Ever seen anyone get f****d up so much by hawkeye...? [Archive] - MensTennisForums.com

Ever seen anyone get f****d up so much by hawkeye...?

Rogiman
09-09-2007, 10:56 PM
:rolls:

RagingLamb
09-09-2007, 10:57 PM
yeah Wimbledon 2007 final.

Fed almost lost the match because of how wrong it was all the time.

JustJames
09-09-2007, 10:59 PM
Has Nole just been unlucky, or do you think that Hawk-eye is getting it wrong?

Rogiman
09-09-2007, 11:00 PM
Has Nole just been unlucky, or do you think that Hawk-eye is getting it wrong?No idea, it's just hillarios how it all goes against him...

JustJames
09-09-2007, 11:04 PM
No idea, it's just hillarios how it all goes against him...

:lol:

Yep! It seems like every game Nole loses a crucial point on a Hawk-eye challenge..

nkhera1
09-09-2007, 11:05 PM
Thank god he isn't crying about it though.

Cat123
09-09-2007, 11:06 PM
Man, the amount of bad luck Nole is getting is almost comical. Or it would be if it wasn't so upsetting! you've gotta respect Fed for that ace!!!!

dragons112
09-09-2007, 11:07 PM
No the hawk eye is not rong dont make excuses for ihm being beaten on break points.

Roger survived at this years wimby final - dont have double standards

dragons112
09-09-2007, 11:07 PM
So its all luck you say?

Its not the fact he kept the ball in play during long rallies, hit aces, came to net, slowed the play down about 9 times.

OH so its not that its just "sheer" luck

How or what is luck tell me how roger did not earn those points. HE simply beat novak on the points.

Novak was never in position to take the points he did not have open courts an dmissed the shots like roger did when he was broken - it doesnt matter roger will win.

Roger is not even at his best - anyone who watches tennis would know that. He normally hits around 50 winners per match atm hes below thirty.

Go Roger
__________________


Roger Federer - The Best Is Still too Come

JustJames
09-09-2007, 11:09 PM
No the hawk eye is not rong dont make excuses for ihm being beaten on break points.

Roger survived at this years wimby final - dont have double standards

Who are you talking too? :retard:

Only one poster has suggested that it might be "rong".. otherwise we are simply laughing at how close but wrong all of Noles calls have been [and vice-versa for Fed]

Rogiman
09-09-2007, 11:11 PM
So its all luck you say?

Its not the fact he kept the ball in play during long rallies, hit aces, came to net, slowed the play down about 9 times.

OH so its not that its just "sheer" luck

How or what is luck tell me how roger did not earn those points. HE simply beat novak on the points.

Novak was never in position to take the points he did not have open courts an dmissed the shots like roger did when he was broken - it doesnt matter roger will win.

Roger is not even at his best - anyone who watches tennis would know that. He normally hits around 50 winners per match atm hes below thirty.

Go Roger
__________________


Roger Federer - The Best Is Still too ComeHere's some geometry for you:

:retard::retard::retard::retard:
:retard::retard::retard:
:retard::retard:
:retard:

dragons112
09-09-2007, 11:11 PM
im talking to that one post and any future posts in regards to that

JustJames
09-09-2007, 11:12 PM
im talking to that one post and any future posts in regards to that

:yawn:

Stop trying to stir things up... Lighten up :)

R.Federer
09-09-2007, 11:21 PM
Win some,lose some. Federer took it royally on grass. He even said Sh**!

dijus
09-09-2007, 11:29 PM
I think Federer's always lucky.

natasha_nana
09-10-2007, 12:12 AM
yeah Wimbledon 2007 final.



:yeah:

he may have won it in the end...but it wasnt pretty with roger and hawkeye...

I still dont know what to think of it...it's accuracy is in millimetres..and a lot of these calls have been in or out by only THAT millimetre. :rolleyes:

Greenday
09-10-2007, 12:17 AM
I think Federer's always lucky.

Spot on..otherwise he should have easily lost to jenkins in the first round..something like 6-1 6-0 6-0

Alex999
09-10-2007, 12:37 AM
I don't believe in luck. Nole had his chances. 7 fucking set points he wasn't able to convert. Bad nerves at crucial moments. I still love this young man and believe he will win many slams. Congrats to Fed.

ReturnWinner
09-10-2007, 12:39 AM
Fakevic should not whine about that too much , remember his match against Cañas?? Cañas had a bp then Fakevic hit a ball wide but it touched the ball about 5% lol, against Hewitt in the fourth set happened some similar but the ball was in a little more

Alex999
09-10-2007, 01:30 AM
RW

I'd really appreciate if you drop "Fakevic". It is boring me to death. Fucking retard.

WF4EVER
09-10-2007, 01:47 AM
I don't believe in luck. Nole had his chances. 7 fucking set points he wasn't able to convert. Bad nerves at crucial moments. I still love this young man and believe he will win many slams. Congrats to Fed.

Well, it happens to the best of them. In the Montreal final Roger was also up 6-5 and 40-0 and got broken and lost the tie-breaker, too.

Nole's time will come, I'm sure. He's a very good player.

World Beater
09-10-2007, 03:26 AM
Roddick had a hard time at the AO with federer's challenges. Everything went against roddick.

Allure
09-10-2007, 03:29 AM
Fed is also blessed with super human eye sight.