Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media? - Page 2 - MensTennisForums.com

View Poll Results: Are western lives presented as more valuable in world media?
Yes, sadly I think so 26 76.47%
No, I dont believe this 5 14.71%
Im undecided on this issue 3 8.82%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 131 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 10:16 PM
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 15,542
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
sadly, yes. especially if you're white. western media will do anything to protect the lives of white people.
The media protects lives? And only white people? WOW. Good to know. If I get in trouble I won't call 911 for help, I'll call Wolf Blitzer.

Or are you just campaigning? If so give it a rest, you are already seeded high.

JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 131 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 10:59 PM
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 12,934
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyholly View Post
The media protects lives? And only white people? WOW. Good to know. If I get in trouble I won't call 911 for help, I'll call Wolf Blitzer.

Or are you just campaigning? If so give it a rest, you are already seeded high.
of course they do. the media has the mission to portray reality but what we often see is that it creates realities by excessive coverage of isolated incidents, by delegitimation of social movements, by distortion of facts and also by exposing flat out lies.

the more coverage something receives, the more chances are that the favoured end will be protected by the government. that's how it is and that's how it will keep going on.

As for the ACC, make of it what you want. I've been saying the same things since the moment i got here, a time in which the ACC wasn't a popularity contest, mind you.

abraxas21 is offline  
post #18 of 131 (permalink) Old 11-17-2012, 11:59 PM
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 15,542
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

I have no idea what you are talking about, but if the media protects lives, then I am all in favour of that.

JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline  
post #19 of 131 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 12:07 AM
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 15,542
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
what we often see is that it creates realities by excessive coverage of isolated incidents, .
Yes, I think you said that the media should not be giving time to things like honour killings in the Muslim world. You think that anything that makes someone other than the West look bad should not be aired. Which really means you want the media to be biased - but on your terms.

BTW, the trial in Canada of an Afghan immigrant, his wife and his son for murdering his three daughters and his other wife has finally ended. All three were put away for life. The daughters spoke to boys at school, so had to be put down like rats. The older wife was just thrown in the lake as well, why not, she was a little long in the tooth. I remember during the trial you argued that this would be typical of the western media, to report stuff like this.

But you are right in a way, in the Middle East, this would be non-news.

JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline  
post #20 of 131 (permalink) Old 11-18-2012, 06:40 AM
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 12,934
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyholly View Post
Yes, I think you said that the media should not be giving time to things like honour killings in the Muslim world. You think that anything that makes someone other than the West look bad should not be aired. Which really means you want the media to be biased - but on your terms.
uhh, no. the point is that the mass western media deliberately picks stories like that in order to make the other side look bad.

btw, here's an interesting article of the partiality of the BBC when reporting the israeli palestinian conflict:

Quote:
In 2006, an independent panel of senior public figures published a report assessing the impartiality of the BBC’s coverage of the “Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

The panel, chaired by Sir Quentin Thomas, a senior figure in the British Home Office, found “identifiable shortcomings, particularly in respect of gaps in coverage, analysis, context and perspective and in the consistent maintenance of the BBC’s own editorial standards.”

The Thomas Report, as it became known, was quickly shoved under the carpet by the BBC, even though it had originally been commissioned by the corporation’s own governors, and business continued as usual (“Report of the Independent Panel for the BBC Governors on Impartiality of BBC Coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict,” April 2006, available on the Internet Archive).

In the last few days, the shortcomings highlighted in the report have never seemed so glaring.

keep reading here: http://electronicintifada.net/conten...ts-truth/11894
and of course, the BBC is just one major news outlet that misrepresents reality to favour special interests. Examples are many. Owners few.

abraxas21 is offline  
post #21 of 131 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 04:35 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,501
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Perhaps in light of todays bombings discussion on this issue of media coverage could continue in this thread out of respect for the Boston victims.

"I did not play my best tennis, no? And..that is what enable him to win..to win this match no? "

- Rafael Nadal, ever so "humble", - press conference after shock 4 set loss to Robeen Soderling @ 2009 French Open 4th round.


Proud member of the Anti Dull Alliance
2003 is offline  
post #22 of 131 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 02:46 PM
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 12,934
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

good bump.

3 westerners die in boston and everyone is acting as if the world is gonna end. at least there's no bush around or another middle eastern nation would be invaded

abraxas21 is offline  
post #23 of 131 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 03:05 PM
Blown Out On the Trail
 
star's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 62,739
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
good bump.

3 westerners die in boston and everyone is acting as if the world is gonna end. at least there's no bush around or another middle eastern nation would be invaded
I remember how I and so many in my country and people around the world hung for days and weeks in breathless concern and suspense when Chileans and Bolivians were trapped deep in a mine and cried tears of joy when they were rescued. Their lives were important to me and to my countrymen,.

I also know that there have been recent mine disasters in this country that you never knew or cared about, Does that make the lives of the Chilean miners more important? No, of course not. It is simply the circumstance that causes the publicity, Just as you or most anybody doesn't know about the two people found dead here in the park or the man thrown in the river. It doesn't make their lives less important.

I think you know this already. But this is an occasion where you can give vent to your feelings and you use it for those purposes. I'm not surprised anymore than I'm surprised to learn that there were expressions of glee and mirth posted on MTF after learning that people had been killed and permanently maimed in the U.S.
star is offline  
post #24 of 131 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 05:55 PM
country flag arm
Registered User
 
arm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 27,929
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Fact is media is about What people want to hear/read/watch. What is so hard to understand about that? Some examples were given here, like the Myanmar disaster, well truth is a lot of people living in Europe, the US and the so called "western countries" don't even know Myanmar is a country! Is the ignorance sad to witness? Yes, but there is no way around it.

Does the media think westerners lives are more valuable? Of course not! Believing that takes even greater ignorance...
arm is offline  
post #25 of 131 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 06:04 PM
Rankings Master
 
Slasher1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Age: 30
Posts: 12,866
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

[IRONY]
I think this is getting more coverage than Breivik. There are school shootings with many more victims that get less coverage. The Western media is biased against Western media.
[/IRONY]

Seriously now, the minute the press will be safe in countries like Iraq, Angola, Syria or Afghanistan, they will account for the atrocities that are surely taking place there. The impact of events is always greater in places where people think it's safe. If tomorrow morning, Notre Dame of Paris is bombed, it would count more than Afghanistan. Yes, of course it's unfair, but that's the way our "modern" society works. Never to build, always to destroy, no matter who we talk about as "The Destroyer". When people start dying in safe places, people always wonder "Where is safe? Where can we live in peace?"
Slasher1985 is online now  
post #26 of 131 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 06:19 PM
Registered User
 
Punky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: English Myple and proud
Posts: 33,475
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

"I wish that people who are conventionally supposed to love each other would say to each other, when they fight, "Please — a little less love, and a little more common decency."

Hug it out as long as it takes, people
--------------------------------------------
"People were created to be loved
things were created to be used.
The reason why the world is in chaos is because things are being loved, and people are being used."

"יברכך ה' וישמרך,יאר ה' פניו אליך ויחונך,ישא ה' פניו אליך וישם לך שלום"
Punky is offline  
post #27 of 131 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 06:20 PM
Registered User
 
Castafiore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,954
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slasher1985 View Post
Seriously now, the minute the press will be safe in countries like Iraq, Angola, Syria or Afghanistan, they will account for the atrocities that are surely taking place there.
I don't think it's got to do with safety in those countries.
If you look for it, you can find good news reports from those "unsafe" countries. Those news reports are there, they just don't get as much attention.

I think it's more habit and what people get used to seeing. People are used to hearing about Afghanistan, Syria, etc. So, the impact of such news items is not as big as the impact of 2 explosions during a marathon which isn't exactly an expected event, unlike attacks in Syria for example.
Castafiore is offline  
post #28 of 131 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 06:22 PM
Rankings Master
 
Slasher1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Age: 30
Posts: 12,866
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Castafiore View Post
I think it's more habit and what people get used to seeing. People are used to hearing about Afghanistan, Syria, etc. So, the impact of such news items are not as big as the impact of 2 explosions during a marathon in a "safe" area in the world.
I think it's more related to what I said in the second part of my post, which you didn't quote. It's the impact of "acts of terrorism in places deemed safe" that gets the maximum attention.
Slasher1985 is online now  
post #29 of 131 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 06:25 PM
Registered User
 
Castafiore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,954
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slasher1985 View Post
I think it's more related to what I said in the second part of my post, which you didn't quote. It's the impact of "acts of terrorism in places deemed safe" that gets the maximum attention.
It's not totally the case either IMO.

I mean, take 9/11 and then think about the terrorist attacks in Madrid and in London. Two safe areas when it happened. I wonder how many people could place a date on the attacks in Madrid and London without cheating (looking it up). 9/11 got the brunt of the attention in news reports, documentaries, movies,... (and still does).

Last edited by Castafiore; 04-16-2013 at 06:29 PM.
Castafiore is offline  
post #30 of 131 (permalink) Old 04-16-2013, 06:28 PM
Rankings Master
 
Slasher1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Age: 30
Posts: 12,866
                     
Re: Are Western "first world country" lives seen as more valuable by the media?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Castafiore View Post
I mean, take 9/11 and then think about the terrorist attacks in Madrid and in London. Two safe areas. I wonder how many people could place a date on the attacks in Madrid and London without cheating (looking it up). 9/11 got the brunt of the attention in news reports, documentaries, movies,...
It's on a totally different scale. 9/11 caused so many victims compared to Madrid and London. There is no terrorist attack with the impact 9/11 had. Check the list:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...rorist_attacks
Slasher1985 is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome