Hilde has lots of questions.
Since when is one "dead fly dumping" question "lots of questions"?
The Lance Armstrong saga. On Flemish tv, we have a commentator called Wuyts who approaches tv commenting from the fanboy viewpoint. Lance was one of his favorite cyclists to drool over. I can't stand him (esp. his Tommeke Boonen drooling is embarrassing for somebody who gets paid to comment on tv. When Tom Boonen approaches the finishing line with a good chance to win: Tom...TOM...GO ON, TOM.....TOMMEKE!!!!!!!...Oooooooooooh, Tommeke *breathing heavily*).
On Dutch tv, there is Mart Smeets. I can enjoy listening to Smeets. However, other cyclists suspected of doping would be dumped like dead flies in a heart-beat by Smeets but he kept drooling over Armstrong, defending him (he used to follow him around in the TdF and he wrote a book about him).
It's fun to see Wuyts and Smeets, two big "Lance is innocent" defenders, squirm today. Smeets will be on Dutch tv to talk about it this evening. I'll try to catch that.
I wouldn't even mind their defence if they hadn't been so quick and cruel in dumping other cyclists like dead flies.