“a wolf in sheep’s clothing” is a pretty accurate description.
Oliver Stone to RT: ‘US has become an Orwellian state’
28 December, 2012
Americans are living in an Orwellian state argue Academy Award-winning director Oliver Stone and historian Peter Kuznick as they sit down with RT to discuss US foreign policy and the Obama administration’s disregard for the rule of law. Both argue that Obama is a wolf in sheep’s clothing and that people have forgiven him a lot because of the “nightmare of the Bush presidency that preceded him.”
RT: It took both of you almost five years to produce this series. And in it you have a chapter called Obama: Management of a Wounded Empire. You give a harsh critique of the Obama administration. What in your eyes has been the most troubling aspect of his presidency, Oliver?
Oliver Stone: “I think under the disguise of sheep’s clothing he has been a wolf. That’s because of the nightmare of the Bush presidency that preceded him, people forgave him a lot. He was a great hope for change. The color of his skin, the upbringing, the internationalism, the globalism, seemed all evident. And he is an intelligent man. He has taken all the Bush changes and basically put them into the establishment, he has codified them. That is what is sad. So we are going into the second administration that is living outside the law and does not respect the law and foundations of our system, and he is a constitutional lawyer, you know. Without the law, it is the law of the jungle. Nuremburg existed for a reason and there was a reason to have trials, there is a reason for due process – ‘habeas corpus’ as they call it in the United States. “
RT: Do you agree Peter?
Peter Kuznick: “I agree. If you look at his domestic policy, he did not break with the Bush administration’s policies. If you look at his transparency – he claimed to be the transparency president when he was running for office. There has not been transparency. We have been actually classifying more documents under Obama than we did under Bush. All previous presidents between 1970 and 2008 indicted three people total under the Espionage Act. Obama has already indicted six people under the Espionage Act. The surveillance has not stopped. The incarceration without bringing people to trial has not stopped. So those policies have continued."
“Then there are war policies, militarization policies. We are maintaining that. We are fighting wars now in Yemen, Afghanistan, we are keeping troops in Afghanistan. We have not cut back the things that we all found so odious about the Bush administration and Obama has added some of his own. The drones policy – Obama had more drone attacks in the first eight months than Bush had his entire presidency. And these have very dubious international legality."
OS: “Peter was hopeful that in the second term there will be some more flexibility, we hope so. But, there is a system in place which is enormous – the Pentagon system.”
RT: It almost seems like they took the odious CIA policies and just rebranded them so it is now acceptable – the assassinations, the extrajudicial executioner without the due process. It is fascinating.
PK: “We complained during the Bush years that Bush was actually conducting surveillance without judiciary review. Obama is killing people - targeted assassinations without judiciary review. That to us is obviously much more serious.”
RT: You also cover Pearl Harbor, which of course led to the internment of Japanese American citizens. I do not think a lot of people acknowledge that once again underreported aspect of really what that meant. When you look at the surveillance grid in America today it almost seems like it is an open-air internment camp, where they do not need to intern people anymore because we have this grid set up in place. What do you guys think about that?
PK: “The US government now intercepts more than 1.7 billion messages a day from American citizens. That is email, telephone calls, and other forms of communication. Can you imagine: 1.7 billion? We’ve got this apparatus set up now with hundreds of thousands of people and over a million people with top security clearance in this kind of nightmarish state, this 1984 kind of state.”
OS: “One million top security clearances. That is a pretty heavy number. In other words, we are living in a fish pond and I think the sad part is that the younger people accept that. They are used to the invasion. And that is true, how can we follow the lives of everybody? But the truth is that we are all ultimately watching ourselves. It is an Orwellian state. It might not be oppressive on the surface, but there is no place to hide. Some part of you is going to end up in the database somewhere.”
oliver stone is just controlled opposition but he still has some good points. the world is rapidly moving toward an orwellian state, not just the u.s.