TT Changes 2013 - Page 5 - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #61 of 65 (permalink) Old 12-02-2012, 04:41 AM
Registered User
 
buji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Age: 27
Posts: 2,706
                     
Re: TT Changes 2013

COMMITMENTS

1) Should players be allowed to play in two places at the same time (the final of a week X event AND the qualifying of a week x+1 event)?
YES

2) Should players who lose in a Grand Slam qualifying be allowed to play a challenger in the following week?[/FONT] YES

3) GS/IW/Miami week 2 events:[/FONT]
GS R16 - out of qualifying; GS QF - out of MD? (current rule)
Players should be able to commit to the 2nd week challengers only after they're out of the GSs/IW/Miami

4) Late entries & SE's:

No restrictions? (current rule)
Players who commit as late entries shouldn't be eligible to receive a SE

5) Doubles commitments:

Both players in a partnership should commit/confirm before being accepted in the doubles list

6) Singles commitments by another person?
NO


DRAWS[/FONT]

7) Late entries & seedings

No restrictions? (current rule)
Late entries shouldn't be seeded

8) Should there be a restriction to avoid singles R1 matches between doubles partners?
NO


SENDING PICKS[/FONT]

9) Should picks which were sent to the person who posted the OOP be accepted?

NO

10) Should picks sent by e-mail be accepted?
YES ONLY IF THE BOARD IS DOWN!

11) Should there be a punishment for players who don't send picks?

NO!


OOP[/FONT]

12) Standard minimum of TT matches in first rounds (4, 5, 6, 7, no restrictions?)
It should at least be more than 6.

13) Standardizing the OOP:[/FONT]
No - Manager's choice


TB System[/FONT]

14) TB method: The number of sets given to the winner when the player picks the loser (2-1, 3-2 & 3-1 losing picks) should be a tie-breaker before the SR shootout.

YES

15) SR Shootout: Picking the correct winner or SR of a lower SR should have priority over giving a set to the winner when both players pick the loser in a higher SR?
NO

16) PTS:[/FONT]
Correct order of sets should always beat correct scorelines


RANKING POINTS


17) Qualifying points: There should be points for qualifying wins.

BIG YESSS

18) There should be a Team Race for the World Tour Finals.

YES


OTHERS


19) Retirements should count for SR and shootout purposes (64 40 ret -> 64 60 win; 46 23 ret -> 46 63 60 win)?
NO

20) Challenger choices: ranking points/entry list quality or diversity of continents/timezones?
TIME ZONES

21) Possible exception: Accepting picks 1/2/3/4/5 minutes after the deadline?
NOOOO

Be so happy that when others look at you , they become happy too
buji is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 65 (permalink) Old 12-02-2012, 04:47 PM
Registered User
 
Rodrigo R3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Goiânia, Goiás, Brasil
Posts: 713
                     
Re: TT Changes 2013

COMMITMENTS

1) Should players be allowed to play in two places at the same time (the final of a week X event AND the qualifying of a week x+1 event)?

Yes/No? (Current rule: yes)

2) Should players who lose in a Grand Slam qualifying be allowed to play a challenger in the following week?

Yes/No/No if qualifying points are introduced? (Current rule: Yes)

3) GS/IW/Miami week 2 events:

GS R16 - out of qualifying; GS QF - out of MD? (current rule)
Players who're still alive in the GS (or IW/Miami) by Saturday (GS R16) should be out of the 2nd week challengers, MD or qualifying? Yes
Players should be able to commit to the 2nd week challengers only after they're out of the GSs/IW/Miami? No

4) Late entries & SE's:

No restrictions? (current rule)
Players who commit as late entries 48 hours or less before the final deadline shouldn't be eligible to receive a SE?
Players who commit as late entries shouldn't be eligible to receive a SE?

5) Doubles commitments:

It should be enough if only a player commits the doubles team? (current rule)
Both players in a partnership should commit/confirm before being accepted in the doubles list?

6) Singles commitments by another person?

Yes/No (Current rule: yes)


DRAWS


7) Late entries & seedings

No restrictions? (current rule)
Late entries shouldn't be seeded?

8) Should there be a restriction to avoid singles R1 matches between doubles partners?

Yes/No (Current rule: no)


SENDING PICKS


9) Should picks which were sent to the person who posted the OOP be accepted?

Yes/No (Current rule: no)

10) Should picks sent by e-mail be accepted?

Yes/No/Facebook? (Current rule: yes)

11) Should there be a punishment for players who don't send picks?

Yes/No (Current rule: no)


OOP


12) Standard minimum of TT matches in first rounds (4, 5, 6, 7, no restrictions?)


