Mathieu on Djokovic [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Mathieu on Djokovic

xargon
06-02-2008, 04:51 AM
Even though he says clay is not his favorite surface, I think his game is perfectly suited to it. I think he can win the tournament.

- Paul-Henri Mathieu on Novak Djokovic's chances at the French Open

JimmyV
06-02-2008, 05:26 AM
http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/c/c2/Not-again-picard2.jpg

Action Jackson
06-02-2008, 05:38 AM
He can turn wine into water.

finishingmove
06-02-2008, 09:28 AM
He can turn wine into water.

gold into break points

dark_ambient
06-02-2008, 10:26 AM
Bread(sticks) into bagel(s). :angel:

TheSwissMaster
06-02-2008, 10:31 AM
now that Paul-Henri Mathieu has said it, i'll have to revise my predictions for the RG winner:lol:

FedererSlam
06-02-2008, 11:32 AM
PHM you lost cause your a headcase. Djoko wasn't doing any Jesus out there - no way either of you can take more than 1 set of Nadal...maybe 2 at a push if you play the best you have ever done.

Burrow
06-02-2008, 01:14 PM
I think he knows more than you guys, he is the pro player. :tape:

Emmaloo
06-02-2008, 01:22 PM
Yep because no tennis player has ever spoken out of their asses. That's just crazy talk.

Beforehand
06-02-2008, 01:51 PM
Mathieu's given Nadal arguably the toughest match of his RG career, so maybe that contributes to him thinking that Nadal is somehow manageable, while Djokovic is not.

That's the closest I can come to making any sense of this particular statement.

Okonsky
06-02-2008, 01:52 PM
Sampras knows nothing, Paolo knows nothing, Murray sucks, Amagro is mug, Verdasko si full of BS, Blake is overrated, etc...lucky for us we have the most precious tennis experts here. I wonder how the Earth they haven't good payed job as experts.

Roland9
06-02-2008, 02:00 PM
Sampras knows nothing, Paolo knows nothing, Murray sucks, Amagro is mug, Verdasko si full of BS, Blake is overrated, etc...lucky for us we have the most precious tennis experts here. I wonder how the Earth they haven't good payed job as experts.

Not just tennis experts. They know everything; be it tennis, injury, sickness, mentality, psychology, ethics, virtues... MTF is Übermensch.

Okonsky
06-02-2008, 02:24 PM
MTF is Übermensch.

It is.

arm
06-02-2008, 02:26 PM
Sampras knows nothing, Paolo knows nothing, Murray sucks, Amagro is mug, Verdasko si full of BS, Blake is overrated, etc...lucky for us we have the most precious tennis experts here. I wonder how the Earth they haven't good payed job as experts.

Because they didn't want to! If they actually did, they would have becomed the goatS (plural).

Not just tennis experts. They know everything; be it tennis, injury, sickness, mentality, psychology, ethics, virtues... MTF is Übermensch.

Yeah right. :yeah:

Henry Chinaski
06-02-2008, 02:32 PM
He was probably asked if he thought Djok had a chance of winning the tournament. And he was hardly going to say the guy who just trounced him in straights had a snowball in hell's chance now was he?

Mateya
06-02-2008, 02:38 PM
If Rafzilla wasn't around, Djoker would win this, I'm sure. :)

Useless thread.

Bazooka
06-02-2008, 03:25 PM
Really anyone here thinks he CAN'T win the tournament? because he said he can win, not that he's favorite or anything. There are 128 players that can win.

Forehander
06-02-2008, 05:18 PM
He does have the game to win it but it's all about consistency.

Lee
06-02-2008, 06:19 PM
Really anyone here thinks he CAN'T win the tournament? because he said he can win, not that he's favorite or anything. There are 128 players that can win.

I think RIGHT NOW, it's down to about 10 players that can win. ;)

JimmyV
06-02-2008, 06:26 PM
http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/4150/walkdoor6yq7.gif

star
06-02-2008, 06:31 PM
Q. Pensez-vous que Djokovic peut gagner ce tournoi ?

R. Oui, je pense qu'il peut gagner le tournoi.

Q. Il faut quoi contre Nadal, par exemple ?

R. Il l'a déjà battu, même si lui dit que la terre battue n'est pas sa meilleure surface, son jeu s'adapte très bien sur cette surface. Après, la seule question est de savoir s'il va tenir pendant 3, 4 ou 5 sets contre Nadal. Mais il a largement les armes pour le battre ici.