The question is simple. I think Rafa deserves this and should be #2 seed. There is so much gap between Rafa and Roddick (2165 points). I think this time that stupid formula won't help Roddick to be #2 seed. Even if it helped, Roddick shouldn't be #2 seed because he doesn't deserve that place. I didn't mention other players to be #2 seed because according to the stupid formula they won't get too much points. Only exception is at Roddick's side. What are your opinions?
He almost certainly will be, so long as Wimbledon is using a formula for seedings. It's simply too absurd to find a formula that will make up for the 2165 point gap between he and Roddick Roddick's Wimbledon final only chops than down to 1465.
The ONLY way they could do it would be to go with subjective seedings and not use a formula... something they stopped doing a while a go
Whether or not he *should* be depends on whether or not you think that slams should seed by surface.
. Take INDESIT ATP Entry Ranking points at Monday, June 13, 2005
· Add 100% of points earned for all grass court tournaments in the previous 12 months
· Add 75% of points earned at a player’s best grass court event in the 12 months before that.