I've a crucial question about your favourite tennis player and I think it's really a hard matter to decide.
Think thoroughly about it and then tell me if or if not and argue why or why not Roger will ever succeed in winning Roland Garros.
Is he versatile enough to dominate his opponents on clay, too?
Or are his qualities restricted to grass and hard courts just like Sampras' were?
Will he end up like "Pistol Pete" winning Wimbledon more than half a dozen of times but never being successful in Paris?
And is he able to beat Nadal on clay?
I think everybody is just focusing on Wimbledon right now, especially now that our man is in the final
I will answer this by tomorrow(ok not if I feel crappy tomorrow if you know what I mean). C'mon ROGI!!!!!
BTW there is already a thread about this in the GM for your reading pleasure.
Maybe in 2006 or 2007 0r 2008 or ........ He has until the last year of his career to win it.
~~~Roger Federer (18 GS): Wimbledon 2003, AO 2004, Wimbledon 2004, US Open 2004, Wimbledon 2005, US Open 2005, AO 2006, Wimbledon 2006, US Open 2006, AO 2007, Wimbledon 2007, US Open 2007, US Open 2008, Roland Garros 2009, Wimbledon 2009, AO 2010, Wimbledon 2012, AO 2017 ~~~