that's exactly what I'm criticizing, if not every rules break is given an infraction it means mods can arbitrarily decide which posts get a red and which not (providing both are against the rules).
So you want us to dish out more infractions in general? I'm confused.
Here's how I look at it-
Some posts are bad, and probably breaking a rule to a minor extent, but they aren't HORRIBLE. Maybe they'll lead to arguing, and they include a bit of a player attack or something. It would be too much to infract users for EVERY slight fault. These posts are more likely to just be deleted, rather than a harsh punishment. However, if it were to go on and on from the same user, then perhaps something more would have to be done.
Then sometimes, a post is blatantly breaking rules, maybe even vulgarity or whatever, and posted only with the intent of trolling. These deserve a warning/infraction.
It's the difference between giving someone an infraction for posting a picture of the side of a baby's bottom, or posting full frontal adult nudity? One is obviously worse than the other, generally speaking.
I feel like you're really asking us to be more strict, and that is quite confusing. We don't get paid to do this. Everyone is doing things the best they can.
The majority of MTF users get by without ever getting a warning or infraction, to be fair.