Most Prestigious slam - Page 3 - MensTennisForums.com
View Poll Results: Which slam is most prestigious?
Australian Open 5 1.98%
French Open 30 11.90%
Wimbledon 185 73.41%
US Open 11 4.37%
All are equal 21 8.33%
Voters: 252. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 12:21 PM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,507
                     
Re: Most Prestigious slam

It can be a bit difficult with the initial ballot, but for the players it's very organised.

Though the AO ticket policy is easily the most logical, and I was very lucky that I had connections to get me FO tickets.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 02:07 PM
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
Re: Re: Most Prestigious slam

Quote:
Originally Posted by WyveN
isn't getting tickets to the FO really nasty?

In Australia all you do is show up on the day
I've never had any problems getting tickets for the US Open either. I bought ahead of time, but only like, two days ahead of time

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
post #33 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 03:41 PM
Registered User
 
Angelito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Age: 37
Posts: 240
                     
Re: Re: Re: Most Prestigious slam

Quote:
Originally Posted by WyveN
umm US Open is older then the French Open
History is not only made of years but also of actions, events, culture, etc. So, if almost everyone here think that Roland Garros has actually more history than the US Open I guess it's because they share my conception about history.

That's why I said RG and Wimbledon have more history than the others, not because how old they are.
Angelito is offline  
post #34 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 10:15 PM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,957
                     
Re: Re: Re: Re: Most Prestigious slam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelito
History is not only made of years but also of actions, events, culture, etc. So, if almost everyone here think that Roland Garros has actually more history than the US Open I guess it's because they share my conception about history.

That's why I said RG and Wimbledon have more history than the others, not because how old they are.
in what way does it have more history, just interested?

if all slams are equal in prestige, and FO is equal to Wimbledon, why is the FO website lying?
WyveN is offline  
post #35 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 10:58 PM
Registered User
 
Angelito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Age: 37
Posts: 240
                     
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Most Prestigious slam

Quote:
Originally Posted by WyveN
in what way does it have more history, just interested?

if all slams are equal in prestige, and FO is equal to Wimbledon, why is the FO website lying?
I guess you should ask that to FO website webmaster, not me.
And because the FO site is saying that doesn't mean is the absolute and only truth.

Anyway I'm not trying convince anyone I'm just giving my opinion, that's all.

I don't think the subject is that interesting to argue anymore I've said it all in my first post of this thread.
Angelito is offline  
post #36 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 11:15 PM
Registered User
 
Billabong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 30
Posts: 18,737
                     
Re: Most Prestigious slam

Wimbledon!

Guga Kuerten

Roger Federer & Novak Djokovic
Billabong is offline  
post #37 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 11:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
                     
As a kid I used to love RG the most since it's what I firts watched, but now?

USO
Wimbly
FO
AO

Wimbly, objectively, has more history and prestige than USO, but I like the surface, the aesthetics, autumn in NYC, etc much more. They all count the same anyway, so who cares.
AgassiFan is offline  
post #38 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 11:26 PM
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Most Prestigious slam

Quote:
Originally Posted by WyveN
in what way does it have more history, just interested?

if all slams are equal in prestige, and FO is equal to Wimbledon, why is the FO website lying?
The US media says that the USO is the biggest tourament of the year, and that everybody who is anybody wants it more than anything.

Just because something is "widey regarded" as something, does not mean that everybody feels that way, nor does it mean that it's entirely true.

You'll notice that this is what the FO site... it did not say "Wimbledon is the biggest slam in the world, the most prestigious." It said that it was widely considered to be. There is a distinction here, that most readers of the English language should be able to make.

That said, I'm sure there are tons of guys who want to win Wimbledon the most. Overall, if you did a poll, I will assume that those guys would win out. It's just not the case for everybody. That is, and always has been my arguement on this one.

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
post #39 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 11:28 PM
Registered User
 
Chloe le Bopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,276
                     
Re: Most Prestigious slam

... that, and the fact that grass is a DEAD surface, takes away from the "prestige" that Wimbledon used to have. IMO, that tournament's "prestige" is all locked up in the days of yore. These days, it's much bigger to win RG, imo. Of course, it depends on who we're talking about. I highly doubt that Hewitt would turn in his Wimbledon for RG... much like I doubt Juan Caros would do the same. I'll never be convinced that one of those is worth more than the other.

I lack direction.

Chocking makes me sad.
Chloe le Bopper is offline  
post #40 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 11:30 PM
Registered User
 
Kiara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,857
                     
Re: Most Prestigious slam

Wimbledon to me because Im english it's an English tradition ..and in England *most* non-tennis fans will know who the Wimbledon champion is whereas they may not necessarily know won the USO.

Although did anyone catch the show where Graham Norton had Johnny Mac as a guest and he went to him "that guy who won wimbledon, he just fell out of the sky didnt he...?" I was so embaressed and JMac just smiled.
Kiara is offline  
post #41 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-20-2004, 11:57 PM
Registered User
 
Kiara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,857
                     
Just because grass an obsolete surface doesnt take away from the tradition and dignity and prestiege associated with Wimbledon.Im not sure if it's "the slam to win" but it's still a great tournament regardless of the surface,the fact that tennis is only played on grass for three weeks in a year is what makes grass court tennis so beautiful and special and in my eyes it hasnt lost it's status. However it will if do it ever switches to a synthetic surface and I sincerely hope it doesnt!

I have no idea which slam the players consider to be the most prestigious, it depends on the player, for someone like Roddick it's likely to be his home slam, for many european players it's Roland Garros but from a fan standpoint my pick is Wimbledon.

Last edited by Kiara; 03-21-2004 at 12:26 AM.
Kiara is offline  
post #42 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-21-2004, 12:03 AM
Registered User
 
RoddickPride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In Andrei Pavel's pants~I wish!
Age: 28
Posts: 72
                     
Wimbledon!!!!!!!!

Karma Will Get The Belgian Bitch!

Henin-Hardenne sucks!

Congrats Alicia Molik on your Bronze medal, and Mardy Fish, on your Silver Medal!!!!

Good Luck: Safin, Fish, Roddick, Pavel, Ferrero, Molik, Capriati, Mandula, and Sharapova!!!!!
RoddickPride is offline  
post #43 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-21-2004, 12:25 AM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,957
                     
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Most Prestigious slam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Rebecca
The US media says that the USO is the biggest tourament of the year, and that everybody who is anybody wants it more than anything.
That is just ego/advertising. Obvious difference is that this was on the FO website, if it was on the Wimbledon official site I wouldn't take notice.

Quote:
Just because something is "widey regarded" as something, does not mean that everybody feels that way, nor does it mean that it's entirely true.
The claim I am making, which is backed by the FO web site, is that W is "widely recognized" as most prestigious, not that every single person/fan/player in tennis concurs. (as this forum proves)
WyveN is offline  
post #44 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-21-2004, 12:26 AM Thread Starter
Banned!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,957
                     
Re: Re: Most Prestigious slam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen Rebecca
... that, and the fact that grass is a DEAD surface, takes away from the "prestige" that Wimbledon used to have. IMO, that tournament's "prestige" is all locked up in the days of yore. These days, it's much bigger to win RG, imo.
Surface doesn't affect prestige (certainly not if your deciding between grass and clay) and if anything, the fact that it is virtually the only tournament on grass makes it more special
WyveN is offline  
post #45 of 283 (permalink) Old 03-21-2004, 12:47 AM
Registered User
 
PinkFeatherBoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wherever I lay my hat...
Posts: 6,304
                     
Re: Most Prestigious slam

I'd say
Wimbledon
FO
USO
AO
PinkFeatherBoa is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome