Here I'd like to open a somewhat sad, yet interesting topic series, to dig deeper into the "why's" and "how's" of Pete losing in a GRAND SLAM
Part II - 2000 US open - def. by Lleyton Hewitt
I thought that in this Particular match Pete looked really tired, as they say in tennis, there wasn't enough left in the tank, after amazing wins over 3 ex-US open-champs.
It was odd though, I thought Pete played a fine 1st set, but after losing the tie-break, he seemed defenitely lost out there.
- I say he wasn't at his highest level of fitness on the day.
- Also Hewitt was totally over Pete's serve, which seems the key to beating Pete, but Pete maybe made more errors at the net than he usually does.
What are your comments people ???