Could this thread possibly have been titled more awkwardly?
It reads like one of those laughably incorrect grammar examples in a multiple-choice question in a standardized test, e.g.:
Which sentence is best?
A. Entering the room, the cat, going up to the milk, drinks.
B. The cat, to go up to the milk in the room, enters, and drinks it.
C. The cat enters the room, goes up to the milk, and drinks it.
D. Drinkingly entering the milk-containing room is the cat, who, going up to it, does.
And that's to say nothing of how absurdly disingenuous the question is in the first place.
Men rate looks first, personality doesn't matter. This means Women with large guts are less likely to be approached by Bilbo. Time to grow those guts, ladies.
Pretty close to Seingeist's amazing post.
Look at that ass...
I just corrected you.
I like your sarcastic posts about men and looks of women. It has been proven since many decades that men rate looks first. If you do not believe that, it is your problem. Ever heard conversations of men about women? Usually the first question that pops up is "How does she look like?". For women it is usually "How is he like?". Guess why women spent 2 hours in the bathroom before going to the club. They know their chance is highest, the better they look. That is why a lot of girls look hot in the club, but average on the next day. You also rarely see ugly girls in a club, because they know they have no real chance.
What's with your obsession with clubs? Is that the only place where you get any action? I mean, that's pretty sad. Also, this may be shocking to you, but some girls (guys too, probably) actually go to a club just to have a good time with their friends with no intention of hooking up with random horny strangers. I've seen shit-ugly people - guys and girls - in clubs before (to the extent that I can even make out what they look like in the darkness), so I'm not sure what your point is.