I think we should review bonus points. Not eliminate, but probably they are not fitting good now.
The biggest problem for me is the quantity of bonus points. As an example, i take Coria (he deserved his US Open title, i'm not complaining). He started with 115 points on hard. In the first tournaments, all players were having kinda the same points. But the players that had more success at the beginning earned lots of bonus points. Now he has 125 points to spend. Against players with 105 points, for example, he has a 20-points advantage, which i think is such big. Winning isn't impossible, but the chances are very reduced. This way, the players with most bonus points will hardly be upset, the other players wouldn't get bonus points and we'll have always the same winners.
I propose bonus points for playing at home soil (as well as playing at the continent) should be abolished. As for the ranking bonus, we should establish a period of validation. I like the way it goes at FMTL. You win bonus points for a title, and then you have them to use (in the title surface) until the same tournament on next season.
Please state your opinions