2003 Rome final Felix Mantilla Roger Federer - MensTennisForums.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 (permalink) Old 03-18-2004, 06:01 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
joeb_uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,653
                     
2003 Rome final Felix Mantilla Roger Federer

hi guys, i missed this match from least year. just wondering if this was a good match?
joeb_uk is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 (permalink) Old 03-19-2004, 02:47 AM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,507
                     
This is a loaded question for a few reasons? One, what is your definition of a good match, that is different for all the people who watch tennis.

If you are a Mantilla fan it was a good match, if you are Federer fan then it wasn't so good. I am a fan of them both, and I enjoyed the result as to whether it was a good match see my previous sentence.

Ok, seriously Mantilla played very well he was like at his old form before the shoulder problem he was running and running, the backhand wasn't missing and he wasn't making hardly any unforced errors.

Federer had break chances but he failed to convert them and Felix got more confidence and Roger got frustrated and wasn't patient enough during the long rallies to wait for his chances, instead he was trying to finish the points too quickly and mentally Roger wasn't there.

Felix deserved to win this tournament and he played outstanding in the final, it's probably the only TMS he will win as Federer has more many chances to win TMS events.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #3 of 5 (permalink) Old 03-19-2004, 04:19 AM
Registered User
 
Dirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,934
                     
I wasn't happy with the result but Felix did beat a lot of big guys to win it. I just hope Roger can get his hands on Felix this clay season.
Dirk is offline  
post #4 of 5 (permalink) Old 03-19-2004, 06:15 AM
Registered User
 
Fedex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 17,533
                     
Re: 2003 Rome final Felix Mantilla Roger Federer

Felix deserved the match, no denying it. Rogi wasted his chances and he payed for it. Ah, it reminds me though the clay season is fast approaching, be warned Andy. He had better hope he can win Indian Wells or Miami. Of course i dont expect Rogi to be spectacular on the surface either. He plays an attacking, aggressive game, not suited to clay.

"I think that now and until the end of my career, I can really play with my mind at peace, and no longer hear that I've never won Roland Garros." - Roger Federer
Fedex is offline  
post #5 of 5 (permalink) Old 03-19-2004, 06:21 AM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,507
                     
Re: 2003 Rome final Felix Mantilla Roger Federer

Fedex, actually Roger is quite comfortable on clay and will more than likely win a tournament on the surface this season.

He knows how to move effectively on clay unlike many of the fast court players or Hewitt. He is more vulnerable simply because while his defensive skills have improved and will continue, he hasn't always shown the patience to grind out results which will be needed when he is on the clay.

Have you forgotten his only TMS victory was in Hamburg, he made the final of Rome. His first Slam QF was at the FO, this is not bad for someones weakest surface.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome