Quick Question about Semis TV Schedule. - MensTennisForums.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-06-2006, 05:42 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
acharlesmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 207
                     
Quick Question about Semis TV Schedule.

So im looking at the USopen site's TV schedule and it says that 12pm-6pm will be the semis. I'm assuming they're gonna show one followed by the other. Does anyone know whether it will be the top half or the bottom half first? Cause 'm busy in the morning (i'm on west coast) and i would probably miss whatever match comes first. I'm hoping top half will play 2nd or is that just not how it works?

MARAT ROGER PARADORN JAMES!


Today i break rackets, or tomorow we die
-Marat Safin
acharlesmobile is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-06-2006, 05:44 AM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,507
                     
Re: Quick Question about Semis TV Schedule.

It depends if Roddick is in the semis or not?

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #3 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-06-2006, 05:45 AM
Vamos Mandy :)
 
Deboogle!.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Looking for Andy's forehand with Sarah and Re...
Posts: 85,829
                     
Re: Quick Question about Semis TV Schedule.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeWHitler
It depends if Roddick is in the semis or not?
funny It shouldn't matter. The bottom half plays their QFs tomorrow, the top on Thursday, so the bottom half should play the first semi regardless of who is playing in the match.

LA Pics & Reports ~ My New Blog: Adventures of a Picky Foodie! ~ My Travel Blog

to (in no particular order): BryOns | Mandy | MarTy | Isner | Dent | Querrey | Baghdatis | Delic | Oli | N&o | Gasquet | Ferrero | Levine | Malisse | LUX | Melzer | Moya | Nishikori | Haas | Grosjean | Ancic | Mathieu | Calleri | Bolelli | Sela | Blake | more...
Deboogle!. is offline  
 
post #4 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-06-2006, 05:50 AM
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,507
                     
Re: Quick Question about Semis TV Schedule.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashDeb
funny It shouldn't matter. The bottom half plays their QFs tomorrow, the top on Thursday, so the bottom half should play the first semi regardless of who is playing in the match.
Who knows with the schedule in reality. It will rain today as well.

On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline  
post #5 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-06-2006, 06:06 AM
Registered User
 
DrJules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,597
                     
Re: Quick Question about Semis TV Schedule.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeWHitler
It depends if Roddick is in the semis or not?
Do you mean if Roddick is in the semi-final he will play first to give him more time before the final.

The current greatness league of active players in order of achievements to date (a factual comparison rather than fan biased assessment):

Federer 18 GS, 6 Year End Masters, 24 Master Series.
Nadal 14 GS, 28 Master Series, 1 Olympic Gold.
Djokovic 12 GS, 5 Year End Masters, 30 Master Series.


DrJules is offline  
post #6 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-06-2006, 01:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 311
                     
Re: Quick Question about Semis TV Schedule.

yeah, it will totally be based on who is playing

novak djokovic - my all time favorite!
12 GS and counting, and as always, leaving bad tastes in tracy austin's mouth

italian guys - forza azzurri, especially seppi and bolelli

new generation: impress me! looking for a new 2nd favorite

all time favorites: lleyton hewitt, juan carlos ferrero, michael chang and patrick rafter

NEVER say "i don't care who wins, i just want good tennis" you BETTER pick a side
FaceyFacem is offline  
post #7 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-06-2006, 03:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,796
                     
Re: Quick Question about Semis TV Schedule.

They will almost invariably put the match that they think will get higher tv ratings on second. Last year was a rare exception as I'm sure they gave Agassi the preferential consideration to get more recovery time. Plus, it wasn't like Fed-Hewitt didn't have some drawing power. I think a Roddick-Nadal semi would be a lock for second on the schedule, even if you had Fed-Safin on the other half.
Pigpen Stinks is offline  
post #8 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-06-2006, 07:52 PM
Registered User
 
DrJules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,597
                     
Re: Quick Question about Semis TV Schedule.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pigpen Stinks
They will almost invariably put the match that they think will get higher tv ratings on second. Last year was a rare exception as I'm sure they gave Agassi the preferential consideration to get more recovery time. Plus, it wasn't like Fed-Hewitt didn't have some drawing power. I think a Roddick-Nadal semi would be a lock for second on the schedule, even if you had Fed-Safin on the other half.

That could ruin the final if Federer in the first match beats a nobody in 3 sets e.g. Davydenko then Nadal plays a 5 set match against Roddick. Should they not give the match more likely to be longer the first slot?

The current greatness league of active players in order of achievements to date (a factual comparison rather than fan biased assessment):

Federer 18 GS, 6 Year End Masters, 24 Master Series.
Nadal 14 GS, 28 Master Series, 1 Olympic Gold.
Djokovic 12 GS, 5 Year End Masters, 30 Master Series.


DrJules is offline  
post #9 of 9 (permalink) Old 09-06-2006, 09:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,796
                     
Re: Quick Question about Semis TV Schedule.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrJules
That could ruin the final if Federer in the first match beats a nobody in 3 sets e.g. Davydenko then Nadal plays a 5 set match against Roddick. Should they not give the match more likely to be longer the first slot?
I don't know if there's any fair way to schedule it. It's a problem mostly because of the back to back semis and finals (because of tv, of course). I don't think the US players should get preferential treatment, but the system has usually worked against them in this respect. It used to be even worse when the women's final was sandwiched between the men's semis, and there was even less recovery time for the 2nd semi winner.

Over the past 25 years, CBS has practically always scheduled the match that they perceive as more ratings attractive 2nd. The exceptions would be last year, and it also looks like Agassi may have requested the early match in 2003. I think I remember them mentioning that back then, but not sure. He played Ferrero first and the Roddick-Nalby match followed. Not a big drop off there since they had the rising American star in the 2nd match.

Here's a sampling since 1980 with the perceived less attractive ratings semi listed (and played) first:

1980
Borg-Kriek
McEnroe-Connors

1981
McEnroe-Gerulaitis
Borg-Connors

1984
Lendl-Cash
McEnroe-Connors

1988
Wilander-Cahill
Lendl-Agassi

1991
Edberg-Lendl
Courier-Connors

1992
Edberg-Chang
Sampras-Courier

1993
Pioline-Masur
Sampras-Volkov

1995
Sampras-Courier
Agassi-Becker

1997
Rusedski-Bjorkman
Rafter-Chang

1998
Philippousis-Moya
Rafter-Sampras

1999
Martin-Pioline
Agassi-Kafelnikov

2000
Safin-Martin
Sampras-Hewitt

2001
Sampras-Schalken
Agassi-Hewitt

As you can see, it's typically been the American player that gets stuck in the 2nd slot.
Pigpen Stinks is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome