"Reverse Odds Analysis" - Page 4 - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #46 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-22-2006, 11:37 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

NBA Friday 22/12

Magic to cover -4 v Warriors
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #47 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-23-2006, 12:24 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Very unique situation, 2 plays on the one day that fits the bill perfectly

NBA Friday 22/12

Kings to cover +2.5 v Nuggets
post #48 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-23-2006, 11:48 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
NBA Friday 22/12

Magic to cover -4 v Warriors
FT: Warriors 117-108 - LOSS
post #49 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-23-2006, 11:48 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
Very unique situation, 2 plays on the one day that fits the bill perfectly

NBA Friday 22/12

Kings to cover +2.5 v Nuggets
FT: Kings 101-96 - WIN
post #50 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-23-2006, 10:02 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

NBA Saturday 23/12

Heat to cover -5.5 v Warriors
post #51 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-23-2006, 10:15 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

NFL Saturday 23/12

Raiders +7.5 v Chiefs
post #52 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-24-2006, 02:06 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
NBA Saturday 23/12

Heat to cover -5.5 v Warriors
FT: Heat 105-92 - WIN
post #53 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-24-2006, 02:06 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
NFL Saturday 23/12

Raiders +7.5 v Chiefs
FT: Chiefs 20-9 - LOSS
post #54 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-24-2006, 02:09 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

NFL Sunday 24/12

Seahawks to cover +4.5 v Chargers

Jaguars to cover -3 v Patriots
post #55 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-25-2006, 11:30 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
NFL Sunday 24/12

Seahawks to cover +4.5 v Chargers

Jaguars to cover -3 v Patriots
FT: Chargers 20-17 - WIN

FT: Pats 24-21 - LOSS
post #56 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-27-2006, 01:57 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

NBA Tuesday 26/12

Hornets to cover +5.5 v Sonics
post #57 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-27-2006, 02:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: uk
Age: 41
Posts: 116
                     
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Surely the only way to beat sportsbetting is to find a game where the odds are wrong?

For example a match team A vs team B.

You handicap the match as 50% chance of team A winning and 50% chance of team B winning.

The odds are in fact team A 1.6 and team B 2.2.

In this instance the bet on team B has a positive expected value, the bet on team B a negative EV.

There is no other way to beat the bookies. Even if you think you're doing something different you must be doing this if you can proove winning seasons consecutively.

I understand the theory however my handicapping skills are not up to scratch which is why I'm breaking even at best.

I am going to be VERY selective next year and see how I fair.
The Tennis Ninja is offline  
post #58 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-27-2006, 02:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: uk
Age: 41
Posts: 116
                     
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

You're betting far too many games BG.
The Tennis Ninja is offline  
post #59 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-27-2006, 02:39 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Ninja - you have completely missed the point of this thread, read from the start and it will make more sense
post #60 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-27-2006, 08:36 AM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 24,604
                     
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
Ninja - you have completely missed the point of this thread, read from the start and it will make more sense




Horatio Caine is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome