Why didn't Roy Emerson turn professional? - MensTennisForums.com
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old 10-18-2010, 04:46 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1
Why didn't Roy Emerson turn professional?

Why didn't Roy Emerson turn professional?
They were discussing tennis on the radio the other day. They were comparing Federer and Nadal with the all-time greats. Someone said you cannot compare Emerson's record or Laver's grand slam record to Federer or Nadal. Because Laver went 6 years where he could not contest the Grand slams and Emerson won most of his because he stayed an amateur and not competing with Laver.
So why didn't Roy Emerson turn professional? Not enough money? Other reasons?

I didn't get where I am today selling ice creams tasting of bookends, pumice stone, and West Germany.
Blueslipper is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old 10-18-2010, 08:39 PM
Registered User
Echoes's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2009
Age: 34
Posts: 1,902
Re: Why didn't Roy Emerson turn professional?

Emerson was a "false amateur".

He got "allowance" (officially) from the LTAA but, as a matter of fact, he could make a decent living out of his 'amateur' (sic) career and travel all around the World (the ITF tried to prevent it with stupid rules like the 210 days abroad). The LTAA wanted to keep their best players for the Davis Cup, by 1963. I guess Laver's turning pro was a wake-up call. The same happened in Spain. The Spanish fed had to leave Gimeno in 1962 but managed to keep Santana in 1963. The likes of Pietrangeli, Stolle and probably also Fraser were other so-called 'false amateurs'.
Echoes is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old 12-25-2010, 06:22 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 54
Re: Why didn't Roy Emerson turn professional?

Roy did turn pro in 1968 but he got roughed up by the likes of Laver, Gonzales, Roswell, and the gang. But he did reach the Quarters of the French in 1968, the Quarters of the U.S. Open in 1969, and Wimbledon in 1970. He was more of a 4th rounder in slams in singles but he still won titles with Rod Laver in doubles.

But I do think he could have won some Grand Slam titles due to his athleticism if they allowed pros in 1960. But by 1968, he got old and the pros came.
trivfun is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome