Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 17 (permalink) Old 09-04-2006, 03:50 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Age: 43
Posts: 2
 
Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

Just noticed her disparaging comments about how evolving racquet materials are bad for the game on usopen.org. Wrong, wrong headed, and hypocritical. Here's why. If not for better racquet technology she would not have been able to continue her tennis career, especially doubles, so long and continue to collect prize money. Last I noticed she was embracing the new bats or is she just painting her old wood racquets? Didn't evolving racquet technology finally help her prevail over Chris Evert-Lloyd to get to number one? Next, many would argue that because of more powerful racquets the game is more exciting and thus more popular, both mens and womens professional tennis tours. It has also helped to exponentially increase the prize money for both groups. As for Federer hanging on the baseline due to the newer racquet technology is also a misguided conclusion. Federer does whatever it takes and whatever he pleases to win championships. His talent reigns supreme. He already proved he can win attacking and now he will prove he can win from the baseline. Serve and volley game styles have always been less prevalent than baseliners as a whole in singles. It takes an exceptional serve and volley game to prevail over the best baseliners, e.g., Sampras, McEnroe, Edberg, Becker, all the great Aussies, Navratilova, Graff to name a few. Borg dominated the baseline on all surfaces like few others, if any, with a wood racquet. Agassi, Nadal and others dominate more because of footwork, conditioning and ball contact than racquet composition. The racquet holder not the racquet make a champion. Come on Martina, you should know that by now. I find it curious that Navratilova makes these comments on the eve of her retirement, seems like a low blow to the sport that gave her and us so much. Maybe it is time to find a new racquet, Martina. There is an adage, "only fools criticize, complain, and condemn, and most fools usually do." RFN

Last edited by Nellie; 09-04-2006 at 04:05 AM. Reason: Bold Headline
Nellie is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 (permalink) Old 09-04-2006, 03:53 AM
Registered User
 
Scotso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 33
Posts: 70,027
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

Use the enter key, please.


Le Poussin! Faithfully ignoring the haters since 1995.

Le Poulailler de Poussin! (Simontarded.)

Ron Paul for President 2012!
Scotso is offline  
post #3 of 17 (permalink) Old 09-04-2006, 03:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 249
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

I do agree with her that the racquets, strings, and slower courts have pretty much made serve and volley tennis all but extinct. When I was competing everyone served and volleyed, baseliners were the exception, now the reverse is true.
JW10S is offline  
post #4 of 17 (permalink) Old 09-04-2006, 04:08 AM
Registered User
 
BlueSwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 2,243
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

Graf certainly wasn't a serve & volleyer.
BlueSwan is offline  
post #5 of 17 (permalink) Old 09-04-2006, 04:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 616
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

That b*tch never shuts up...retire and disappear

Rafael Nadal
ServeAlready81 is offline  
post #6 of 17 (permalink) Old 09-04-2006, 05:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 799
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

Who cares what she says. She's washed out and plays doubles. She is WAY past her due.
dmit424 is offline  
post #7 of 17 (permalink) Old 09-04-2006, 07:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 526
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

New racket technology didn't help her beat Evert because whatever was available to her was available to Evert at the time of her rivalry. She surpassed Evert because she got better and Evert kind of stalled. I kind of agree with her on the racket thing, I think the game is different today because of the rackets and it would be interesting to see what the game would be like if the rackets didn't evolve so much, however, no can help the fact that the rackets evolve. She's been playing for a very long time so I think she does know what she's talking about. Just because she's opinionated doesn't mean she's wrong. I think fools like McEnroe opens his mouth and a lot of rubbish comes out all the time but no one's criticizing him cuz he's a guy. What she's saying about the rackets and Federer (I still don't know what was said, just going by your post) is not a clear right or wrong, it's simply an opinion and one that's no meant to hurt anyone.
guy in sf is offline  
post #8 of 17 (permalink) Old 09-04-2006, 09:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,459
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

Quote:
Originally Posted by JW10S
I do agree with her that the racquets, strings, and slower courts have pretty much made serve and volley tennis all but extinct. When I was competing everyone served and volleyed, baseliners were the exception, now the reverse is true.
I'm not a tennis player myself, so I'd like to ask you something. How do these things factor in? At a first glance, more powerful racquets combined with slower courts should cancel each other out. Could you try to explain in detail how each of those factors (or their combination) makes serve & volley ineffective today?
Apemant is offline  
post #9 of 17 (permalink) Old 09-04-2006, 12:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 276
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

Well basically you can say that the technique in the groundstrokes has changed alot with the modern racquets but the technique for volleys has not. The way the groundstrokes are played today wasnt possible with any kind of consistency before. And even though serves are better aswell it doesnt really help the volleyer as all it does is give you less time especially since the return is more improved than the serve with the newer racquets and the techniques they allow. The slowness of the court prevents the serve from dominating as it started to do in the 90's and to a degree makes it harder for the serve and volleyer.
mecir72 is offline  
post #10 of 17 (permalink) Old 01-16-2010, 07:47 AM
Registered User
 
Nidhogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,772
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

It would have been interesting to see a line drawn at maximum racquet headsize allowed at, say, 95''. Such a regulation should emphasize control, feel and attacking tennis rather than sheer power and gets in absurdum in the game.
Nidhogg is offline  
post #11 of 17 (permalink) Old 01-16-2010, 08:40 AM
Registered User
 
LleytonMonfils's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 3,888
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

So the game has evolved just like most sports have? WOW! Shocking BOMBSHELL Navratilova. The lady was good but someone really needs to put a muzzle on her. She is always making some kind of ridiculous statement or comment. Sorry Martina the spotlight is off of you now. Move on.
LleytonMonfils is offline  
post #12 of 17 (permalink) Old 01-16-2010, 08:47 AM
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 53,509
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nidhogg View Post
It would have been interesting to see a line drawn at maximum racquet headsize allowed at, say, 95''. Such a regulation should emphasize control, feel and attacking tennis rather than sheer power and gets in absurdum in the game.
What I do think is that the game's authorities have been lax over equipment regulation and basically ceded control of this area over to the manufacturers, allowing them to build whatever they want and call it a tennis racquet as long as it's within certain guidelines, which are probably too loosely drawn.

That genie was let out of the bottle decades ago and there's no sign of it slowing down - the style of the game has changed even in the last ten years, spin rules now.

The manufacturers keep going and who knows what developments they will come up with next and what the game will look like ten years from now. It's something I hope the tennis authorities have belatedly become awake to and are keeping a close eye on the situation, though I suspect not.
scoobs is offline  
post #13 of 17 (permalink) Old 01-16-2010, 08:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Age: 25
Posts: 1,104
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

we are tired of her ugly old ass
the graduate is offline  
post #14 of 17 (permalink) Old 01-16-2010, 08:50 AM
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 53,509
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

Well in fairness to Martina, this is a 3 year old thread that was bumped.

These are not brand new observations from her tired cracked ass.
scoobs is offline  
post #15 of 17 (permalink) Old 01-16-2010, 08:56 AM
Registered User
 
sammy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Derby
Posts: 8,327
                     
Re: Navratilova Comments about Federer/Racquets Wrong Headed

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoobs View Post
What I do think is that the game's authorities have been lax over equipment regulation and basically ceded control of this area over to the manufacturers, allowing them to build whatever they want and call it a tennis racquet as long as it's within certain guidelines, which are probably too loosely drawn.

That genie was let out of the bottle decades ago and there's no sign of it slowing down - the style of the game has changed even in the last ten years, spin rules now.

The manufacturers keep going and who knows what developments they will come up with next and what the game will look like ten years from now. It's something I hope the tennis authorities have belatedly become awake to and are keeping a close eye on the situation, though I suspect not.
i agree with what you wrote. im worried tennis will go to far but i guess that remains to be seen.

as for nav, shes old school, you gotta respect that she played with a lump of wood probably heavier than she when a junior.

Tori Amos

Quote:
You don't show much these days, I get so fucking cold. He moves like the sunset, god who painted that
Follow me on twitter I talk loads of shit about tennis - https://twitter.com/#!/Sammyb01
sammy01 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome