Reading that whole article, the first thing that strikes me is the number of quotes from prominent scientists, stating that evolution is a fact. Yet you stated a few posts ago that ''no scientist will claim it's been proven beyond doubt.'' In fact, that link goes to great lengths to explain the difference between ''evolution'' and ''theory of evolution''.
When you say that evolution is officially a theory, you are ignoring what that article also states: Evolution is a fact and the theory of evolution attempts to explain the mechanisms of evolution.
Parallel to your argument is the statement "Gravity is officially a theory.'' But gravity is a fact and the Theory of Gravity attempts to explain the mechanisms of gravity.
I think your conclusion that evolution is officially a theory is wrong. The Theory of Evolution is officially a theory, not evolution itself.
So we know it exists we just can't verify the details of how or why it works. I don't even know why we're arguing about this since I've already stated it's by far the most plausible theory and should be taught in schools.
About 20 seconds actually. Why should I waste my time spoon feeding you?
If that were true you would have posted it. You're already wasting your time obsessing over evolution "fact vs theory" in a politics thread, without posting a single link to back up your claims. You obviously like to spend more time trolling than proving your point.