- View Single Post - Who will be considered as a better player: Davydenko vs Nalbandian?
View Single Post
post #57 of (permalink) Old 10-18-2009, 01:27 PM
country flag selyoink
Registered User
selyoink's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 32
Posts: 5,659
Re: Who will be considered as a better player: Davydenko vs Nalbandian

Originally Posted by Sophocles View Post
Nalbandian has the better slam record & has won a bigger title (Masters Cup). Davydenko has more titles & a more consistent ranking history. The original question is who will be remembered as the better player. People remember slams & big titles more than small titles and rankings, so the answer must be Nalbandian.
Yes and neither has a slam and no one will remember Hewitt ripping Nalby to pieces in Wimbledon final. Davy has three Masters Titles and a final in Masters Cup to Nalby two Masters Titles and Masters Cup victory. The idea that Nalby has won more big totals is a total fiction.

So is the idea that Davy can't beat the top players. He can't beat Federer. And Blake but he is not a top player.

Originally Posted by Clay Death
i add value to mtf. mtf needs me far more than i need mtf. i have even been offered money (a small monthy salary) to hang out and chill at a couple of other forums.
selyoink is offline  
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome