Originally Posted by George Costanza
measuring past accomplishments, Hewitt is better than roddick? roddick might suck
, but he is still better than Hewitt today.
If they were to both retire today, absolutely, Hewitt will have had a better career than Andy. And I'm ok with that, I don't need to put Hewitt down to make Andy look better
As I said in the thread about Berdych and Andy, I have issues with simply saying "better" because that is too subjective.
So except for the fact that you happen to like Ljubicic and clearly are incapable of being objective, why do you really care so much about Roddick sucking? You have to keep saying "Roddick sucks" to pump up your guy? If you have to put other players down to pump up your own, you must not actually be all that confident in his ability to have his accomplishments stand on their own
Moreover, I didn't say you said Ljubicic would win a slam or whatever, but you make pronouncements about matches he'll win and stuff all the time; I on the other hand am the type who expects Andy to lose probably 75% of all the matches he plays
. Yet, you accused me of saying I think Andy can; I didn't. I didn't put words into your mouth, you put them into mine (twice now
Keep going, this is fun.