13) Standardizing the OOP:

No - Manager's choice (Current rule)
Yes - The order should be decided by the number of differences of each match: more diffs -> higher in the SR order?
Yes - The order should be decided by the order of the matches in the official OOP: left to right or top to bottom?


TB System


14) TB method: The number of sets given to the winner when the player picks the loser (2-1, 3-2 & 3-1 losing picks) should be a tie-breaker before the SR shootout.

Yes/No (Curret rule: no)

15) SR Shootout: Picking the correct winner or SR of a lower SR should have priority over giving a set to the winner when both players pick the loser in a higher SR?

Yes/No (Current rule: no)

16) PTS:

Correct order of sets should always beat correct scorelines? No
GD should be used as the PTS system?


RANKING POINTS


17) Qualifying points: There should be points for qualifying wins.

Yes/No (Current rule: no)

18) There should be a Team Race for the World Tour Finals.

Yes/No (Current rule: no)


OTHERS


19) Retirements should count for SR and shootout purposes (64 40 ret -> 64 60 win; 46 23 ret -> 46 63 60 win)?
No

20) Challenger choices: ranking points/entry list quality or diversity of continents/timezones?


21) Possible exception: Accepting picks 1/2/3/4/5 minutes after the deadline?
No. The deadline is the deadline.

Titles
Singles - 2011 - Charlotsville CH / 2013 - 250 Montpellier / 2014 - GS Australian Open, 500 Valencia / 2015 - GS Roland Garros, 500 Rotterdam, 500 Hamburgo, 250 Bogotá / 2016 - 250 Auckland / 250 Montpellier
Doubles - 2011 - CH Recife, Manerbio, Ortisei w/LucasBH / 2012 - 250 - Halle, Viña del Mar, Belgrade, CH - Dallas,w/LucasBH / 2013 - 250 Montpellier w/Elmo Jr / 2014 - 500 Dubai, 250 Memphis, Burnie CH w/ Elmo Jr / 2015 - Bucaramanga CH, 250 Kuala Lumpur, 500 Rio w/ Elmo, 250 Bogotá, w/dinkulpus / 2016 - ATP World Finals, Rio Olympic Games, St. Brieuc CH, w/Elmo
Rankings
Singles - 75 (best - 1)
Doubles - 4 (best - 1)
Rodrigo R3 is offline  
post #63 of 65 (permalink) Old 12-02-2012, 06:27 PM
Registered User
 
FiBeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CapFed, Bs. As.
Posts: 29,033
                     
Re: TT Changes 2013

1) Should players be allowed to play in two places at the same time (the final of a week X event AND the qualifying of a week x+1 event)?
Yes

2) Should players who lose in a Grand Slam qualifying be allowed to play a challenger in the following week?
Yes

3) GS/IW/Miami week 2 events:
GS R16 - out of qualifying; GS QF - out of MD? (current rule)

4) Late entries & SE's:
No restrictions? (current rule)


5) Doubles commitments:
It should be enough if only a player commits the doubles team? (current rule)


6) Singles commitments by another person?
Yes


DRAWS

7) Late entries & seedings
No restrictions

8) Should there be a restriction to avoid singles R1 matches between doubles partners?
No

SENDING PICKS

9) Should picks which were sent to the person who posted the OOP be accepted?
Yes

10) Should picks sent by e-mail be accepted?
Yes

11) Should there be a punishment for players who don't send picks?
No


OOP

12) Standard minimum of TT matches in first rounds
no restrictions

13) Standardizing the OOP:
No - Manager's choice (Current rule)



TB System

14) TB method: The number of sets given to the winner when the player picks the loser (2-1, 3-2 & 3-1 losing picks) should be a tie-breaker before the SR shootout.
No

15) SR Shootout: Picking the correct winner or SR of a lower SR should have priority over giving a set to the winner when both players pick the loser in a higher SR?
No

16) PTS:
Correct order of sets should always beat correct scorelines?
No



RANKING POINTS

17) Qualifying points: There should be points for qualifying wins.
Yes

18) There should be a Team Race for the World Tour Finals.
Yes


OTHERS

19) Retirements should count for SR and shootout purposes
YES


20) Challenger choices: ranking points/entry list quality or diversity of continents/timezones?
Ranking points & entry list quality

21) Possible exception: Accepting picks 1/2/3/4/5 minutes after the deadline?
No imposed time (e.g. play starts at 12.. manager accepting until 11am. Picks accepted until 12.05 in cases where there are no livestreams and after warm-up finishes/first point is played when stream

Entrá a http://batennis.com/

Sorewa ore no Nindou da

6-4 3-6 6-7 7-6 70-68

FiBeR is offline  
 
post #64 of 65 (permalink) Old 12-12-2012, 06:21 PM Thread Starter
.
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 33,795
                     
Re: TT Changes 2013

TT Changes 2013

COMMITMENTS


1) Should players be allowed to play in two places at the same time (the final of a week X event AND the qualifying of a week x+1 event)?

Yes/No? (Current rule: yes)
Yes. (No change)


2) Should players who lose in a Grand Slam qualifying be allowed to play a challenger in the following week?

Yes/No/No if qualifying points are introduced? (Current rule: Yes)

Yes. (No change)


3) GS/IW/Miami week 2 events:

GS R16 - out of qualifying; GS QF - out of MD? (current rule)
Players who're still alive in the GS (or IW/Miami) by Saturday (GS R16) should be out of the 2nd week challengers, MD or qualifying?
Players should be able to commit to the 2nd week challengers only after they're out of the GSs/IW/Miami?

Players who're still alive in the GS (or IW/Miami) by Saturday (GS R16) should be out of the 2nd week challengers, MD or qualifying (Rule change).


4) Late entries & SE's:

No restrictions? (current rule)
Players who commit as late entries 48 hours or less before the final deadline shouldn't be eligible to receive a SE?
Players who commit as late entries shouldn't be eligible to receive a SE?
No restrictions (No change).

5) Doubles commitments:

It should be enough if only a player commits the doubles team? (current rule)
Both players in a partnership should commit/confirm before being accepted in the doubles list?

It should be enough if only a player commits the doubles team (No change).


6) Singles commitments by another person?

Yes/No (Current rule: yes)

No (Rule change).


DRAWS


7) Late entries & seedings

No restrictions? (current rule)
Late entries shouldn't be seeded?

No restrictions (No change).

8) Should there be a restriction to avoid singles R1 matches between doubles partners?

Yes/No (Current rule: no)

No (No change).

SENDING PICKS


9) Should picks which were sent to the person who posted the OOP be accepted?

Yes/No (Current rule: no)

No (No change).

10) Should picks sent by e-mail be accepted?

Yes/No/Facebook? (Current rule: yes)

Yes (No change).

11) Should there be a punishment for players who don't send picks?
Yes/No (Current rule: no)

No (No change).


OOP


12) Standard minimum of TT matches in first rounds (4, 5, 6, 7, no restrictions?)

Manager's choice (No change).


13) Standardizing the OOP:

No - Manager's choice (Current rule)
Yes - The order should be decided by the number of differences of each match: more diffs -> higher in the SR order?
Yes - The order should be decided by the order of the matches in the official OOP: left to right or top to bottom?

Manager's choice (No change).


TB System


14) TB method: The number of sets given to the winner when the player picks the loser (2-1, 3-2 & 3-1 losing picks) should be a tie-breaker before the SR shootout.

Yes/No (Curret rule: no)

No (No change).

15) SR Shootout: Picking the correct winner or SR of a lower SR should have priority over giving a set to the winner when both players pick the loser in a higher SR?

Yes/No (Current rule: no)

No (No change).

16) PTS:

Correct order of sets should always beat correct scorelines?
GD should be used as the PTS system?

No change.


RANKING POINTS


17) Qualifying points: There should be points for qualifying wins.

Yes/No (Current rule: no)

Yes (Rule change). Adapted ATP system:

Challengers & Futures - 0 points
ATP 250: First round win (R1 -> final round) - 5 points
ATP 500: First round win (R1 -> final round) - 7 points
Masters: First round win (R1 -> final round) - 13 points
Grand Slam: First round win (R1 -> R2) - 6 points
Grand Slam: Second round win (R2 -> final round) - 13 points


18) There should be a Team Race for the World Tour Finals.

Yes/No (Current rule: no)

WTF - Top 16 doubles players (No change).


OTHERS


19) Retirements should count for SR and shootout purposes (64 40 ret -> 64 60 win; 46 23 ret -> 46 63 60 win)?

No (No change).


21) Possible exception: Accepting picks 1/2/3/4/5 minutes after the deadline?
No (No change).

Wild cards
No (No change).

Ranking system
Current system (No change).
keqtqiadv is offline  
post #65 of 65 (permalink) Old 04-26-2013, 06:08 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
AdeyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 14,184
                     
Re: TT Changes 2013

Bump

You can contact me on my TF Account or adriancollins@hotmail.com. I rarely log on here anymore as became TF Admin.
AdeyC is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome