right now. They don't spend their money where it is needed imo.

ChinoRios4Ever
01-26-2009, 05:58 PM
Murray reached a GS final :shrug:

Xavier7
01-26-2009, 06:11 PM
I woulda thought Henman's game appealed to you :lol:

Henman maximised his ability, I don't care what anyone says, his forehand was too up and down and his serve wasn't reliable enough to be a slam winner.

Henman had his chance in 2001.
Ivanisevic and Rafter were both past their best by then I feel he could have beaten them both.
I think Murray is certainly better than him though.

holagirl56
01-26-2009, 07:51 PM
OMFG, IT WAS ONE LOSS. Jesus, I hate how after every loss/win someone finds the need to make one of these idiotic threads.

:rolleyes:

safin-rules-no.1
01-26-2009, 08:00 PM
henman was and always will be far superior to murray

Plus Henman had class, this thing has none.

MURRAY IS A LOSERRRRRRRRRRRR hahahahahahahaha :D

Henry Kaspar
01-26-2009, 08:05 PM
Well Murray has already achieved more by reaching a GS final. Also, Henman never sent shudders down the spine of #1-3, even when he was ranked #4.

Murray had a setback, but I still expect him to achieve quite a bit in his career. The guy is here to stay.

JolánGagó
01-26-2009, 08:08 PM
Plus Henman had class, this thing has none.

You wouldn't know class if it bite you in the ass ;)

:hug:

Federerhingis
01-26-2009, 08:09 PM
OMFG, IT WAS ONE LOSS. Jesus, I hate how after every loss/win someone finds the need to make one of these idiotic threads.

:rolleyes:

Yeah I would say it's too soon to make such bold affirmations. In a sense Roger was right, Murray may be the in form player coming into the tournament but grand slams are more about mentality and experience. Murray is just a little inexperienced even at this stage, he is much too talented and I assume this will only further motivate him. Remember Roger lost in the first round the next year at Wimbledon after having that great win over Sampras, he also lost immediately in the quarters that same year after beating Sampras. It takes maturity, courage and experience to win slams, plus a little talent doesn't hurt. ;)

ORGASMATRON
01-26-2009, 08:10 PM
Stupid thread, of course he's wayyy better then Henman. Henman was terribly soft, typical gutless English gentlewoman. I dont like Murray but least his got some balls.

General Suburbia
01-26-2009, 08:42 PM
Murray got to a GS final. Automatically better than Henman.

KaiserT
01-26-2009, 08:45 PM
Ridiculous thread.

MsTree
01-26-2009, 08:49 PM
Ridiculous thread. A platform for small minded xenophobic nonsense spouted by bitter insecure people who can't bear to admit that a small neighbouring country with less than a tenth of the population could possibly produce a sportsman with more talent and potential than the last nearly-was they coughed up.
Safin-rules-no.1 and Jazar - I would like to know if you hate Murray because he's Scottish or because he's not English? Do you often make judgements on someone's sporting ability based on their nationality?

safin-rules-no.1
01-26-2009, 08:57 PM
Ridiculous thread. A platform for small minded xenophobic nonsense spouted by bitter insecure people who can't bear to admit that a small neighbouring country with less than a tenth of the population could possibly produce a sportsman with more talent and potential than the last nearly-was they coughed up.
Safin-rules-no.1 and Jazar - I would like to know if you hate Murray because he's Scottish or because he's not English? Do you often make judgements on someone's sporting ability based on their nationality?

I hate him because he is a moron :) simple as

MsTree
01-26-2009, 09:07 PM
:spit: back to Scotland for you - LOSER

No you don't. Because if he was English you would be halfway up his arse singing his praises and you wouldn't feel the need to inflict your childish crap on everyone who posts in this forum. You make ruanz look like a sensible well balanced individual. :retard:

Henry Kaspar
01-26-2009, 09:09 PM
Murray got to a GS final. Automatically better than Henman.

Rusedski somewho got to a GS final and was not better than Henman. This said, I expect more from Murray than I ever did from Henman or Rusedski.

Clydey
01-26-2009, 09:16 PM
I think Henman was a good player but as a Brit watching him and rooting for him (desperately so at Wimbledon) I always knew that he would only ever get so far. Semi final's usually, which is nothing to be ashamed of of course but you knew that was it.
With Murray, I always feel that there is a real chance that he will make a big breakthrough at some point and win a slam. I am not saying this just because he is British, I would think this whatever his nationality.
I don't know how much Murray was funded by the LTA but I would imagine that he must have come from quite a wealthy family too, like Henman as the LTA are awful and don't part with their money easily, unless it's paying some big name to advertise and promote a sport which very few people in this country can afford to play right now. They don't spend their money where it is needed imo.

Murray's family are not wealthy. Nothing like the Henman's. He went to Spain and was partly funded by the LTA. I think the Royal Bank of Scotland took a big chance by sponsoring him in his junior days.

guga2120
01-26-2009, 09:28 PM
No, certainly not. Murray is already better than Henman, ever was.

ORGASMATRON
01-26-2009, 09:34 PM
No you don't. Because if he was English you would be halfway up his arse singing his praises and you wouldn't feel the need to inflict your childish crap on everyone who posts in this forum. You make ruanz look like a sensible well balanced individual. :retard:

:lol: Ok i hand it to you that was pretty funny. Cant take you too seriously though, coming from the same country as that guy who lost to Nando in the 4th round of the AO and all.

Andi-M
01-26-2009, 10:16 PM
Yes, at 21 years old its all over for Murray if he has any dignity he should just retire!

kyleskywalker007
01-27-2009, 01:03 AM
both reached 4th ranking, and both failed on the big stage lol

Are you just another troll? For real, the guy should fail on a constant basis in order to be called "another Henman". Give him some time and he might be, but not yet.

Corey Feldman
01-27-2009, 01:11 AM
Muzza reached GS final and is only 21

thread over.

Byrd
01-27-2009, 01:13 AM
Yea he's going to start doing Ariel adverts after all these devasting losses...

lavar78
01-27-2009, 01:20 AM
Rusedski somewho got to a GS final and was not better than Henman. This said, I expect more from Murray than I ever did from Henman or Rusedski.

Exactly. While Murray may surpass Tim's career (and he should), he hasn't yet. Tim made 6 slam semifinals (including 4 at Wimbledon). Right now, Murray's only made 1. Will Murray ever match as miraculous a feat as Henman getting to the French semis?

roberthenman
01-27-2009, 02:16 AM
no, murray is better yçthat henman,, because andy play good in all surfaces

ChatirChatir
01-27-2009, 02:17 AM
Murray sucks

N+H&A

Corey Feldman
01-27-2009, 02:22 AM
ppl forget what a late developer Henman was

by time he reached twenty one, Henman wasnt even in top 100 yet, hadnt won any titles and had only been to 2r of Wimbledon and US open a few times - never even played at RG or AO.

ChatirChatir
01-27-2009, 02:24 AM
thanks for the update buddy

N+H&A

orangehat
01-27-2009, 02:36 AM
Henman was less of an annoying idiot. But anyway, although I think Murray is better than Henman, ultimately I think they will be just the same

swebright
01-27-2009, 02:49 AM
He will definitely win a slam one day. He will be seeded higher too.

(Did Henmen ever reached a slam final???). I don't think so. But he's a gentleman.

Henry Kaspar
01-27-2009, 03:17 AM
Henman was less of an annoying idiot.

I wonder what's the point of such coms.

bizzle
01-27-2009, 03:18 AM
Yes, Andy Murray is just another Tim Henman. If he has any sense he would just retire right now knowing that he will never match the success of the former British #1...

:retard: :retard: :retard: :retard: :retard: :retard: :retard: :retard: :retard:

chris whiteside
01-27-2009, 11:34 AM
Henman was never strong enough mentally to win a Slam.

In some areas Andy has already surpassed Tim and in some he still has a way to go but IMO he has the potential to win a Slam and because of how the courts play at Wimbledon now with the higher bounce I actually believe he has as much chance there as at USO.

But it's far too early to be able to answer this question. If he hasn't made any further progress in 2/3 years time then it's relevant.

vincayou
01-27-2009, 11:47 AM
Well, Murray already made a final. It would be very surprising if he doesn't win a slam soon. Nobody really ever expected Henman to win one, it was more wishful thinking.

tennishero
09-15-2009, 01:19 PM
lol

Jaz
09-15-2009, 01:20 PM
Yes... If he doesn't win a GS in 2010....

ArgieFan
09-15-2009, 01:30 PM
No, he's not. Henman was an enjoyable player to watch, and a classy gentleman in court (most of the times).

Getta
09-15-2009, 01:36 PM
No.

jcempire
09-15-2009, 01:41 PM
Tim Henman---------

who just unluck played in 1990s'? If he played in 2000s'? guess what happened? he may got few Slams.

and too early to call on Murray.

Noleta
09-15-2009, 01:42 PM
No, he's not. Henman was an enjoyable player to watch, and a classy gentleman in court (most of the times).

:yeah:

GlennMirnyi
09-15-2009, 01:43 PM
Don't ever ever ever compare Murray with Henners.

rocketassist
09-15-2009, 01:43 PM
Don't ever ever ever compare Murray with Henners.

If Timmay was in his prime now he'd win a few slams definitely.

Echoes
09-15-2009, 01:54 PM
Rusedski somewho got to a GS final and was not better than Henman.

Agree, tennis is more than only GS. Rusedski just destroyed the game and tested positive.

------

For the rest, I also sometimes compare apples with plums. But I'd rather say it's no use.

tennizen
09-15-2009, 01:54 PM
You wouldn't know class if it bite you in the ass ;)

:hug:

JG you are good:yeah:

Ichiban1920
09-15-2009, 02:55 PM
Henman is a far better player than Mugray will ever be. There is no comparison.

R.Federer
09-15-2009, 03:18 PM
The comparison stops at the teeth.

Goldenoldie
09-15-2009, 04:51 PM
Henman found lots of ways to lose matches he should have won.

Murray finds ways of winning matches he should have lost. Less so recently, which is worrying, but he can still improve.

He will never be another Henman though, because he will never be as popular, no matter what he achieves.

SetSampras
09-15-2009, 04:56 PM
Murray is already better than Henman IMO. Henman was ehhh.....

Ichiban1920
09-15-2009, 05:20 PM
Murray is already better than Henman IMO. Henman was ehhh.....

:lol::haha:

rocketassist
09-15-2009, 05:58 PM
Henman's TMS was a better TMS than any of Murray's...

SetSampras
09-15-2009, 06:12 PM
:lol::haha:

What is so funny? What the hell so great did Henman ever accomplish? By the time Murray's career ends he will be far more success than Freaking Tim Henman ever was. Even it is one slam.. Thats more one more slam than clown Henman won

Stensland
09-15-2009, 06:15 PM
What is so funny? What the hell so great did Henman ever accomplish? By the time Murray's career ends he will be far more success than Freaking Tim Henman ever was. Even it is one slam.. Thats more one more slam than clown Henman won


i'm with you on that but you gotta know that henman is one of mtf's most beloved pets. bashing henman will always backfire.

SetSampras
09-15-2009, 06:33 PM
i'm with you on that but you gotta know that henman is one of mtf's most beloved pets. bashing henman will always backfire.

Why? :)

Im sorry but Murray is already well on his way to eclipsing Henman's career and Murray has only been significant for a year now. Im sure Murray will have 1-2 slams AT LEAST. He will finally grab one and Im sure grab a ton more masters events since he is the king of 3 sets and will eventually get over that slam hump even if its only for one slam or two.

i dont expect Murray to be an all time great,but probably the best British player. If thats much of an accomplishment. LOL

tennishero
01-31-2010, 10:31 AM
Murray still yet to win a slam lol

freeandlonely
01-31-2010, 10:45 AM
Better than Henman.

Persimmon
01-31-2010, 12:08 PM
Probably.

Mateya
01-31-2010, 01:11 PM
NO.
Muzza is a totaly different type of player and he has almost 10 years of career left. He'll win a slam sooner or later, but even if he doesn't, he'll still achieve more and have better career than Henman.
:wavey:

andylovesaustin
01-31-2010, 01:16 PM
Why would he be? Muzza's already achieved more than Henman and Haas put together in their whole careers.

Why is this stupidest thread allowed in this forum? This is a hating thread with the only purpose of stuffing our hearts with ill feelings until they explode :sad: Mods, please obliterate this evil thread from the face of Earth or at least move it to the challenger forums, thank you.

That's what I thought. :shrug:

Stefanos13
01-31-2010, 01:20 PM
This question exposes how weak tennis has been in GBR! Henman was only top10 material in spite of some number 4 position. He never stood a chance for a slam and other than campaigning for serve-and-volley he was always match vulnerable.

Murray has already achieved more if you measure success by grand slam performance – 2 grand slam finals. He's unquestionably "number 1" material and if he doesn't win a slam in the next few years it'll be a real shock to those who understand tennis

oranges
01-31-2010, 01:43 PM
No, I liked Henman, both his game and personally

Noleta
01-31-2010, 02:05 PM
Murray already won more at the age of 22,than Henman.

Henman is nothing like Murray,he have an endearing peronality on and off court,and his game was beautiful to watch,so i can't see the resemblance at all.

Xenosys
01-31-2010, 02:12 PM
The numbers for all you statisticians out there would say no, but psychologically, it remains to be seen whether Andy can step up future and fulfill the potential and win a couple of big ones. He's already eclipsed Henman's GS record as 2 Finals > 6 SF's imo.

His all-round game is much better than Henman's, a serve-volley specialist, which makes him a contender in at least 60%-70% of the tournaments he enters, as they are on HC's. Henman's was very much suited to 1990s-2003 grass.

So physically, most definetly no. Mentally he seems tougher than Henman on-court and wins a lot of matches he should win, but he needs to take that next big step. Thankfully, he's got time on his side.

Allez
01-31-2010, 05:13 PM
Hell no. The stats speak for themselves. He has already achieved @ 22 more than Tim had in his entire career. Love Tim but Murray is a class above him.

abraxas21
01-31-2010, 05:18 PM
no. henmann was an overrated bloke who wasn't able to do much with class except serve and volley.

murray is an overly defensive pusher but at least he has more variety in his game. plus, he's already achieved much more than henmann at the age of 22.

Tim Henry Murray
01-31-2010, 05:22 PM
Yes.

prafull
01-31-2010, 06:03 PM
No, Henman was far better.

Midnight Ninja
01-31-2010, 07:40 PM
The comparison isn't fair to either player. It's stupid to compare them just based on the fact that they are from the UK. Yes Henman wasn't ever able to win a slam just like Murray hasn't UPTIL now. Murray is still playing and even if he doesn't win one right now, he could potentially still win one in the next 2-3 years if not more.

Off-topic but relevant: Right after todays final, the trending topic on Twitter in London/UK was Henman :lol:

tennishero
07-02-2010, 05:43 PM
obligatory bump :devil:

Surcouf
07-02-2010, 05:48 PM
Murray has still a lot of time to do better.

rubbERR
07-02-2010, 05:50 PM
before this year top level was stable but now there is birdshit and söderling grandslam finals and even cilic was close :lol:

AndyUK
07-02-2010, 05:51 PM
He has already achieved more than Henman by getting to two Grand Slam finals but by another Tim Henman, I assume you mean one of our players that is very good but just falls short at the last hurdle and is never able to win a Grand Slam.

In answer to that, it is hard to tell but I don't think he will be. I do think he'll win a hard court slam eventually, the only guy that has stopped him from doing that is Federer and he is on the decline but I'm not sure about him winning Wimbledon.

tennishero
07-02-2010, 05:52 PM
He has already achieved more than Henman by getting to two Grand Slam finals but by another Tim Henman, I assume you mean one of our players that is very good but just falls short at the last hurdle and is never able to win a Grand Slam.

In answer to that, it is hard to tell but I don't think he will be. I do think he'll win a hard court slam eventually, the only guy that has stopped him from doing that is Federer and he is on the decline but I'm not sure about him winning Wimbledon.

good reply, i agree although it's hard to see how murray will win a slam when there are a lot of players that can blow him off the court.

kooties
07-02-2010, 05:52 PM
Murray is Mecir not Henman.

Grand Slam best results:

Murray: AO finalist, RG quarterfinalist , Wimbly Semi-Finalist, USO Finalist
Mecir: AO finalist, RG Semi-finalist , Wimbly Semi-Finalist, USO Finalist

FFS get it right people :o

Ben.
07-02-2010, 05:54 PM
No, he is clearly not. He was very unlucky that Federer decided to turn up in vintage 2004-07 form at the Aussie Open this year, but even so, on paper he wasn't supposed to win either final or his semi today, though he was expected to beat Roddick last year, that was the only time I felt he really squandered an opportunity, but Roddick was too good on the day. With a bit of luck he could easily pick up a slam, if someone else knocks out Rafa or Fed and the draw opens up. Even if that doesn't happen he can still win a slam. Come August he is one of the favourites for the US, maybe even the favourite with Rafa usually not in top form come that time of year and it being his worst surface, Federer and Djokovic out of form and Del Potro absent.

jenanun
07-02-2010, 05:56 PM
no... although murray may never win wimbledon, I can definitely see him winning slam on HC, most likely USO....

Sunset of Age
07-02-2010, 06:10 PM
Murray still has a lot of time on his side, and he's already made it to two GS finals, this during the Fedal era :worship:. I expect him to take a slam at some time during his career, something Henman never even came close to doing.

River
07-02-2010, 06:13 PM
Murray has time on his side. It's the pressure he carries in England that hurts him. He's also like the other Andy in that the one always standing in his way is a man named Roger Federer.

Billups85
07-02-2010, 06:22 PM
Murray >>>>>>> Henman.

Polikarpov
07-02-2010, 06:24 PM
Murray definitely has better teeth.

Allegretto
07-02-2010, 06:25 PM
No.

He doesn't have the class.

Billups85
07-02-2010, 07:01 PM
Henman is a far better player than Mugray will ever be. There is no comparison.

Murray has surpassed Henman clearly. Highest ranking, more titles overall, more important titles (4 vs 1 Masters Series), 2 vs 0 Grand Slams finals ... and Andy is 23!!. This is just ridiculous.

Tom_Bombadil
07-02-2010, 07:18 PM
Short answer: NO.

I think he's number four in the world and we'll be soon number three. I can't remember if Henman achieved any Grand Slam final but I don't think so, while he's already reached 2 and is only 23 if i'm not mistaken.

He'll win a Grand Slam sooner or later, I'm sure of that.

Persimmon
07-03-2010, 12:29 AM
Nah. He will win a couple of HC slams.

General Suburbia
07-03-2010, 12:35 AM
Even if he never wins a slam (doubtful) his achievements so far have already vastly overshadowed henman's. Henman never even got to a GS final.

coonster14
07-03-2010, 02:27 AM
murray is way better than henman. murray's been ranked #2, i believe he will win at least one major in his career.

syc23
07-03-2010, 09:53 AM
Once Federer declines (soon), Rafa's knee explodes (within the next 18 months), Soderling/Berdych starts getting beat because of their inability to sustain their current form and hit a bad patch it will happen. Wasn't that long ago people were dismissing Fedal of picking up another slam.

And no Murray is not another Henman.

freeandlonely
07-03-2010, 02:57 PM
He is more complete than Henman, and overall better than Henman.

fran70
07-03-2010, 04:33 PM
Murray still has a lot of time on his side, and he's already made it to two GS finals, this during the Fedal era :worship:. I expect him to take a slam at some time during his career, something Henman never even came close to doing.

I agree with you. I don`t know if he will that on Wimbledon but he will win at least one GS. Unless Murray achieved better results he has to learn a lot of Henman (:worship:) about how to be a gentleman and nice person and not to fail on the attemp.

Sunset of Age
07-04-2010, 12:57 AM
I agree with you. I don`t know if he will that on Wimbledon but he will win at least one GS. Unless Murray achieved better results he has to learn a lot of Henman (:worship:) about how to be a gentleman and nice person and not to fail on the attemp.

Well said on the whole, but I do think that Muzza, however much as he comes across as 'negative and sulky' to some, is indeed a nice British Gentleman himself as much as Henman was. Muzza is not the 'perfect picture', but I do think he carries himself across as classy as can be, most of all in his dreadful loss at the AO this year. His tears were endearing to me. :)