South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 67 (permalink) Old 12-29-2011, 07:25 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,797
                     
South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Stanley in the Falkland Islands Argentina has long claimed sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, which lie 400 miles from its coast

A South American trading bloc has agreed to close its ports to ships flying the Falkland Islands flag.

Mercosur, which includes Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay, came to the decision at a summit in the Uruguayan capital, Montevideo.

But Uruguayan President Jose Mujica said British-flagged civilian ships that may supply the islands would still be allowed to use its ports.

The Foreign Office said there was "no justification" for the action.

The Falklands flag is flown by 25 boats, mostly fishing vessels operated in joint ventures with Spanish companies.

The Mercosur decision is the latest in a series by Latin American regional bodies designed to show solidarity with Argentina which has long claimed sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, which it calls Las Malvinas.

Britain has held them since the 1830s and says their future is not negotiable. The two countries fought a brief but bloody war over the islands in 1982.

Their dispute has flared again recently. Last year, Argentina accused the UK of breaking international rules by allowing oil drilling under a seabed off the islands, located in a vast area of potentially mineral-rich South Atlantic waters.
'Very concerned'

Britain has also refused recent requests to re-open negotiations on the sovereignty of the Falklands.

Uruguay proposed the move to close ports to Falklands-flagged vessels. Mr Mujica said: "We hold nothing against the UK. But we have a lot in favour of Argentina."
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote

Malvinas is not an Argentine cause, it is a global cause, because in the Malvinas they are taking our oil and fishing resource”

Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner Argentinian President

He said solidarity among South America's neighbours was key to his country's foreign policy, adding: "For the moment, this means accepting that this territory is a colonial British position in our America."

However, the president of the Falklands Chamber of Commerce, Roger Spink, told the BBC that they were a small community, and felt increasingly under blockade.

"If we were Palestine, the European Union would be up in arms," he said.

The Foreign Office, who called on Uruguay's ambassador in London to explain the move last week, said it was discussing the developments "urgently with countries in the region".

A spokesman said: "We are very concerned by this latest Argentine attempt to isolate the Falkland Islands people and damage their livelihoods, for which there is no justification.

"It is not immediately clear what practical impact, if any, this statement will have, which mirrors the language already used by the Union of South American Nations in 2010.

"But no-one should doubt our determination to protect the Falkland Islanders' right to determine their own political future."
Oil exploration

The Foreign Office called on Uruguay's ambassador in London to explain the move last week.

The chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, Richard Ottaway, said the situation was "very unsatisfactory", with the ban seeming to be a breach of international law and tensions in the region escalating.

Tory MP Patrick Mercer called the ban "needlessly provocative".

Shadow foreign minister John Spellar said: "While this looks like a bit of a flag-waving gesture, Argentina should be in no doubt of the united determination of all parties in the United Kingdom to protect the Falkland Islanders' right to determine their own future."

But former Foreign Office minister Denis MacShane said the "hostile action" was aimed at London, not the Falklands, and blamed the coalition for weakening Britain's international standing.

The Labour MP said: "South American leaders know that Britain has fewer friends than ever before because of David Cameron's isolationist approach in Europe and the indifference to the Obama administration as most cabinet members are close to US neo-Cons.

"Brazil and other countries know that thanks to Liam Fox's defence cuts, the UK no longer has aircraft carrier capability so British maritime power projection has been fatally weakened by the government."

Argentina's President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, who took over the presidency of the trade bloc from Mr Mujica, thanked her fellow presidents for the show of support.

Delivering a speech to the summit, she said: "Malvinas is not an Argentine cause, it is a global cause, because in the Malvinas they are taking our oil and fishing resources.

"And when there is need for more resources, those who are strong are going to look for them wherever and however they can."

British companies are exploring for oil in the waters surrounding the islands, which are 400 nautical miles from the Argentine coast.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16280613
Chair Umpire is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 67 (permalink) Old 12-29-2011, 09:18 PM
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 53,509
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

For my part as a Brit, I think we should give the damn islands back - it costs the British taxpayer a fortune to defend them - and to subsidise the Falkland Islanders themselves - and even if it is discovered that there's oil resources in the area, the British would struggle to exploit them without incurring a lot of trouble from South America - which on this issue is far more united than, say, 1982.

I don't think belligerence on the part of the Argentinian government is helpful, but then again I doubt a hearts and flowers policy would do any good either - the British Government maintains a policy of self-determination being key - the Falklanders' wishes are paramount - though why the Falklanders get this right when citizens on mainland Britain have no right to expect such a thing is anybody's guess. Clearly there will be no negotiations or flexibility shown by this current Government, a Tory Government with strong Thatcherite leanings on the eve of the 30th anniversary of the war, forget it.
scoobs is offline  
post #3 of 67 (permalink) Old 12-29-2011, 09:53 PM
.
 
rocketassist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 28,833
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Fuck giving them back to Argentina. I personally reckon they should just grant the Falklands full independence as a sovereign nation.

unbiased analyst extraordinaire
rocketassist is offline  
post #4 of 67 (permalink) Old 12-29-2011, 09:59 PM
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 53,509
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Ummm....they don't want that, being as they are heavily subsidised by the British taxpayer.
scoobs is offline  
post #5 of 67 (permalink) Old 12-30-2011, 01:06 PM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,583
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

We should not 'give them back' imo - mainly because they were never Argentina's in the first place. The only claim to them they have is in terms of geography.
safin-rules-no.1 is offline  
post #6 of 67 (permalink) Old 12-30-2011, 01:48 PM
Registered User
 
orangehat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 11,459
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by safin-rules-no.1 View Post
We should not 'give them back' imo - mainly because they were never Argentina's in the first place. The only claim to them they have is in terms of geography.
And the british claim to them is what exactly again? (Don't answer with official British rule currently/historically due to expansionism/imperialism)

Tennis Tipping

Singles: (--/10) Finals: 1-5 ATP, 3-1 Challengers
W: Rotterdam '12
Slams:1R,3R,3R,QF

Doubles: (--/5) Finals: 3-4 ATP, 8-7 Challengers
W: US Open '12 (w/Allez-Alejo), Bercy '11 (w/ZackBusner), Winston-Salem '12 (w/Betty)
Slams:2R,3R,QF,W
orangehat is offline  
post #7 of 67 (permalink) Old 12-30-2011, 03:30 PM
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 15,356
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Possession

JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline  
post #8 of 67 (permalink) Old 12-30-2011, 03:37 PM
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 12,881
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by safin-rules-no.1 View Post
We should not 'give them back' imo - mainly because they were never Argentina's in the first place. The only claim to them they have is in terms of geography.
categorically false

abraxas21 is offline  
post #9 of 67 (permalink) Old 12-31-2011, 09:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nirvana
Posts: 7,258
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Britain had settlers there before Argentina was even a country.

The locals had a referendum and chose to remain as part of Great Britain. End of story.

The SA contingent would be useless if it came down to a war.

There an only be One Nadal
Quote:
Nadal, Roddick, Tsonga, Del Potro & Safin
Quote:
Pele was the black Rooney
Quote:
Originally Posted by George W Bush
"We must always remember that all human beings begin life as a feces. A Feces is a living being in the eyes of God, who has endowed that feces with all of the rights and God-given blessings of any other human being."
Black Adam is offline  
post #10 of 67 (permalink) Old 12-31-2011, 11:05 PM
Senior Member
 
shotgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,570
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Adam View Post
The SA contingent would be useless if it came down to a war.
Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay don't care enough about this issue to get involved in a war with the Brits anyway, it's more about Mercosur politics than anything else.

This is very different from 1982.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaap View Post
The tennis equivalent of two old bald men fighting over a comb.
shotgun is offline  
post #11 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-01-2012, 07:59 PM
Banned!
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,583
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by orangehat View Post
And the british claim to them is what exactly again? (Don't answer with official British rule currently/historically due to expansionism/imperialism)
Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
categorically false
l
l
l
l
v
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Adam View Post
Britain had settlers there before Argentina was even a country.

The locals had a referendum and chose to remain as part of Great Britain. End of story.
safin-rules-no.1 is offline  
post #12 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 05:28 AM
Registered User
 
orangehat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 11,459
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

It's just classic he claims she claims here.

British claim settlers while Argentina claims expelled settlers due to British presence. Who is to determine which is true? What is history, but a fable agreed upon?

Tennis Tipping

Singles: (--/10) Finals: 1-5 ATP, 3-1 Challengers
W: Rotterdam '12
Slams:1R,3R,3R,QF

Doubles: (--/5) Finals: 3-4 ATP, 8-7 Challengers
W: US Open '12 (w/Allez-Alejo), Bercy '11 (w/ZackBusner), Winston-Salem '12 (w/Betty)
Slams:2R,3R,QF,W
orangehat is offline  
post #13 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 05:39 AM
Moderator
 
ibreak4coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 12,217
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

He said, she said - true. But to me why Britain thinks its so important to hold on to these small islands in the 21st century is kind of a mystery. Empire is long dead, and I'm not sure realistically how much prestige they can derive from having them.
ibreak4coffee is offline  
post #14 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 05:49 AM
Registered User
 
shiaben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,039
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Never found out what the purpose of these islands were.
shiaben is offline  
post #15 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 12:57 PM
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 15,356
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by ibreak4coffee View Post
He said, she said - true. But to me why Britain thinks its so important to hold on to these small islands in the 21st century is kind of a mystery. Empire is long dead, and I'm not sure realistically how much prestige they can derive from having them.
No mystery. Oil. I mean, why would you think Argentina would want them, if it is a mystery to you why Britain would want them.?

JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome