Frankly, I don't quite like any of the odds today, but I bet on all four markets to keep my streak alive. Fourth consecutive day of betting on all the markets present. I have bet on all markets, except a total of 5 in the first two days, in MC.
R. Gasquet vs. F. Fognini:
Tough match to call. Fognini has been playing well, but yet the odds are quite long on him. So, he should be the natural pick. But, I get swayed because Richie is my favourite player. The h2h is also very telling with Fog wining just 4 games in 4 sets. 1000 on Richie.
S. Wawrinka vs. J-W. Tsonga:
Another tough one. Tsonga has been playing surprisingly well, considering it is clay. But then Wawa has been as well. As long as he does not have a lull after the high, I think Stan should win this. I hate it when the bookmakers realize that the higher ranked player is not necessarily always the favourite. Why can't they be more stupid? 200 on Stan
N. Djokovic vs. J. Nieminen:
With Nole's ankle and Jarrko's form, anything is possible. 50 on Nieminen.
R.Nadal vs. G.Dimitrov:
5 year birth year prophecy anyone? Wanted to keep the streak alive. 80 on Grisha.
If he wins, I win 1440. To get that amount on Nadal, I need to bet 36K on Nadal which is a lot more than I have.
Have a sizeable profit on 2255 in MC, so can afford the risky 1000 bet on Richie.
Thank you for your analysis
I think I'll bet 2k on Wawrinka like I said before and maybe some money on Djokovic. It's temptimg to go all in on Rafa though
As Litotes said, risk is too high. I used to all in way too often when I started vBetting about 6-7 months ago. Lost it all more times than I care to remember. Been betting seriously since IW, although I did go in all in during DC and lose. But, now only serious betting. I agree that high risk also has high reward, but for me, there is not fun in going all in. Betting over a spread is much more interesting, IMO.