if it was just a funny comment then the troll responses would have been deleted and your post kept, but that post begged for comments on it due to it's nature, I have nothing personal against you that's why I didn't do something like that so called troll did, but your post wasn't very moderator-like and that's why it was deleted.
You started a thread
Title: why is there no consistency regarding "Banned Users" thread?
there are many users who have been banned for long times and haven't been added to the thread (e.g. groundstroke, LinkMage, Kuhne among others) and many others who have been perma-banned and haven't been added to the perma-banned users (e.g. kingfederer, modern tennis etc), I don't think it's fair and transparent that some posters' banning reasons are exposed and known to all and some are left unmentioned, either mention them all or don't keep a "banned users" thread, or am I wrong?
with a valid question
My reply to your first post was (I think there's no problem bringing this deleted post):
Why are you making so many questions, habibko? Do you want your name in that list?
before Carlita answered to your question.
The answer by a troll was:
Mod intimidating and threatening a poster. It seems asking questions is also a bannable offense in the Newli Invented Book of Rules.
Now you can see it under your sensitiveness.
so what if people had different levels of sensitivities, just because one or two people in each case thought the video was inappropriate we have to disregard the opinion of everyone else? why should ultra-sensitive people be the judge of what is appropriate and what is not?
I'm sorry if the moderation seems ultra-sensitive, but can't help you.