Yes GWH, for those who're able to be fair and objective, feel free to critisize as they want, but 90% others in MTF who's almost always doing the same when come to their favourites, better shut the fxxk up and stop thinking they have the right to do so or think they're better than few Fed freaks
As for the question on this thread, it's the latest trend in MTF.
People will always try to find fault in the top player, not to mention one who had been so dominating. The thing is for Rogi, he doesn't do much controversial stuff for others to bash both on and off court, so I almost feel like picking on the no. of threads with his name of it in GM was one of the pathetic way of getting around with bashing him "fairly" so as to release their frustratiosn of him winning too much
Otherwise, read and analysie every sinlge line of what he said and jump on it each time he said anything's that's on boarder of confident and arrogant, than make a big fuss over it.
Else it's hard for me to see why Federer's discussion/threads or Fed "freaks" are the only one that's polluting GM (LMAO, and we're talking about GM here, the one where for year I read about who's more sexy, who have better legs etc daily). As many of you had pointed out, funny thing is most of those threads created in GM weren't even from his fans
Starting threads about "boring" Federer discussion
Starting threads just to complain about the above thread coz it killed the variety of tennis discussion?
Which is more redundant?
make posts congratulating on Rogi's "obvious" wins
make posts complaining/whining on the redundant congratulations instead of just ignoring those posts and let the thread die?
which is more irritating?
My pick is ALL of them are, so it doesnt' give one the right to critisize the other or think they are better