Socialism sucks....seriously. - Page 8 - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #106 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 01:19 AM
Anathemaniac
 
Sunset of Age's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Wall.
Posts: 41,908
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

^^ Interesting comments, Lopez.
Food-for-thought. I won't say I disagree.

Still nothing will stop me from aiding my clients to help them around with their financial problems in this rather SHARK-kind of a society.
Uh yeah, Eat-the-Rich.
That's my job.

"It's getting colder, I'm getting colder, older, it's getting colder...

Am I still here? As one, with The Fear?
Am I still alive? I'm still f*cking ... Here...!"


"The Storm Before The Calm"

Anathema

Into music of the PROG-Dorky-kind? visit my blog or MTF's Prog Rock Thread.
Sunset of Age is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #107 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 01:26 AM
Registered User
 
Lopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 30
Posts: 7,507
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunset of Age View Post
^^ Interesting comments, Lopez.
Food-for-thought. I won't say I disagree.

Still nothing will stop me from aiding my clients to help them around with their financial problems in this rather SHARK-kind of a society.
Uh yeah, Eat-the-Rich.
That's my job.
I thought you were a biologist or something . Didn't know you were Robin Hood

After Nadal beat Monfils at Doha, before AO 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSMnadal View Post
lol, who will beat him? Wawrinka? Berdych? Gulbis? Rosol? Federer?

Only Del Potro can take him out before the semis, and he won't. Nadal is winning the AO, bet your house on it.
Somewhere out there, there is a homeless person who once took betting advice from GSMnadal
Lopez is offline  
post #108 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 01:33 AM
Anathemaniac
 
Sunset of Age's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Wall.
Posts: 41,908
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lopez View Post
I thought you were a biologist or something . Didn't know you were Robin Hood
Medical Biologist, MSc. obtained in 1986, Utrecht University, NL.
Lawyer, LLM obtained in 2002, Utrecht University Law School, NL.

Robin Hood - ever since my birth.
Or rather - Maid Marian.

No kidding though, my current job is helping out folks who have become totally fucked up in their current financial situation.
That might well explain why I have these so-called 'socialist' tendencies nowadays.

"It's getting colder, I'm getting colder, older, it's getting colder...

Am I still here? As one, with The Fear?
Am I still alive? I'm still f*cking ... Here...!"


"The Storm Before The Calm"

Anathema

Into music of the PROG-Dorky-kind? visit my blog or MTF's Prog Rock Thread.

Last edited by Sunset of Age; 05-06-2012 at 01:48 AM.
Sunset of Age is offline  
post #109 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 01:44 AM
Registered User
 
Lopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 30
Posts: 7,507
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunset of Age View Post
Medical Biologist, MSc. obtained in 1986, Utrecht University, NL.
Lawyer, LLM obtained in 2002, Utrecht University Law School, NL.

Robin Hood - ever since my birth.
Or rather - Maid Marian.
Career switch, bold move

Anyways I've explained my views about the issue a few pages before. The state should do certain things but then be as small as possible once these things are arranged (education, healthcare, police to name a few).

The problem with high income tax is that it really doesn't even affect the really rich since one can only become rich through capital such as being a successful entrepreneur. Thus, high income taxes actually hit the middle class the most since it makes it difficult to create wealth through work alone and it also dicincentivises pay raises etc...

High capital gains tax is also problematic because capital is one of the building blocks of a nation's GDP. To achieve GDP growth you need growth in capital, human capital or level of technology. High capital gains tax drives capital away from a nation.

There is a strong correlation with many positive effects to a society and the level of economic freedom within that society. I can dig out the information if you'd like. They include things like smaller absolute poverty and higher life expectancy and higher overall happiness IIRC.

After Nadal beat Monfils at Doha, before AO 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSMnadal View Post
lol, who will beat him? Wawrinka? Berdych? Gulbis? Rosol? Federer?

Only Del Potro can take him out before the semis, and he won't. Nadal is winning the AO, bet your house on it.
Somewhere out there, there is a homeless person who once took betting advice from GSMnadal
Lopez is offline  
post #110 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 02:01 AM
Anathemaniac
 
Sunset of Age's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Wall.
Posts: 41,908
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lopez View Post
Career switch, bold move
I had to. I was a total failure in medical cancer research, all of my research attempts at getting my PhD were a complete disaster.
Never mind the fact that some 99% of my colleagues at that time ended up being computer programmers anyhows.
A career as a biologist? haha, no way. Too bad nobody tells you so when you're 17 years of age.

Quote:
Anyways I've explained my views about the issue a few pages before. The state should do certain things but then be as small as possible once these things are arranged (education, healthcare, police to name a few).

The problem with high income tax is that it really doesn't even affect the really rich since one can only become rich through capital such as being a successful entrepreneur. Thus, high income taxes actually hit the middle class the most since it makes it difficult to create wealth through work alone and it also dicincentivises pay raises etc...

High capital gains tax is also problematic because capital is one of the building blocks of a nation's GDP. To achieve GDP growth you need growth in capital, human capital or level of technology. High capital gains tax drives capital away from a nation.

There is a strong correlation with many positive effects to a society and the level of economic freedom within that society. I can dig out the information if you'd like. They include things like smaller absolute poverty and higher life expectancy and higher overall happiness IIRC.
Yep, I see your points, and they are true, unfortunately...
Whatever that, it won't help me stop at my attempts to try as much as I can to help the folks who've been a mite lesser lucky with their talents to achieve themselves getting themselves a 'better' living.
It's the only thing I can do.

Funny thing is, my BF comes from a very rich posh family, and his sister is... a spokeslady for the Socialist Party in my country. She feels she just has to.
No wonder we get along rather well.

"It's getting colder, I'm getting colder, older, it's getting colder...

Am I still here? As one, with The Fear?
Am I still alive? I'm still f*cking ... Here...!"


"The Storm Before The Calm"

Anathema

Into music of the PROG-Dorky-kind? visit my blog or MTF's Prog Rock Thread.

Last edited by Sunset of Age; 05-06-2012 at 02:24 AM.
Sunset of Age is offline  
post #111 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 02:32 AM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sen'jin Village
Age: 33
Posts: 18,509
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
i fully disagree. for starters, it's a moral duty to to rise up to unfairness and injustice and to that regard the people have the power to demand the government for change or even to overthrow the ones in power if their political stances are too far away from the people's basic aspirations.

fortunately history shows us that humanity doesn't share your values. otherwise who knows? europe might still be ruled by feudal kings and your country would still be a british colony....

i might reply to your other post tomorrow
Incorrect. Those with power will always take advantage of those without power no matter how advanced a particular society is. It's a basic survival mechanism to cull the weak. What you suggest is mere wishful thinking rather than reality. At the end of the day we're still animals - except we're ripping out each other's throat in a more civilized manner.
Topspindoctor is offline  
post #112 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 08:51 AM
Registered User
 
Shinoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: My Flag
Posts: 4,441
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

I disagree. When the autocracies do get out of hand, people do decide to act against it and no matter how much stronger the government is, it will be overthrown. Case in point is Libya and Egypt.
Shinoj is offline  
post #113 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 08:54 AM
Registered User
 
Shinoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: My Flag
Posts: 4,441
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeleni View Post
As some posters have already written, essence is not about names and ready-made ideological concepts, it is about actual situation and government policy in particular case (country) in particular time.

The goal should be to find the right balance between freedom and solidarity. Nordic counties are probably the closest to that, which doesn't mean that their model can be applied successfully everywhere because of cultural differences.

Today it is easy to bash socialism and so with good reason. But I don't think it's fair to forget role of socialism in fight against colonialism and fascism/nazism. Also in some counties socialism (or so-called socialism, as I explained in the first paragraph) gave good results - China before socialism was devastated prey of colonial powers (UK, Japan). Now they are becoming the biggest economy in the world and their people have the highest level of human rights than ever in their very long history (things should always be observed in their context, not in some ideologically imposed artificial context of "universal" human rights).

Also, capitalism apologist seed to forget that numerous failed states in Africa, Latin America and Asia are capitalist countries. They always point on one dozen of richest countries where it is hard to say how much of their wealth is due to capitalism and hard work and how much due to colonialism and plunder.

Things seems to be more gray and blear than apologist of any paper concept (capitalism, socialism) would like to admit.
Very good post.
Shinoj is offline  
post #114 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 04:23 PM
Registered User
 
Dougie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,907
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimnik View Post
You should move to a socialist country. No greed, just millions of people starving to death and dissidents tortured in concentration camps. But as long as bankers aren't making millions, that's clearly all that matters.
This is the attitude that is so common nowadays, even if itīs a totally ridicilous one. Anyone who even dares to suggest that maybe some more left-wing policies in certain areas might not be so wrong is instantly labeled as someone who supports concentration camps and is a fan of Stalins USSR or whatever. Its not black and white, you know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lopez View Post
As an economics student who's looked quite a bit into the crisis, I can confidently say that it had very little to do with capitalism and everything to do with non-transparent financial instruments and thus a gross misinterpretation of risk combined with poor incentive systems and a faulty way of how credit agencies work. On a free market, this crisis wouldn't have happened.

Besides, capitalism is a word often misused. At it's core, it means that people have the right to own property and machines used for production. Almost every country in the world is capitalist.

Now, it's altogether a different question how much a state should be a part of the economy and society and where in the society should the state take part.
All the reasons you listed are completely true, but arenīt those reasons made possible by the extreme form of capitalism? Im not saying itīs the capitalism itself that is to blame, but a capitalist system is the system under which these things got to develop as far as they did. The roots of the crisis go back to the 80īs, when the goverment regulation was lessened, and the argument was exactly the free market. "Let the markets operate, the market will fix itself".

What could have prevented the crsisis would have been exactly that regulation, transparency, investor responsibility etc. It might have prevented that over-aggressive risk taking and bad incentive systems. And Im not talking about communism, but I think its clear that the state needs to play a certain role. Is it an ideal situation? Far form it, but nothing ever is.
Dougie is offline  
post #115 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 05:20 PM
Registered User
 
Chris 84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,555
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimnik View Post
And I'm saying this is nothing more than a paranoid accusation. You've still provided no evidence that I've been "swallowing propaganda" when my views contradict almost everything we watch and read in the media.



That IS where you are wrong. A welfare state that only interferes with 50% of the economy is a liberal system. It consists of both capitalist and socialist aspects. I stopped reading and watching British media after calls for nationalizing banks, capping private sector pay and returning to a 1970s labour model where trade unions hold the nation to ransom. This leans far more towards socialism than capitalism.




Like I said (I'm repeating myself over and over again), in a truly democratic society, I will always condemn protesting when people have official peaceful means to resolve issues. Not once have I ever seen a protest in a western nation with rational demands. No matter what the government does, there will always be a minority finding an excuse to complain about something. Peaceful protesting shouldn't be made illegal, but in a proven democratic society I will never respect it.



Because those were NOT proven democratic societies. A system in which certain minorities have no say is not democratic. I would completely condone protesting in Cuba, North Korea, Iran or any society in which totalitarian regime was enforced on the people. Comparing 21st century protests on bankers pay to 19th century fights for black rights is nonsensical.
1st paragraph - if you say so. you are totally wrong, but what's the point in arguing with you on that when you'll never admit to it?

2nd paragraph - "a liberal system" makes no sense. a liberal economic system means absolutely nothing. it could be absolutely anything. however, liberty as a political idea generally stems from the rise of the middle classes and the rise of capitalism. you totally fail to understand the economy in general and capitalism and socialism in particular if you are of the opinion that a capitalist system with certain welfare concessions is more socialist than capitalist. it is truly baffling that you claim that.

3rd/4th paragraph - demonstrating IS an official, peaceful method of resolving things. it is a key part of any democracy, and to argue otherwise is simply blind. you still haven't answered the question that i asked of you when i said that you yourself had said "there is more to a democratic system than voting every 4 or 5 years". what else is there? surely demonstrating is one thing?

as regards your final point, the american civil rights movement comes to mind. that wasn't so long ago. blacks could vote at that time. your argument means that you are saying all the people who took part in civil rights demonstrations in the 60s, which led to greater fairness, etc, were in the wrong and were nothing but a bunch of whiners and complainers.

in any event, what is a proven democracy? is it whatever you say it is? is a totalitarian state whatever you define such a state as? is it democratic that when more people vote for one presidential candidate than his opponent, the opponent still gets elected?
Chris 84 is offline  
post #116 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 06:58 PM
.
 
rocketassist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 29,374
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Yeah socialism is shit. That's why Francois Hollande is set to become the new president of France

unbiased analyst extraordinaire
rocketassist is offline  
post #117 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 07:07 PM
Registered User
 
Echoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Age: 34
Posts: 1,902
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

He clearly implied in YOUR country that he was not a socialist. The left liberalized the economy in France under President Mitterrand.

Confirming my assumption that socialism is incompatible with political/philosophical left.
Echoes is offline  
post #118 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 07:20 PM
Registered User
 
Chris 84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,555
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketassist View Post
Yeah socialism is shit. That's why Francois Hollande is set to become the new president of France
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echoes View Post
He clearly implied in YOUR country that he was not a socialist. The left liberalized the economy in France under President Mitterrand.

Confirming my assumption that socialism is incompatible with political/philosophical left.
the french socialist party are far from socialist. social democrats, sure. further left-leaning than sarkozy (or the tories, labour, republicans, democrats, etc), sure....but hardly far left firebrands.
Chris 84 is offline  
post #119 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 07:41 PM
Registered User
 
Lopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 30
Posts: 7,507
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dougie View Post
All the reasons you listed are completely true, but arenīt those reasons made possible by the extreme form of capitalism? Im not saying itīs the capitalism itself that is to blame, but a capitalist system is the system under which these things got to develop as far as they did. The roots of the crisis go back to the 80īs, when the goverment regulation was lessened, and the argument was exactly the free market. "Let the markets operate, the market will fix itself".
Well, yes and no I think. As I said, at it's core capitalism just means that people can own things. You could just as easily say that this crisis happened under a democratic system and thus democracy is to blame.

This was a bubble, which tend to happen every now and then. The problem with the fixed income market as a whole is that it is HUGE compared to the stock market and yet there are few players. The market is thus not as effective as the stock exchanges, not by a long shot. The bubble was thus inflated to a huge size before it burst.

What actually could have prevented the whole mess would have been credit agencies that actually do their job, so there perhaps a government agency could do a better job since it couldn't be bullied by its customers. In that sense regulation would have improved things in my opinion.

Put it another way: as long as risk is priced properly, everything is ok. Regulation might help, especially in the huge and relatively ineffective fixed income markets.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketassist View Post
Yeah socialism is shit. That's why Francois Hollande is set to become the new president of France
As if that's an argument

After Nadal beat Monfils at Doha, before AO 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by GSMnadal View Post
lol, who will beat him? Wawrinka? Berdych? Gulbis? Rosol? Federer?

Only Del Potro can take him out before the semis, and he won't. Nadal is winning the AO, bet your house on it.
Somewhere out there, there is a homeless person who once took betting advice from GSMnadal
Lopez is offline  
post #120 of 211 (permalink) Old 05-06-2012, 07:41 PM
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 39
Posts: 53,509
                     
Re: Socialism sucks....seriously.

Allez Hollande!
scoobs is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome