[QUOTE=Hårdkål;13089338]Because he has a greater probability of winning?
If there are outcomes (winners) A and B of a match, and there are at least two forum comments suggesting A and B will win respectively, then yes – it's no wonder "the winner most times of a given match is always hidden in the comments of people on the forums".
If you've come to such grand, transcendal realizations you should open up an account with Pinnacle Sports and become a billionaire!
The strangest thing. I always imaged there could be a different number of winners than one. Well, now I know – thanks!
How wise you are.
Perhaps he finds Murray ugly. I can see how Murray fanboys are offended.
It's trolling nonetheless, though...
Truth be told, you're a bad gambler if you give Federer the edge and still do not bet at the current odds.
Then again, few would agree such is the case.
Did you realize that I used the word "hidden" in the comments? It simply means that only discerning eyes and minds normally find such comments just like I have. Hidden also means somewhat cryptic. The clue is not always a clear yes as you must be expecting to get from the comments. They are strong provocations from certain comments that lead you to the truth which your inner man confirms. I said in my write-up that the fact that Murray had never playd at night was my biggest indication. It was only supposed to mean something to me who was zoned into what i was zoned into at the time of writing. Go and look at the history of my posts. I never ever take so much time to do a write-up such as yesterday and turn out a fool in the end. All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. I am certainly on a different wave length.