- View Single Post - Players retiring - Should SRs count or not?
View Single Post
post #20 of (permalink) Old 04-15-2007, 01:27 PM
country flag savesthedizzle
savesthedizzle's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: formerly known as Troickitard
Posts: 93,808
Re: Players retiring - Should SRs count or not?

Originally Posted by keqtqiadv View Post
when a player retires, he's giving the rest of the match to his opponent
That is true, and I do agree with that. I mean if we are counting the match, then the SR should count.

If a match is counted when a player wins 3-6 4-6 0-4 ret, the only possible way for him to have won that match was to come back and win the next three sets. The ratio would HAVE to have been 3:2. And if we are counting him as the winner we should count the ratio he would have won by.

My opinion last night was more of an attempt to be in the middle and compromise, but given more thought, I really do support counting the SR.

Troicki - Djokovic - Del Potro - Kyrgios - Berankis
Cibulkova - Robson - Kirilenko - Azarenka
Retired but always loving Ferrero - Ancic - Kiefer

savesthedizzle is offline  
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome