Another Federer record - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 06:38 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 38
Posts: 14
                     
Another Federer record

Federer could break Connor's record for consecutive weeks as no. 1 if
he manage to retain his position until 5 weeks after the Aussie open
next year. Assuming Fed retain his No. 1 until next year's AO, he will
be the world no 1 for 156 consecutive weeks. For each and every one of
this week, he is the holder of the majority of the slam, making him the
undisputed world no 1, unlike Connors, who could still be no. 1 without
holding a single slam.

Starting from week following: Until the last week of: # of weeks Holder
of Winner of the remaining slam
Aussie 04 French 04 18 AO, W Roddick, Ferrero
French 04 Wimby 04 4 AO, W Gaudio, Roddick
Wimby 04 USO 04 10 AO, W Gaudio, Roddick
USO 04 Aussie 05 20 AO, W, USO Gaudio
Aussie 05 French 05 18 W, USO Safin, Gaudio
French 05 Wimby 05 4 W, USO Nadal, Safin
Wimby 05 USO 05 10 W, USO Nadal, Safin
USO 05 Aussie 06 20 W, USO Nadal, Safin
Aussie 06 French 06 19 W, USO, AO Nadal
French 06 Wimby 06 4 W, USO, AO Nadal
Wimby 06 USO 06 9 W, USO, AO Nadal
USO 06 Aussie 07 20 W, USO, AO Nadal
Total 156

Of course this streak will end should Nadal win next year's AO.
susuteko is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 09:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 158
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Am I the only one confused by this?

And exactly what streak will be ending IF Nadal were to win the AO?
senorgato is offline  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 09:34 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 38
Posts: 14
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Quote:
Originally Posted by senorgato View Post
Am I the only one confused by this?

And exactly what streak will be ending IF Nadal were to win the AO?
If Nadal wins AO06, then the period of 52 weeks prior to that in which the ranking is based will have Nadal as the RG and AO champion, and Federer as the W and USO champion. Then Fed will no more holds the majority of the slams because there's another equally dominant player in slams (of course I' referring to only slam wins here, nobody remembers the finalist, semi-finalists etc). That's why the streak will be ended.
susuteko is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 09:53 AM
Ace Loveforty
 
scarecrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tirana, ALBANIA
Posts: 81,099
                     
Re: Another Federer record

all I can say about this statistics is


http://www.menstennisforums.com/show...&postcount=378

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormerRafaFan View Post
That will be the last victory of Rafa for quite some time.. With his joke mentality and pathetic game, I hope the disgusting player loses every single match next season. He's disgraceful. He should just retire. He's a joke.
Quote:
Originally Posted by l_mac View Post
(10) Corey Feldman vs. (12) scarecrows
scarecrows is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 10:03 AM
Registered User
 
RogersGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 29
Posts: 130
                     
Re: Another Federer record

well what about after RG 05? Rafa had just won it, and Marat won at Melbourne that year, so Roger was the defending champ for 2 grand slams then too-- Wimby and USO, and thats 50% of the slams. I'm not sure how strong a statement you're making here

*Federer*Safin*Baghdatis*Nadal*Guga*Blake*



If God wanted us to bend over, he'd put diamonds on the floor. -Joan Rivers
RogersGirl is offline  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 10:12 AM
Ace Loveforty
 
scarecrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tirana, ALBANIA
Posts: 81,099
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogersGirl View Post
well what about after RG 05? Rafa had just won it, and Marat won at Melbourne that year, so Roger was the defending champ for 2 grand slams then too-- Wimby and USO, and thats 50% of the slams. I'm not sure how strong a statement you're making here
ok, the first post of the thread is rather confusing but this is not that difficult to understand

he said majority, so after RG2005, Roger had 2, marat 1 and Rafa 1 so Fed had the majority

http://www.menstennisforums.com/show...&postcount=378

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormerRafaFan View Post
That will be the last victory of Rafa for quite some time.. With his joke mentality and pathetic game, I hope the disgusting player loses every single match next season. He's disgraceful. He should just retire. He's a joke.
Quote:
Originally Posted by l_mac View Post
(10) Corey Feldman vs. (12) scarecrows
scarecrows is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 10:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 158
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Well, it makes sense now. I thought the streak he was referring to was Roger's consecutive weeks at #1.
senorgato is offline  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 10:22 AM
Registered User
 
RogersGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 29
Posts: 130
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Quote:
Originally Posted by scarecrows View Post
ok, the first post of the thread is rather confusing but this is not that difficult to understand

he said majority, so after RG2005, Roger had 2, marat 1 and Rafa 1 so Fed had the majority
lol right... you'll have to forgive me its 5am and i cant sleep

*Federer*Safin*Baghdatis*Nadal*Guga*Blake*



If God wanted us to bend over, he'd put diamonds on the floor. -Joan Rivers
RogersGirl is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 07:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,339
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Quote:
Originally Posted by susuteko View Post
If Nadal wins AO06, then the period of 52 weeks prior to that in which the ranking is based will have Nadal as the RG and AO champion, and Federer as the W and USO champion. Then Fed will no more holds the majority of the slams because there's another equally dominant player in slams (of course I' referring to only slam wins here, nobody remembers the finalist, semi-finalists etc). That's why the streak will be ended.
dude you're not making sense. you can subtract 1000pts from fed and add 1000pts to rafa and fed would still be number 1
megadeth is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 07:24 PM
Registered User
 
PamV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,671
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Quote:
Originally Posted by susuteko View Post
Starting from week following: Until the last week of: # of weeks Holder
of Winner of the remaining slam
Aussie 04 French 04 18 AO, W Roddick, Ferrero
French 04 Wimby 04 4 AO, W Gaudio, Roddick
Wimby 04 USO 04 10 AO, W Gaudio, Roddick
USO 04 Aussie 05 20 AO, W, USO Gaudio
Aussie 05 French 05 18 W, USO Safin, Gaudio
French 05 Wimby 05 4 W, USO Nadal, Safin
Wimby 05 USO 05 10 W, USO Nadal, Safin
USO 05 Aussie 06 20 W, USO Nadal, Safin
Aussie 06 French 06 19 W, USO, AO Nadal
French 06 Wimby 06 4 W, USO, AO Nadal
Wimby 06 USO 06 9 W, USO, AO Nadal
USO 06 Aussie 07 20 W, USO, AO Nadal
Total 156
I don't follow what this list is saying. It doesn't make sense.

Roger Forever !
PamV is offline  
post #11 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 07:31 PM
Registered User
 
PamV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,671
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Quote:
Originally Posted by megadeth View Post
dude you're not making sense. you can subtract 1000pts from fed and add 1000pts to rafa and fed would still be number 1
I don't think he's saying Nadal would be #1. He is just looking at a record that no one else has talked about. That of being holder of record number of weeks as #1 plus being the current holder of the majority of the major titles of the given year. (For sample right now Roger is the holder of 3 major titles...meaning the majority). If Nadal were to win AO then each Roger and Nadal would be the holders of 2 major titles after AO is finished.


I just don't understand what that tally list of majors for each year was supposed to mean because he wasn't listing the acutal winner of the title. He never listed Roger. I think he's not explaining something.

Roger Forever !
PamV is offline  
post #12 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-09-2006, 07:44 PM
Registered User
 
kokket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 91
                     
Re: Another Federer record

this only happen if roger doesn't play AO and Nadal wins AO - i think
kokket is offline  
post #13 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-10-2006, 01:51 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 38
Posts: 14
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Quote:
Originally Posted by megadeth View Post
dude you're not making sense. you can subtract 1000pts from fed and add 1000pts to rafa and fed would still be number 1
All I'm saying is at each and every week Roger hold the world no. 1 position, he is also the majority holder of the slam, hence not only he is the world no 1 by ATP points, but also the no 1 for the slam purist. Remember how people raise up the issue of Vilas being the real no 1 because he won more majors than Connors in that particular year. None of this can be said about Roger's until next year's AO.
susuteko is offline  
post #14 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-10-2006, 01:52 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 38
Posts: 14
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Quote:
Originally Posted by PamV View Post
I don't think he's saying Nadal would be #1. He is just looking at a record that no one else has talked about. That of being holder of record number of weeks as #1 plus being the current holder of the majority of the major titles of the given year. (For sample right now Roger is the holder of 3 major titles...meaning the majority). If Nadal were to win AO then each Roger and Nadal would be the holders of 2 major titles after AO is finished.


I just don't understand what that tally list of majors for each year was supposed to mean because he wasn't listing the acutal winner of the title. He never listed Roger. I think he's not explaining something.
Sorry about the table, don't know how to align them to make it look nicer and not so confusing.
susuteko is offline  
post #15 of 22 (permalink) Old 11-10-2006, 01:54 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 38
Posts: 14
                     
Re: Another Federer record

Quote:
Originally Posted by kokket View Post
this only happen if roger doesn't play AO and Nadal wins AO - i think
No, whether Rpger play it or not, if Nadal wins it, they both would have 2 slams each, and to the slam purist, we dont have any player dominating.
susuteko is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome