You said you think people who would pay to watch exhibitions are coz they want to see the tennis star/celebrity and not the tennis. I would pay to watch exhibitions, and that makes me and many fans fall under that according to your analysis that's where I have problem with your generalisations and responded.
it seems to me you dont understand that i didnt use generalizations.
go read my post and you will see i said "i understand SOME
posters would want to pay $$ etc..."
i just repeated the verbage you use when you said "THE MAN" and applied to "SOME
" fans...haha...really what does that mean?
Now who's getting all worked up?
I only have problem with your generalisations in this particular case which I rather judgemental hence my response. I don't have a problem with you as a poster as I'd seen many reasonable posts throughout the years. Just so you know.
im not accusing people of being judgemental or saying that i will leave the forum like some other posters(not necc you). i've had to repeat things many times because it doesnt seem to be clear for some people.
i never had a problem with some in this forum who want to watch federer in these exhibitions, and stated so.
i even clarified my definition of "fans" to you, and you still come with BS as if i meant everyone who is a fan of roger's tennis is a "fan".
im sorry you have a problem with my post even though i clearly used appropriate minimizers. you just seem to have done selective reading in that post.
if it makes you happy, go ahead and think that i am judgemental. I won't do the same though. I like to judge a post, and not a poster
im sorry for my rant. It's hard to engage in discussion when i feel like im being misunderstood. So i have had to keep repeating what was obivous to me.