The Age of No Competition (2002-2006) - MensTennisForums.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 06:51 PM Thread Starter
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Age: 40
Posts: 23,189
                     
The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

October 25th, 2006

The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

by Sean Randall

In a post few weeks ago, I basically took offense to those that hammered Pete Samprasís rightful place in history. Part of my argument was that the game back then was just as strong when Pete played as it is now.
Well, after thinking a bit more on it, reading some comments, eating a few more nachos, Iíve changed my stance. And I actually think history will ultimately look upon the current, 2002-2006 ATP years as one of the weaker periods, if not the weakest, in terms of overall competition and strength in the modern era.

Letís face it, the fact that Pete Sampras won the US Open in 2002 is quite remarkable and often overlooked. The dude could barely win a match all summer and then he somehow flipped the switched, hit the gas, and took that title. Amazing, really.

Along the way to that win he beat Rusedski, Haas, Roddick, Schalken and Agassi in his last career match. Schalken was a cup cake, but the other four wins were pretty impressive, and at that time, no one saw that Pete run coming. So how the hell did that happen. WellÖ
Just look what happened earlier in 2002. Thomas Johansson wins the Aussie, Albert Costa wins the French and we had that time capsule of a Wimbledon final between Hewitt and Nalbandian. The stage is set, anyone can win a Slam. And Pete just took what he could. Heck, Jiri Novak finished No. 7 that year!

A year later, Roddick wins the US Open and finishes the year No. 1. Thatís right, in case you forgot, Andy finished No. 1, year-end. Quite an accomplishment. So much of one that you know how many different players have finished the year No. 1 since the start of the Ranks in 1973? By my count 15. Fifteen folks, thatís it.
Roddick finished No. 1 more than Becker ever did, more than Stich ever did, more than Muster, more than Rafter, more than Kafelnikov. Even more than Safin.
He finished No. 1 one less time than Borg did. One less time than one of the bonafied all-time greats. And who knows, maybe heíll do it again?
And heís equal to Wilander, Agassi, Kuerten and Courier in the history books on that page. Thatís right, equal. Andy Roddick is in that conversation, like it or not. But is he a better player than those guys? Or, did he finish No. 1 that year because of weak-ass competition? You be the judge.

Over the next few years weíve enjoyed such improbable eyebrow-raising Slas runs like Tim Henman getting to a French semifinal, Martin Verkerk reaching the French final, Rainer Schuettler advancing to the Australian Open final and Gaston Gaudio winning the French title.

But since Roger and Rafael hit their stride, they have quickly turned the tour into their own personal playground. But what has really changed since 2002? Roger and Rafa. Thatís really it as far as the ďstronger competitionĒ goes.
And you can still see it in the results. Two veteran serve/volley players both pulled wins yesterday over top 20 players. The 35-year-old Wayne Arthurs beat world No. 8 and Shanghai contender Tommy Robredo, and Max Mirnyi, 29, beats Dmitry Tursunov. And today Tommy Haas needs three sets to beat a doubles specialist in Nenad Zimonjic.

Seriously, if you are going to make the argument that tennis is so much stronger now than say 10 years ago, and guys back then wouldnít be able to compete now, then how the hell do those results happen?? I mean Nenad is 30 and heís a doubles specialist. And Wayne Arthurs was strongly considering retiring what, like three years ago (maybe he did?).

And hereís a good one. Remember Dick Norman. The big guy turns 36 next March. Guess when he reached his highest career singles ranking? Just guess?? How about this week. Thatís right, big Dick hit No. 90 this past Monday, a new career high for the Belgian. Well done.
Maybe all this guys really are peaking or in their prime. Or maybe not.
What also troubles me is that so many current players in the game today lack belief in big matches, be it at Slams or D-Cup or even late in a Masters tournament.

Just ask yourself, how many big matches has Nalbandian ever won? Robredo? Davydenko? Haas? Blake? Ljubicic (he came through in D-Cup, but little else since)? Gonzalez? Ancic? Stepanek? And on and on. Collectively, aside from Roddick/Safin/Hewitt, itís very few. And itís not just about beating Roger and Rafa, itís about beating the lesser players in big moments.

I really think Andre Agassi kept playing as long as he did because he saw that the level of competition outside of Roger wasnít very strong. He also knew that most players nowadays play the same strategy: hit it hard, if that doesnít work hit it harder, and if that doesnít work go to the gym more. (From my playing experience, Iíve always found it easier to return harder ground strokes than the groundies with lesser pace. But maybe thatís just me!)
And it almost paid off for Andre. At age 35, playing well past his prime and as the older Slam finalist in 31 years, he still reached the US Open final last year and gave Fed a heck of a fright. Amazing.
So was Andre just that good, or was everyone else just that bad? A little of both I think. Andre probably saw the draw and said okay, no Roger in my section and I got a bunch of guys that crush groundies but donít really know how to win big matches. Sign me up. Pete did it a few years earlier, and if Roger gets upset, maybe I can get a bonus US Open title.
Andre didnít get the fairy tale ending like Pete, but he sure was close.
But now with players like Gasquet, Murray, Monfils, Baghdatis, Djokovic, Del Potro, Koralev and others coming up, I think the game going forward will be played at a higher level than it has been. And thankfully some of these guys already have shown that they can close out big matches.

Murray of course is the last guy to beat Federer, and privately Iím sure heís completely baffled a guy like Roddick ever finished No. 1. Baghdatis had good crack at Federer at the Aussie final this year, and has proven he can compete on the big stage. So too has the charismatic Monfils, who his heart and mental toughness with his three consecutive five set victories in front of his home crowd at the French this year.

Monfilsí countryman Gasquet is already more accomplished than Federer ever was at age 20, and heís arguably just as talented as the Swiss. And Djokovic has an excellent chance at finishing among the Top 15 this year after winning a couple tough three setters over Gasquet and Murray just last week in Madrid.

So things really do look promising for the next few years. Letís just hope these guys pan out, because tennis is gonna need them and the Fed man really needs some legit competition.

Source: http://www.tennis-x.com/xblog/2006-10-25/104.php
Eden is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 07:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 450
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

Yeah, Koralev is a huge talent
This article is total crap, another american journalist who tries to downplay Roger's achievements, ridiculous.
Fed-Express is offline  
post #3 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 07:10 PM
Registered User
 
robinhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,271
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

If the writer changed his stance, he might as well just eat his words and stay silent.
Don't write another article so long and boring for anyone to finish.
Geez.

FEDERER 17 & Counting (fingers crossed)
SAFIN 2 and Out (T.T)


THE SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS WS CHAMPS 2010 & 2012

GIANTS SHARKS NINERS WARRIORS A'S RAIDERS
robinhood is offline  
post #4 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 07:28 PM
Senior Member
 
shotgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,570
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

Not meaning to overlook Federer's achievements or anything, but he's definitely got a point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaap View Post
The tennis equivalent of two old bald men fighting over a comb.
shotgun is offline  
post #5 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 07:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 637
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

Every sentence left me gasping in amazement that the next one would be even more moronic yet.
Ernham is offline  
post #6 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 07:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,459
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eden View Post
Over the next few years weíve enjoyed such improbable eyebrow-raising Slas runs like Tim Henman getting to a French semifinal, Martin Verkerk reaching the French final, Rainer Schuettler advancing to the Australian Open final and Gaston Gaudio winning the French title.
As opposed to '96, Sampras' prime, when MaliVai freaking Washington made the Wimbledon final.
The guy obviously didn't read hitchhiker's guide to tennis clowns.
Apemant is offline  
post #7 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 07:58 PM
Registered User
 
KaxMisha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Age: 30
Posts: 1,451
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernham View Post
Every sentence left me gasping in amazement that the next one would be even more moronic yet.
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA! Word.
KaxMisha is offline  
post #8 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 08:21 PM
When You're On The Poster
 
Johnny Groove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Age: 26
Posts: 40,913
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

I love Gael, but this guy thinks he has more talent that Federer? :retard:

Follow my Youtube Channel for all my matches
Follow me on IG for the latest news, vids, pics, and memes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novak Djokovic
Obviously, you play a lot of mind games with yourself, but it is important to always believe that you can play your best, perform your best, and in the end, your convictions are stronger than your doubts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
If I took the time to respond to every criticism that came across my desk, there would be no time for constructive work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humphrey Bogart
The only thing you owe the audience is a good performance
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niccolo Machiavelli
There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.
Johnny Groove is online now  
post #9 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 08:28 PM
Registered User
 
guga2120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,148
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

there was more comp in the mid 90's no question, but Federer is so good he would have been number 1 with young Sampras,Agassi,Rafter,Becker too.
guga2120 is offline  
post #10 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 08:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 637
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaze-2004 View Post
I love Gael, but this guy thinks he has more talent that Federer? :retard:
He's black. That's all that matters in the trashy American media. Black = charisma, if ya didnt know.
Ernham is offline  
post #11 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 08:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 755
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

It's true when people say there is no competition in this era, but there is no competition relative to Federer. Put Federer into any era and he might still be number 1, even in Sampras's era!

I don't buy the players have diminished in talent, I actually think they are more talented then ever and if the era was that weak, Sampras would have never retired when he did!
jacobhiggins is offline  
post #12 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 08:35 PM
Senior Member
 
shotgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,570
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

Quote:
Originally Posted by guga2120 View Post
there was more comp in the mid 90's no question, but Federer is so good he would have been number 1 with young Sampras,Agassi,Rafter,Becker too.
My opinion as well. I just have a hard time picturing him losing only 4 or 5 matches a year playing against Sampras, Agassi, Becker, Stich, etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaap View Post
The tennis equivalent of two old bald men fighting over a comb.
shotgun is offline  
post #13 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 08:38 PM
Registered User
 
World Beater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,922
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaze-2004 View Post
I love Gael, but this guy thinks he has more talent that Federer? :retard:
er...i think you need to read it carefully...it says monfils' countryman gasquet.
World Beater is offline  
post #14 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 08:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 462
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

There is no way Federer only loses 5 or 6 times in the Sampras era .

I think Pete himself would given him just as many defeats .

Imo , If Pete played classic serve and volley tennis with todays baseline players , he would have won 9 wimbledons . You have Jonas Bkorkman for gods sake making it to the semifinals !!
wimbledonfan is offline  
post #15 of 101 (permalink) Old 10-29-2006, 08:59 PM
Registered User
 
vincayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,927
                     
Re: The Age of No Competition (2002-2006)

He might have a point. The point (obvious) that Federer has no competition. That said, I don't think that 90s were better than now in term of overall level.

Federer would be have been as dominant in the 90s IMO. He would have lost from time to time to Sampras, and even that, I'm not that sure.

I'm not qualified enough anyway to speak about Sampras, my main souvenir are of the clay tournaments (the only ones I was watching at that time) and of a davis cup match against France where he was dispatched by an old Leconte in straight on indoor.
vincayou is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome