South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports - Page 2 - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 02:27 PM
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 53,509
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyholly View Post
No mystery. Oil. I mean, why would you think Argentina would want them, if it is a mystery to you why Britain would want them.?
Argentina wanting them back pre-dates the formation of the United Nations, before there was even an inkling of any possibility of oil in the area.
scoobs is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 02:38 PM
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 12,934
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Adam View Post
Britain had settlers there before Argentina was even a country.
french were the first ones. by your criterion france should claim the islands too perhaps?

abraxas21 is offline  
post #18 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 03:17 PM
Moderator
 
ibreak4coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 13,061
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyholly View Post
No mystery. Oil. I mean, why would you think Argentina would want them, if it is a mystery to you why Britain would want them.?
Previous explorations around the Falklands have raised questions about the viability of extracting enough oil to make the investment worth it.

As for why Argentina might want the islands - taking aside natural resources, I'm sure England would have a problem if say Argentina had seized the Isle of Man or Guernsey.
ibreak4coffee is offline  
post #19 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 04:21 PM
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 15,542
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by ibreak4coffee View Post

As for why Argentina might want the islands - taking aside natural resources, I'm sure England would have a problem if say Argentina had seized the Isle of Man or Guernsey.
A small one, easily rectified.

JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline  
post #20 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 04:22 PM
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 15,542
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoobs View Post
Argentina wanting them back pre-dates the formation of the United Nations, before there was even an inkling of any possibility of oil in the area.
OK, forget the oil, then why would they want them?

Wanting them ''back'' may not be a relevant argument. Britain can equal that reason.

JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline  
post #21 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 04:37 PM
.
 
rocketassist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 29,028
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

There's no reason to have them other than nationalistic pride.

Sure they rely on the UK's riches but independence should be an option ahead of handing them back to Argentina.

unbiased analyst extraordinaire
rocketassist is offline  
post #22 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 04:57 PM
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 53,509
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

It's just unfortunate to me that the war in 1982 has set back indefinitely the prospects of a sane resolution to this situation.

It costs the UK taxpayer a disproportionate amount of defence budget and skews our defence posture to protect a tiny group of islanders 6,000 miles away who evidently will use their "let me stay British" veto to maintain this status quo irrespective of larger issues - like how much better the UK's relationship with Argentina and South America might be if this "colonial issue" were resolved - it could be very beneficial for trade links, for example.

The 1982 invasion by the Argentinian Junta was grade A stupid, and it's a shame that, and British intransigence as a result, has frozen the situation in place. It is surely time for the UK Government to return to the position it was following in the 1970s under both Labour and Conservative governments, that of negotiating the sovereignty of the Falklands with Argentina, perhaps under some sort of leaseback scheme, similar to that which the UK had with China for Hong Kong.

Bearing in mind at the time of the Falklands, it would have been cheaper to give every islander (less than 3000) £1 million to relocate than it ultimately cost to re-take the islands on their behalf.

It's economic madness being overridden by pointless, jingoistic, nationalistic nonsense that we can no longer afford. Time to get back to the negotiating table.
scoobs is offline  
post #23 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 05:28 PM
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 12,934
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyholly View Post
OK, forget the oil, then why would they want them?

Wanting them ''back'' may not be a relevant argument. Britain can equal that reason.
cant say im surprised to see you again defending the interests of the crown. God bless mother England. may her sun never set!

abraxas21 is offline  
post #24 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-02-2012, 06:44 PM
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 15,542
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
cant say im surprised to see you again defending the interests of the crown. God bless mother England. may her sun never set!
Amen to that, brother!

Those war-mongering imperialist yank clowns would be in Toronto tomorrow if it wasn't for the Thatcher legacy (in a cinema near you.)

JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY

Last edited by buddyholly; 01-02-2012 at 06:57 PM.
buddyholly is offline  
post #25 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-03-2012, 01:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nirvana
Posts: 7,266
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
french were the first ones. by your criterion france should claim the islands too perhaps?
Well done punk. Conveniently forgetting the results of the referendum held by the locals as I mentioned.

There an only be One Nadal
Quote:
Nadal, Roddick, Tsonga, Del Potro & Safin
Quote:
Pele was the black Rooney
Quote:
Originally Posted by George W Bush
"We must always remember that all human beings begin life as a feces. A Feces is a living being in the eyes of God, who has endowed that feces with all of the rights and God-given blessings of any other human being."
Black Adam is offline  
post #26 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-03-2012, 01:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nirvana
Posts: 7,266
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

We give Brazil £9 billion in annual aid, perhaps they need to be careful where they stand on these matters as Aid could be cut.


P.S. They have a bigger economy, we shouldn't be helping them in the first place.

There an only be One Nadal
Quote:
Nadal, Roddick, Tsonga, Del Potro & Safin
Quote:
Pele was the black Rooney
Quote:
Originally Posted by George W Bush
"We must always remember that all human beings begin life as a feces. A Feces is a living being in the eyes of God, who has endowed that feces with all of the rights and God-given blessings of any other human being."
Black Adam is offline  
post #27 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-03-2012, 01:27 AM
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 15,542
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Adam View Post
We give Brazil £9 billion in annual aid, perhaps they need to be careful where they stand on these matters as Aid could be cut.


P.S. They have a bigger economy, we shouldn't be helping them in the first place.
Don't worry. When Glennmirnyi is President, Brazil will give it all back with interest.

JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline  
post #28 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-03-2012, 02:54 AM
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 12,934
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Adam View Post
We give Brazil £9 billion in annual aid, perhaps they need to be careful where they stand on these matters as Aid could be cut.


P.S. They have a bigger economy, we shouldn't be helping them in the first place.
i was quite suspicious of that amount so i googled it up and surprise, surprise, the first result was a 4 day old article from the ever glorious daily mail. going by your clown posting history, i assume you're an avid reader of it

but anyhow, the fact of the matter is that britain gives 9 billions in annual aid worldwide, not just to brazil. that's a disctinction that was clear even in the daily mail article but i guess one shouldn't expect much from the reading comprehension of its regular readers. much less some critical analysis...

abraxas21 is offline  
post #29 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-03-2012, 03:01 AM
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 12,934
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Adam View Post
Well done punk. Conveniently forgetting the results of the referendum held by the locals as I mentioned.
i like your style.

you're like the typical southern english tory chav, aren't you? i wonder what you're doing in australia....

im not sure who i prefer, BH or you. i feel the differences are more in the form than in the content. while one expresses his points in a rather pompous and sarcastic manner like some type of neo-con hawk, the other is more of the average clown you could find semi drunk downing his pint in the bar around the corner. two different fellas but at the end the story repeats itself. it is as they say: same shit, different bucket.


Last edited by abraxas21; 01-03-2012 at 03:08 AM.
abraxas21 is offline  
post #30 of 67 (permalink) Old 01-03-2012, 03:49 AM
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 15,542
                     
Re: South American states ban Falklands vessels from ports

I'm not a clown and I drink gin, you moron!

JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY

Last edited by buddyholly; 01-03-2012 at 03:57 AM.
buddyholly is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome