I think this thred is ridiculous . How many times has this been spoken about?
Yes maybe Rafa is one dimensional, but how many times has he beaten federer already this year? we all know that and have seen it. Sorry to be harsh, but I think federer's only alibi to his losses against nadal have been that he is one dimensional. Nadal maybe just that, but since federer is so great dont you think it is quite embarassing that his looses to someone he regards as low and one dimensional?
I think nadal has something that bothers roger, and roger only comforts himself by continiously saying nadal is one dimesional.
I am sick of this, if roger cant beat the one dimensional kid, how is he beating multi dimensional players? (nalbandian,haas, safin)
I guess tennis is more of a phsycological game after all.
It's not ridiculous. This needs a thread of its own for two reasons, namely that I want to hear the arguments of those who say that he isn't one-dimensional and the fact that this always comes up in other threads as an off-topic spin-off.
As for what you write about Nadal beating Federer: so what? It's completely irrelevant. No one is saying that Nadal isn't a very good player (at least I'm not). That's not what this is about, nor is it about what Roger says or why he says what he says. It's about Nadal's game and Nadals's game only.