Becker questions current ATP schedule - MensTennisForums.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 08-09-2002, 01:41 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
KaseyL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: in a Lounge at times ;)
Posts: 4,539
                     
Becker questions current ATP schedule

Don't think it has been posted:

Becker Says Streamlined Schedule Would Promote Player Rivalries

By Richard Pagliaro, 08/08/2002

While some longtime tennis fans long for the days where riveting rivalries between Bjorn Borg, Jimmy Connors and John McEnroe were consistent championship climaxes before giving way to serve-and-volley showdowns between Boris Becker and Stefan Edberg, others celebrate the depth on today's ATP Tour that produced eight different champions in the eight Grand Slams prior to Lleyton Hewitt's Wimbledon win.

Asked to assess the current state of the ATP Tour, Becker believes that time — time for young players to develop and a schedule that permits players to take time off from the tour — is the most crucial element necessary in developing player personalities and more men's rivalries.

"The schedule right now is so full that these young players don't really have a time to breathe, they don't have an offseason, and they're really in this system where they have to play constantly every week," Becker said. "Therefore, it's very hard to let their heart and soul out on the court every single time they go out."

The three-time Wimbledon winner said a streamlined schedule that permitted the top players to play fewer tournaments would allow players to enter events playing at their physical peak and promote the type or rivalries that women's tennis has produced in the past.

"This (player schedules) is one of the reasons you have very clear rivalries (in women's tennis)," Becker said. "The Williams sisters, you have Capriati, Davenport, hopefully Kournikova one day. On the other hand, they play 14 tournaments a year, 14 or 15. They gear for the Slams, maybe another handful where they really want to win. On the men's side, top guys play 20, 25 events. It's impossible to play that many tournaments in your top form."

For Becker, the solution is simple: reducing the quantity of tournaments on the ATP scheduled would increase the quality of tennis.

"We talked about the issue for years and years," Becker said. "Obviously, there needs to be a change of schedule. There needs to be less tournaments. You see top guys playing more each other, and that's the way you start with the rivalries in competition."

Evil Queen of Suspense
aka wise Yoda (the New and Improved read Better Looking and Vain Version )


"Follow your bliss and don't be afraid, and doors will open where you didn't know they were going to be."
Joseph Campbell
KaseyL is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 08-09-2002, 01:57 PM
Registered User
 
Nimi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under your bed!
Age: 27
Posts: 2,206
                     
All true.

Tennis, Ergo Sum.
Nimi is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 08-09-2002, 02:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 398
                     
I wonder why Becker didn't mention Dokic

Anyway, the players can still organize their own schedule. If they are playing more than in the past, it means they want to.

"Yes, let me tell you once again
I am the captain of my pain"
Nick Cave and the bad seeds - Brother, my cup is empty
The Crow is offline  
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 08-09-2002, 02:43 PM
Registered User
 
TheBoiledEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: in Woop Woop Land
Posts: 17,684
                     
i wanna see more meets between

Marat and the Potato
Tommy Haas and Marat
Tommy and the Potato

Guga vs Marat
Moya vs the Potato

and alot more
TheBoiledEgg is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 08-09-2002, 03:47 PM
Jem
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 38
                     
Yes, there needs to be more rivalries, but I don't think the schedule is the cause of that. It's the parity. A shortened season would not prevent upsets. In fact, shorten the schedule and you might have even fewer matchups between the big guys. And besides, shorten the season, and I guarantee you that the big guns will be flying here, there and everywhere on a lucrative exhibition circuit. I'd rather see tournaments that count than exhibitions. Besides, the ATP is making strides in lowering the number of tournaments -- it was 80-plus a few years back and it's now below 65. While I like the current set-up -- mandatory masters and grand slams in the rankings -- they might consider knocking out a few Master's events (maybe 7 vs. 9) and lower the minimum number of tournaments to 16 or 17.
Jem is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 08-09-2002, 04:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 22
 
We hear this argument often to shorten the schedules. I think the quality will increase with fewer tournaments.

Parity will decrease when the players can stay healthy and focused during the shorter season.

That's my hypothesis.
eshell is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 08-09-2002, 04:51 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
KaseyL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: in a Lounge at times ;)
Posts: 4,539
                     
I think that quality will increase too. Less injury risk, less risk that some players might seek refuge in dope,...

I see only benefits.

However I am not so sure that it will lead to more rivalry. It takes more for that than reducing a schedule.

Evil Queen of Suspense
aka wise Yoda (the New and Improved read Better Looking and Vain Version )


"Follow your bliss and don't be afraid, and doors will open where you didn't know they were going to be."
Joseph Campbell
KaseyL is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 08-10-2002, 06:57 PM
dbc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 187
                     
Don't know about a shorter schedule, but certainly reducing the number of t'ments where their points count would help.
If it was the Slams, Masters and 4 others instead of 6, many of the top players would play less t'ments.
However those lower ranked would still try & play more t'ments to try & get better results in those 4, besides those who just play as many tourneys as possible just for the money - & that just won't change.
dbc is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome