"Reverse Odds Analysis" - Page 3 - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-17-2006, 01:15 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

NBA Saturday 16/12

Kings to cover +2.5 v Suns
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-17-2006, 05:53 AM
Registered User
 
fisherking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,615
                     
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

nice to see you back
fisherking is offline  
post #33 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-17-2006, 12:01 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
NBA Saturday 16/12

Kings to cover +2.5 v Suns
FT: Suns 105-98 - LOSS
post #34 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-17-2006, 12:02 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

NFL Sunday 18/12

Ravens to cover -11 v Browns
post #35 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-17-2006, 01:22 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by fisherking View Post
nice to see you back
Thanks mate, only limited posting until at least Christmas but will be around
post #36 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-18-2006, 09:48 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
NFL Sunday 18/12

Ravens to cover -11 v Browns
FT: Ravens 27-17 - LOSS
post #37 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-18-2006, 09:51 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

I'm not having much success here initially, but this one is the strongest play I have come across when I have decided to do this so lets see what happens. I've also gone quite large on the play myself.

NFL Monday 18/12


Colts to cover -3 v Bengals
post #38 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-19-2006, 10:43 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
I'm not having much success here initially, but this one is the strongest play I have come across when I have decided to do this so lets see what happens. I've also gone quite large on the play myself.

NFL Monday 18/12


Colts to cover -3 v Bengals
FT: Colts 34-16 - WIN
post #39 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-19-2006, 10:56 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

NBA Tuesday 19/12

Suns to cover -13 v Raptors
post #40 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-19-2006, 04:43 PM
Registered User
 
inmeclf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 48
                     
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
NBA Tuesday 19/12

Suns to cover -13 v Raptors
Hey BG,

How is this a reverse line movement? Caribsports has 71.50% on the suns, therefore IMO any (albeit small) line movement in favour of the suns is consquential of weight of money and not vegas looking to make a play on the suns?

Last edited by inmeclf; 12-19-2006 at 06:42 PM. Reason: mispelt vegas
inmeclf is offline  
post #41 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-19-2006, 06:43 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by inmeclf View Post
Hey BG,

How is this a reverse line movement? Caribsports has 71.50% on the suns, therefore IMO any (albeit small) line movement in favour of the suns is consquential of weight of money and not vagas looking to make a play on the suns?
What I am doing is not reverse line movement - reverse odds analysis is a completey different concept

Ask yourself why are the Raptors, a team who have won 3 straight given 13 points, albeit against a red hot team - Suns are not playing the Bobcats here, Raptors are a solid young team who are fresh and are on their first game of a road trip. They shouldn't be getting more then 10 points, especially when they have been an ATS covering machine on the road of late, 4-1 ATS in last 5 games on the road.

Vegas want you to play the Raptors getting what my perception is which is a very very big line in favour of the Raptors - what the public does is inconsequential to this particular theory, I just used it in an example earlier to help me explain the more broader concept of this theory.
post #42 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-19-2006, 07:12 PM
Registered User
 
inmeclf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 48
                     
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

my apologies, i got confused there mate
inmeclf is offline  
post #43 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-20-2006, 01:32 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
NBA Tuesday 19/12

Suns to cover -13 v Raptors
FT: Suns 115-98 - WIN
post #44 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-20-2006, 07:03 PM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

NBA Wednesday 20/12

Warriors to cover +1.5 v Celtics
post #45 of 78 (permalink) Old 12-21-2006, 09:55 AM
bad gambler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: "Reverse Odds Analysis"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bad gambler View Post
NBA Wednesday 20/12

Warriors to cover +1.5 v Celtics
FT: Warriors 96-95 - WIN
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome