Why did roger change tactic from Rome? - MensTennisForums.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 04:16 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 276
                     
Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

No attacking play today? Not many slices? Why?
mecir72 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 04:20 PM
Registered User
 
FedFanUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 52
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

BRAIN FART
FedFanUS is offline  
post #3 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 04:21 PM
Ace Loveforty
 
scarecrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tirana, ALBANIA
Posts: 81,601
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

coz he's an idiot

http://www.menstennisforums.com/show...&postcount=378

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormerRafaFan View Post
That will be the last victory of Rafa for quite some time.. With his joke mentality and pathetic game, I hope the disgusting player loses every single match next season. He's disgraceful. He should just retire. He's a joke.
Quote:
Originally Posted by l_mac View Post
(10) Corey Feldman vs. (12) scarecrows
scarecrows is offline  
post #4 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 04:23 PM
Registered User
 
FedFanUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 52
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Think the "bigness" of the moment got to Roger. Strategy,body language, unforced errors were brutal today.
FedFanUS is offline  
post #5 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 04:42 PM
Registered User
 
Ruski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 628
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Roger didn't seem to employ any tactics during the match at all!!!
He simply looked dejected throughout the match after winning the 1st set!!!
Where was his aggressive game? variety of shots?
Wasn't he mention last year that his goal was going to win French Open? Well, I couldn't see his determination to win it at all!!!
A match that Roger should forget!!

Yevgeny Kafelnikov
French Open Champion 1996
Australian Open Champion 1999
Olympics Gold Medalist at Sydney 2000
Singles Career Titles: 26 Doubles Career Titles: 27


Davai! Dmitry Tursunov!
Ruski is offline  
post #6 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 04:46 PM
Registered User
 
WF4EVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,159
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Hey, Iím a huge fan of Roger Federer but after watching him gift another match to Nadal with his countless unnecessary errors and free shank points, Iím convinced heís an idiot.

Donít tell me after playing someone 3 times in a row this year, and after coming so close in Rome that youíre gonna come into another final making the same shitty mistakes. Frankly, Nadal did nothing to win this match except return the ball the same way he usually does and wait for Federer to make another error. Those backhand errors you expect most of the time (even tho you expect at some point heíd have learnt better) but those easy forehands that he missed into the net to give Nadal that 3rd set break and those loose forehands in the latter stages of the match and tie-break were just ridiculous.

What annoys me the most about Federer is that he continues to take umbrage with the flack he gets about not being able to beat Nadal but when he gets the chance he plays like a pussy. Well, heís going to have a whole lot more flack to deal with after this one because he did nothing to put himself into a winning position.

Iím really pissed off at Federer, Iím not even sad that he lost, he deserved to lose, because he has yet again demonstrated that he doesnít know what the hell heís doing when it comes to beating Nadal, or if he does know he lacks the balls to do it!

. He failed to play an aggressive game after winning that first set as he has always done against Nadal. Instead of keeping the pressure on and forcing the issue he was content to stand behind the baseline and make error after error. What an idiot performance today. No way he deserved that match. The player who stood his ground won albeit with the same game he always played and Federer apparently having not learned his lesson yet played the same losing game for the portion of the match that counted post.

I hope this stings him for a very long time because he has nothing to show in this match that he can beat Nadal. After Rome I expected a whole lot better performance. He didnít even go down fighting in this match; he just went down.

Obviously he hasnít watched other players play Nadal. Obviously he hasnít yet realized that all that fucking topspin on his returns are fodder for Nadal. Geez, Roger. Could you have brainfarted any worse today?

Mirka has her work cut out for her trying to get you through this one.

How the fuck do you say Nadalís Bitch in Swiss-German.
WF4EVER is offline  
post #7 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 04:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,796
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WF4EVER
Hey, Iím a huge fan of Roger Federer but after watching him gift another match to Nadal with his countless unnecessary errors and free shank points, Iím convinced heís an idiot.

Donít tell me after playing someone 3 times in a row this year, and after coming so close in Rome that youíre gonna come into another final making the same shitty mistakes. Frankly, Nadal did nothing to win this match except return the ball the same way he usually does and wait for Federer to make another error. Those backhand errors you expect most of the time (even tho you expect at some point heíd have learnt better) but those easy forehands that he missed into the net to give Nadal that 3rd set break and those loose forehands in the latter stages of the match and tie-break were just ridiculous.

What annoys me the most about Federer is that he continues to take umbrage with the flack he gets about not being able to beat Nadal but when he gets the chance he plays like a pussy. Well, heís going to have a whole lot more flack to deal with after this one because he did nothing to put himself into a winning position.

Iím really pissed off at Federer, Iím not even sad that he lost, he deserved to lose, because he has yet again demonstrated that he doesnít know what the hell heís doing when it comes to beating Nadal, or if he does know he lacks the balls to do it!

. He failed to play an aggressive game after winning that first set as he has always done against Nadal. Instead of keeping the pressure on and forcing the issue he was content to stand behind the baseline and make error after error. What an idiot performance today. No way he deserved that match. The player who stood his ground won albeit with the same game he always played and Federer apparently having not learned his lesson yet played the same losing game for the portion of the match that counted post.

I hope this stings him for a very long time because he has nothing to show in this match that he can beat Nadal. After Rome I expected a whole lot better performance. He didnít even go down fighting in this match; he just went down.

Obviously he hasnít watched other players play Nadal. Obviously he hasnít yet realized that all that fucking topspin on his returns are fodder for Nadal. Geez, Roger. Could you have brainfarted any worse today?

Mirka has her work cut out for her trying to get you through this one.

How the fuck do you say Nadalís Bitch in Swiss-German.
A bit on the angry side, but I agree. Very disappointing effort by Roger, especially after cruising through the first set. After that, he just looked dejected the rest of the match and his backhand was amateur status, it was that bad.
Freeze17171 is offline  
post #8 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 04:54 PM
Registered User
 
FedFanUS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 52
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Very Blunt, but the sad reality is that is true.

Unfortunately, I don't think Roger looks at it as a bad loss. I don't think he will get it into his head about Nadal till Rafael beats Roger in a major on a surface other than clay.

Which don't be surprised if Nadal beats Roger at the U.S. Open.
FedFanUS is offline  
post #9 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 05:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 27
Posts: 420
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

lol We shall see, honestly.

Anser Quraishi
Website: http://www.anserq.com
Fav player: Roger Federer
Racquet: Prince Diablo XP
anserq is offline  
post #10 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 05:08 PM
Registered User
 
WF4EVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,159
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Yes, I was angry when I wrote the above but I'm not hurt at all that he loss. I'm over it already and looking to get something to eat, lol. I'm just astounded by Roger's performance (or lack thereof) today.

And hey, if you can't bring it mentally in a Slam Final, your eighth! when will you bring it. Get where I'm coming from. A big moment indeed but Roger has been in big moments before (including 7 Slam finals) so he had no excuse for not playing his best. If he had played his best and lost at least you could still say he tried and was outdone. Today he was just outdone.

I still love you, Roger. Your game is amazing but the Rafa side of your brain needs to be examined, lol.
WF4EVER is offline  
post #11 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 05:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,037
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mecir72
No attacking play today? Not many slices? Why?
RG is slower than Rome by far. And if Federer was making this many errors not playing aggresively who knows how many he would have made otherwise. Nadal is so quick that he is able to get under slices and they wouldn't have affected him like they did with Nalbandian.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCtennisfan
You cannot be great without having haters. It's a fact of life.

I guess Roddick must be the greatest player to ever play the game.
nkhera1 is offline  
post #12 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 05:20 PM
Registered User
 
nsidhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Milwaukee
Age: 37
Posts: 853
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WF4EVER
Hey, Iím a huge fan of Roger Federer but after watching him gift another match to Nadal with his countless unnecessary errors and free shank points, Iím convinced heís an idiot.

Donít tell me after playing someone 3 times in a row this year, and after coming so close in Rome that youíre gonna come into another final making the same shitty mistakes. Frankly, Nadal did nothing to win this match except return the ball the same way he usually does and wait for Federer to make another error. Those backhand errors you expect most of the time (even tho you expect at some point heíd have learnt better) but those easy forehands that he missed into the net to give Nadal that 3rd set break and those loose forehands in the latter stages of the match and tie-break were just ridiculous.

What annoys me the most about Federer is that he continues to take umbrage with the flack he gets about not being able to beat Nadal but when he gets the chance he plays like a pussy. Well, heís going to have a whole lot more flack to deal with after this one because he did nothing to put himself into a winning position.

Iím really pissed off at Federer, Iím not even sad that he lost, he deserved to lose, because he has yet again demonstrated that he doesnít know what the hell heís doing when it comes to beating Nadal, or if he does know he lacks the balls to do it!

. He failed to play an aggressive game after winning that first set as he has always done against Nadal. Instead of keeping the pressure on and forcing the issue he was content to stand behind the baseline and make error after error. What an idiot performance today. No way he deserved that match. The player who stood his ground won albeit with the same game he always played and Federer apparently having not learned his lesson yet played the same losing game for the portion of the match that counted post.

I hope this stings him for a very long time because he has nothing to show in this match that he can beat Nadal. After Rome I expected a whole lot better performance. He didnít even go down fighting in this match; he just went down.

Obviously he hasnít watched other players play Nadal. Obviously he hasnít yet realized that all that fucking topspin on his returns are fodder for Nadal. Geez, Roger. Could you have brainfarted any worse today?

Mirka has her work cut out for her trying to get you through this one.

How the fuck do you say Nadalís Bitch in Swiss-German.

I AGREE 100%
nsidhan is offline  
post #13 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 05:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 27
Posts: 41
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WF4EVER
Hey, Iím a huge fan of Roger Federer but after watching him gift another match to Nadal with his countless unnecessary errors and free shank points, Iím convinced heís an idiot.

Donít tell me after playing someone 3 times in a row this year, and after coming so close in Rome that youíre gonna come into another final making the same shitty mistakes. Frankly, Nadal did nothing to win this match except return the ball the same way he usually does and wait for Federer to make another error. Those backhand errors you expect most of the time (even tho you expect at some point heíd have learnt better) but those easy forehands that he missed into the net to give Nadal that 3rd set break and those loose forehands in the latter stages of the match and tie-break were just ridiculous.

What annoys me the most about Federer is that he continues to take umbrage with the flack he gets about not being able to beat Nadal but when he gets the chance he plays like a pussy. Well, heís going to have a whole lot more flack to deal with after this one because he did nothing to put himself into a winning position.

Iím really pissed off at Federer, Iím not even sad that he lost, he deserved to lose, because he has yet again demonstrated that he doesnít know what the hell heís doing when it comes to beating Nadal, or if he does know he lacks the balls to do it!

. He failed to play an aggressive game after winning that first set as he has always done against Nadal. Instead of keeping the pressure on and forcing the issue he was content to stand behind the baseline and make error after error. What an idiot performance today. No way he deserved that match. The player who stood his ground won albeit with the same game he always played and Federer apparently having not learned his lesson yet played the same losing game for the portion of the match that counted post.

I hope this stings him for a very long time because he has nothing to show in this match that he can beat Nadal. After Rome I expected a whole lot better performance. He didnít even go down fighting in this match; he just went down.

Obviously he hasnít watched other players play Nadal. Obviously he hasnít yet realized that all that fucking topspin on his returns are fodder for Nadal. Geez, Roger. Could you have brainfarted any worse today?

Mirka has her work cut out for her trying to get you through this one.

How the fuck do you say Nadalís Bitch in Swiss-German.
TOTALLY! My depression is turning into anger and frustration!! He deserved this! Why dint he just GO FO IT?!~!!!!????
fooclate is offline  
post #14 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 05:56 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 276
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nkhera1
RG is slower than Rome by far. And if Federer was making this many errors not playing aggresively who knows how many he would have made otherwise. Nadal is so quick that he is able to get under slices and they wouldn't have affected him like they did with Nalbandian.
Dont know about that, the weather today should make that sort of play very possible. I just think he mentally collapsed after mishitting so many shots on the highbouncing nadal top spins.I dont think Nadal is ready to beat Roger at the US Open yet but certainly at the AUS Open.
mecir72 is offline  
post #15 of 17 (permalink) Old 06-11-2006, 06:00 PM
Registered User
 
BlueSwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 41
Posts: 2,243
                     
Re: Why did roger change tactic from Rome?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WF4EVER
Hey, Iím a huge fan of Roger Federer but after watching him gift another match to Nadal with his countless unnecessary errors and free shank points, Iím convinced heís an idiot.

Donít tell me after playing someone 3 times in a row this year, and after coming so close in Rome that youíre gonna come into another final making the same shitty mistakes. Frankly, Nadal did nothing to win this match except return the ball the same way he usually does and wait for Federer to make another error. Those backhand errors you expect most of the time (even tho you expect at some point heíd have learnt better) but those easy forehands that he missed into the net to give Nadal that 3rd set break and those loose forehands in the latter stages of the match and tie-break were just ridiculous.

What annoys me the most about Federer is that he continues to take umbrage with the flack he gets about not being able to beat Nadal but when he gets the chance he plays like a pussy. Well, heís going to have a whole lot more flack to deal with after this one because he did nothing to put himself into a winning position.

Iím really pissed off at Federer, Iím not even sad that he lost, he deserved to lose, because he has yet again demonstrated that he doesnít know what the hell heís doing when it comes to beating Nadal, or if he does know he lacks the balls to do it!

. He failed to play an aggressive game after winning that first set as he has always done against Nadal. Instead of keeping the pressure on and forcing the issue he was content to stand behind the baseline and make error after error. What an idiot performance today. No way he deserved that match. The player who stood his ground won albeit with the same game he always played and Federer apparently having not learned his lesson yet played the same losing game for the portion of the match that counted post.

I hope this stings him for a very long time because he has nothing to show in this match that he can beat Nadal. After Rome I expected a whole lot better performance. He didnít even go down fighting in this match; he just went down.

Obviously he hasnít watched other players play Nadal. Obviously he hasnít yet realized that all that fucking topspin on his returns are fodder for Nadal. Geez, Roger. Could you have brainfarted any worse today?

Mirka has her work cut out for her trying to get you through this one.

How the fuck do you say Nadalís Bitch in Swiss-German.
Yeah, that's the sad truth.

I hope Roger will regain his focus for Wimbledon. Constantly losing to Nadal has got to hurt his confidence at some point, even if he's still beating anyone else.
BlueSwan is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MensTennisForums.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome