Nadal/Federer assessment - MensTennisForums.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 01:59 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
marifline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,185
                     
Nadal/Federer assessment

Federer lost four times to Nadal this year, and only against him : Nadal won
Dubai ( hard) 2-6 6-4 6-4
AMS Monte-Carlo (clay): 6-2 6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(5)
AMS Rome (clay) : 6-7 7-6(5) 6-4 2-6 7-6(5)
Roland Garros ( clay) : 1-6 6-1 6-4 7-6(4)

So Federer lost every single time he played Nadal this year, and of course it was only finals. More important he lost on hard court against Nadal for the first time.

As afr as Nadal is concerned, he has lost four times as well - but he began his season in Marseille on February where he lost his first match- He lost to :
Arnaud Clément in Marseille SF ( hard) : 6-2 3-6 5-7
James Blake in AMS Indian Wells SF ( hard) : 5-7 3-6
Carlos Moya in AMS Miami 2nd round ( hard) : 5-7 3-6
Lleyton Hewitt in Queen's QF : 3-6 6-3 ret.

So obvisouly he won every match on clay, first defeat when he was just recovering from his foot injurie, last having a shoulder injury.

Now, I find it very scaring...Nadal is a real beast and who can guess what would happen in a Nadal/Federer final in next USO or AO ? I seems obvious that Fed has now a Nadal complex and that Nadal has nope...
Grass appeared as the last Nadal-threat free kingdom of the tour but... this shoulder injury didn't let us see what could happen in Queen's so...Another thing..Wimbledon could be the only tournament where Nadal and Federer xould meet before the final..interesting... a shame he got that shoulder injuryLet's just see what happen next and hope Nadal will play Wimbledon so we can make a statement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremda01 View Post
hear we go again 2 bps, only one is needed.
Because sometimes, you just need the obvious to be stated.
marifline is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 02:02 PM
Registered User
 
Billabong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 30
Posts: 18,737
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

OMG as if we didn't have enough Nadal/Federer threads I think I'm going to implode now

Guga Kuerten

Roger Federer & Novak Djokovic
Billabong is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 02:04 PM
Registered User
 
TennisGrandSlam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong SAR, China
Age: 36
Posts: 1,662
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by marifline
Federer lost four times to Nadal this year, and only against him : Nadal won
Dubai ( hard) 2-6 6-4 6-4
AMS Monte-Carlo (clay): 6-2 6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(5)
AMS Rome (clay) : 6-7 7-6(5) 6-4 2-6 7-6(5)
Roland Garros ( clay) : 1-6 6-1 6-4 7-6(4)

So Federer lost every single time he played Nadal this year, and of course it was only finals. More important he lost on hard court against Nadal for the first time.

As afr as Nadal is concerned, he has lost four times as well - but he began his season in Marseille on February where he lost his first match- He lost to :
Arnaud Clément in Marseille SF ( hard) : 6-2 3-6 5-7
James Blake in AMS Indian Wells SF ( hard) : 5-7 3-6
Carlos Moya in AMS Miami 2nd round ( hard) : 5-7 3-6
Lleyton Hewitt in Queen's QF : 3-6 6-3 ret.

So obvisouly he won every match on clay, first defeat when he was just recovering from his foot injurie, last having a shoulder injury.

Now, I find it very scaring...Nadal is a real beast and who can guess what would happen in a Nadal/Federer final in next USO or AO ? I seems obvious that Fed has now a Nadal complex and that Nadal has nope...
Grass appeared as the last Nadal-threat free kingdom of the tour but... this shoulder injury didn't let us see what could happen in Queen's so...Another thing..Wimbledon could be the only tournament where Nadal and Federer xould meet before the final..interesting... a shame he got that shoulder injuryLet's just see what happen next and hope Nadal will play Wimbledon so we can make a statement.

Not 1st time, don't forget Miami AMS 2004
TennisGrandSlam is offline  
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 03:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 755
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

The same thing was said last year and Federer still was clearly number 1. Federer is just too good for Nadal.
jacobhiggins is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 03:15 PM
Registered User
 
eddie_hyden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 39
Posts: 220
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

should i pour oil to the fire? ...ermm.. maybe not this time.
eddie_hyden is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 03:39 PM
Registered User
 
Scotso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 33
Posts: 70,027
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacobhiggins
The same thing was said last year and Federer still was clearly number 1. Federer is just too good for Nadal.
uh... 1-6?


Le Poussin! Faithfully ignoring the haters since 1995.

Le Poulailler de Poussin! (Simontarded.)

Ron Paul for President 2012!
Scotso is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 03:56 PM
Registered User
 
stebs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 43
Posts: 11,530
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

Well yes of course Nadal is great but if you look at it is this way.

Nadal is still behind Roger in the race as Roger has won a slam, two AMS events, an optional, and been runner up in an optional and two AMS events.

Nadal has won pretty much the same but with an added optional and without the runner up positions in the AMS's off clay.

Roger has had a better year than Rafa so far and we have had the slower half of the year. The next half of the year is grass and the faster hard courts, I don't think Roger has too much to worry about. If he stays fit he should be fine.

Champions deserve whatever they win playing within the laws of the game
stebs is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 06:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 755
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by MatejBockoFan
uh... 1-6?

There head to head record is lopsided but Federer is the better and more complete player. Hence all the titles on the different surfaces. Nadal is not good enough of a player to win on other surfaces like Federer is and last year and the rankings prove that!
jacobhiggins is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 06:59 PM
Registered User
 
jenanun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,573
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacobhiggins
There head to head record is lopsided but Federer is the better and more complete player. Hence all the titles on the different surfaces. Nadal is not good enough of a player to win on other surfaces like Federer is and last year and the rankings prove that!
yes federer is a more complete than nadal now...

but god knows how nadal will be like in 5 years time?

i mean, federer was not even half as good as nadal when he was 20....

but whether nadal will be another hewitt as many people has suggested, still remained to be seen
jenanun is offline  
post #10 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 07:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 755
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

Well even at 20 Federer had a more complete game and more shots then Nadal does. That's the big difference between the two. Federer ALWAYS had a complete all court all surface game, it was only his consistency that was suspect when he was younger!

That's why the whole age debate doesn't make any sense to me. Federer was very unsual and got good late unlike Nadal who got good very early in his career. That doesn't mean Nadal will improve like Federer did though. He never had the game Federer did or does.

Last edited by jacobhiggins; 06-17-2006 at 07:07 PM.
jacobhiggins is offline  
post #11 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-17-2006, 07:41 PM
Registered User
 
jenanun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,573
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacobhiggins
Well even at 20 Federer had a more complete game and more shots then Nadal does. That's the big difference between the two. Federer ALWAYS had a complete all court all surface game, it was only his consistency that was suspect when he was younger!

That's why the whole age debate doesn't make any sense to me. Federer was very unsual and got good late unlike Nadal who got good very early in his career. That doesn't mean Nadal will improve like Federer did though. He never had the game Federer did or does.
i didnt say federer had a less complete game than nadal when he was 20

but base on all the results, he really wasnt as good as nadal....

nevermind, my comparison is not appropraite... we cannot compare a 20 years old nadal and a 20 years old federer, maybe a 20 years old federer can beat nadal but not a 25 years old federer, who knows?
(and I am not being sarcastic..... )
jenanun is offline  
post #12 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-18-2006, 01:54 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 702
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by TennisGrandSlam
Not 1st time, don't forget Miami AMS 2004
actually nadal beat federer first at AMS 2003 Miami

Rafael Nadal
David Nalbandian



Mikael Youzhny | Nikolay Davydenko | Evgeny Korolev
Marat Safin | Richard Gasquet | Kristof Vliegen
Igor Andreev | Dimitry Tursonov | Juan Carlos Ferrero
azmad_88 is offline  
post #13 of 13 (permalink) Old 06-18-2006, 05:34 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 755
                     
Re: Nadal/Federer assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by jenanun
i didnt say federer had a less complete game than nadal when he was 20

but base on all the results, he really wasnt as good as nadal....

nevermind, my comparison is not appropraite... we cannot compare a 20 years old nadal and a 20 years old federer, maybe a 20 years old federer can beat nadal but not a 25 years old federer, who knows?
(and I am not being sarcastic..... )
He wasn't as good as Nadal based on results but he was not a one trick pony like Nadal has been. Federer was good on hardcourts, grass, and clay, he just was not mentally there yet. There is a big difference between the young Federer and the young Nadal!
jacobhiggins is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome