Darren Cahill as a commentator: YAY or NAY? [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Darren Cahill as a commentator: YAY or NAY?

gillian
01-27-2008, 03:13 PM
I vote YAY. Cahill is about to surpass John McEnroe as my favorite tennis commentator. He's well-informed but not overbearing. His comments don't intrude during the points and he's a nice counterbalance to Chris Fowler.

Lee
01-27-2008, 03:15 PM
Yay for me too. He's the best so far.

thrust
01-27-2008, 03:36 PM
Yay!!

Burrow
01-27-2008, 04:55 PM
No idea, never heard him commentate for any length of time, but I like him.

My favourite is Peter Fleming.

savesthedizzle
01-27-2008, 05:02 PM
Yay for me. By far my favorite out of the ESPN crew.

sports freak
01-27-2008, 05:03 PM
Wayne Arthurs!!

Kitty de Sade
01-27-2008, 05:04 PM
100% YAY. Killer is awesome. :yeah:

mariyella80
01-27-2008, 05:13 PM
YAY.... we NEED him to put flower and patrick in check when they exaggerate comments to american player's benefit......STICK AROUND KILLER, GOOD ON YA!!

Scotso
01-27-2008, 06:58 PM
I think he's somewhat boring, but he's still sexy.

Winston's Human
01-27-2008, 07:19 PM
Cahill is the best commentator on ESPN.

Modetopia
01-27-2008, 07:41 PM
he was so right.:D

Djokovic needs to maintain mental toughness versus Tsonga
By Darren Cahill
ESPN

Two weeks ago, not many experts would have predicted Novak Djokovic to be in the Australian Open final -- not with Roger Federer in his half of the draw -- and only a prescient few had unseeded and unproven Jo-Wilfried Tsonga emerging from the other section.

But, these two stars have played immaculate tennis, and one is a win from his first career Grand Slam title.

It's imperative Tsonga serve effectively, as he has done impressively en route to the final. He has shown all-around peerless tennis, which has only been amplified by his ability to hold serve efficiently, subsequently alleviating unneeded pressure.

Tsonga unloaded versus Rafael Nadal in the semifinals. He hit huge serves -- upward of 135 mph -- and judiciously kept his opponent off balance with a good array of drop shots. We're entering the unknown for this first-time finalist. He has the potential, but only now are we able to enjoy his talents.

The question with Tsonga is whether he can go five sets if it comes down to that, considering it would be uncharted territory. We have seen spectacular tennis from a Frenchman many of us never paid attention to before he knocked off the No. 2 player in the world, Nadal.

Will we see the French flair, again, from Tsonga? The manner in which he has manhandled his opponents throughout this tournament has been impressive, if not shocking. For the first time, though, he enters a match with expectations. How he holds up under pressure is going to be key in this matchup. The difference is that against Nadal, very few expected Tsonga to win, never mind blow the Spaniard off the court. He had nothing to lose.

At 22 years old, Tsonga enters the match as a slight underdog to his 20-year-old counterpart. He's been derailed by injuries -- a herniated disc and later shoulder injuries. In the tennis world, he's a late bloomer.

Novak Djokovic, in his second Grand Slam final, will take on unheralded and unseeded Jo-Wilfried Tsonga.
Tsonga has done an incredible job of getting back in shape. He's one of the fittest players on tour now. Strength and conditioning is as important in this game today as it ever has been. The Frenchman was able to run down a lot of balls in the semifinals. He'll need to be just as quick in the final.

Djokovic, for the first time, is going to be favored in a high-profile match. He will need to control his nerves. His vulnerability in the third set versus David Ferrer in the quarterfinals was evident. He pulled through, but questions were raised.

Djokovic responded in the semifinals against Federer. He looked like a completely different player from the one we saw at the U.S. Open final just a few months earlier. He wasn't ready to handle the pressure of that situation, and it showed as he lost in straight sets. The Djokovic we're observing at the Australian Open has grown a lot.

He remained calm after going down an early break in the first set in his last match versus the world's top player. His comeback set the tone for the rest of the encounter. It spoke volumes about the maturation of Djokovic. We often forget how young he is. The Serb seems to have been around forever. If he can prove his mental game is consistently strong in high-tension situations, he is going to be a difficult force to overcome.

Djokovic, just as he did midway though the first set in disposing Federer, needs to flatten out his groundstrokes and disallow Tsonga time to get back in the point. Djokovic effectively held his ground on the baseline and was able to dictate play against Federer. Unlike Nadal, whose baseline game features heavy spin -- forceful on clay, but clearly neutralized on the new hard courts Down Under -- Djokovic can aggressively hit through the ball. If he doesn't, Tsonga will have time to retrieve and become the aggressor.

Djokovic also needs to maintain a high percentage of first serves to secure easy points. Tsonga has a skilled return and will press his opponent on second serves. If the third-seeded Serb is on the defensive, Tsonga will attack the net -- and he has a dynamite volley.

Experience is a key ingredient for Djokovic; he's been in a Slam final before. The way he handled Federer, and the toughness he showed, was a revelation. If he can avoid a letdown, Djokovic should win this final in four sets. But Tsonga is not a flash in the pan. He will jump on Djokovic if he doesn't employ and maintain aggressive tennis.

Darren Cahill, the former coach of Lleyton Hewitt and Andre Agassi, is providing Australian Open analysis for ESPN.

Kolya
01-28-2008, 12:33 AM
He is good.

Beforehand
01-28-2008, 12:35 AM
I love Cahill, but I think I don't understand disliking Fowler. Maybe I've given him the benefit of the doubt, but I think he's done a fine job of learning, considering he was just kind of heaved into being the ESPN guy there, wasn't he?

MissMelly2U
01-28-2008, 01:04 AM
I love Cahill, but I think I don't understand disliking Fowler. Maybe I've given him the benefit of the doubt, but I think he's done a fine job of learning, considering he was just kind of heaved into being the ESPN guy there, wasn't he?

I think Chris Fowler has gotten much better. You can tell that he truly loves the sport and sometimes he points out things from a fan perspective versus a coach's perspective like other commentators.

Darren Cahill is a gem. He usually always has something insightful to add to the commentary.

Beforehand
01-28-2008, 01:06 AM
Yeah, I mean, when I think Chris Fowler, I think college football. THat's just who he is. I think he's done great, and seldom does he say anything completely off-base and irrelevant. Every now and then he will, but it's clear that it's because he doesn't have experience or it isn't his best field more than because he's an idiot.

cmurray
01-28-2008, 01:28 AM
cahill is a really good commentator. He has good insight, he doesn't talk too much and his voice isn't annoying. What more can you ask for? :hug: Besides that, he came out of Camp Agassi...how can I NOT like him????:p

Mechlan
01-28-2008, 01:31 AM
Cahill is great. As cmurray said, what's not to like?

Fowler has come a long way. I think the absence of Gilbert has done a world of good to his tennis-loving side.

Bibberz
01-28-2008, 01:42 AM
Killer's awesome. I daresay he's my second favorite Aussie of all time--just ahead of Guy Pearce, but just behind Michael Hutchence.

RogerFan82
01-28-2008, 01:53 AM
Cahill rocks !!!! I hope Roger asks Cahill to be his coach. It would be a great combo. :D:D

Allure
01-28-2008, 01:57 AM
Good commentator. Not annoying. Easy on the eyes. Yay from me.

Bibberz
01-28-2008, 01:59 AM
I pray Roger doesn't wrest Killer away from us. I do agree that Roger needs a coach, though.

Cahill rocks !!!! I hope Roger asks Cahill to be his coach. It would be a great combo. :D:D

Beforehand
01-28-2008, 02:06 AM
I've been hoping for Roger to ask Cahill to coach for a bit.

It'd be worth losing him as a commentator to have him as Roger's coach.

RogerFan82
01-28-2008, 02:12 AM
I've been hoping for Roger to ask Cahill to coach for a bit.

It'd be worth losing him as a commentator to have him as Roger's coach.

I certainly won't mind losing cahill as a commentator, if Roger can snag him as a coach!!!;);)

I'm sure many fed fans would feel the same!!!:)

Bibberz
01-28-2008, 02:14 AM
Roger definitely should get a coach before the FO. I think he needs to make winning the FO top priority. I'm not sure Killer's the man for that job.

I've been hoping for Roger to ask Cahill to coach for a bit.

It'd be worth losing him as a commentator to have him as Roger's coach.

njnetswill
01-28-2008, 05:04 AM
Cahill is awesome.

I don't mind Fowler either, although he is very eager to dismiss "nobodies" and "journeymen".

Jlee
01-28-2008, 05:08 AM
I like Fowler and Cahill. I went up to Cahill after he was helping Hewitt out with practice at Cincy last summer and asked for his autograph...I was the only one :lol:. He smiled and agreed...

gillian
01-28-2008, 02:11 PM
No doubt, Fowler has improved and really seems to enjoy covering tennis. That's cool to see.

Commander Data
01-28-2008, 02:32 PM
No, cause I want Cahill as Federer coach!