I'm one of those tennis fans who don't oppose the idead of Big 4. I actually embrace it.
Yes, Murray may not be on the same level career wise as Nadal, Djokovic, Federer but he was more than capable of challenging them all, winning some GS finals, Masters finals. Also Murray is a former #1, two times olympic champion, he has 11 GS finals and 21 masters finals, WTF title.
He's head and shoulder above anyone bar Nadal, Federer, Djokovic. He deserves to me mentioned among these legends.
The term Big 4 refers to the four most dominant players of the last decade. Murray is one of them. Wawrinka is nowhere near Murray. I don't see the problem.
nobody is talking about wawrinka, it is about murray beeing mention with the other 3. and i do understand why people are not too happy about it. murray is lightyears below them. it is another dimension of tennis.
big 3 it is. olympic medals, wooooooow.